Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CAL Ownership Structure - A Cause Of Accidents?  
User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12593 posts, RR: 34
Posted (11 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1601 times:

Just having a quick breeze through the Yahoo aviation news (always worth a look) and came across this:

Analysts have said the awkward shareholding structure of China Airlines - which says it is a private company, though it remains under government influence - is the key reason for the company's safety record, one of the worst in Asia. Last May's accident was the 10th fatal crash since 1970.

Huh?

Surely it's more to do with cockpit discipline and a greater willingness to take chances and regard the contents of the ops manual as "suggestions" rather than mandatory? Can't see how the carrier's owner structure would impinge on safety so directly. After all, the crashes they've had have been due to pilot error or (in the case of the 742 a while back) structural failure.

There's analysts for you, though . . .

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAndreas From Germany, joined Oct 2001, 6104 posts, RR: 31
Reply 1, posted (11 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1588 times:

I'm afraid we need more info on that one. What is written in your post does fit many carriers, in Europe, in Asia...for example many European carriers with a brilliant safety record are private companies under heavy influence of their respective governments.




I know it's only VfB but I like it!
User currently offlineAlexchao From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 688 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 8 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 1527 times:

Even though China Airlines has a bad safety record, I don't think that means they don't have a regard for safety or the OPS manual.

I guess some people in Taiwan feel that China Airlines has been supported so much by the government in the past. Under those circumstances, the company developed a different type of culture. For example, CI originally used a large portion of air force pilots.

Just my two cents.

-alexchao


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Cause Of Atlantic Airways Crash. posted Tue Oct 17 2006 17:26:54 by CPHGuard
Cause Of Crash Determined - S7 778 posted Thu Aug 3 2006 11:09:51 by Tu204
Electrical Systems The Main Cause Of A380 Delay posted Mon Jun 19 2006 13:33:37 by EI321
AA1466 5/26 Cause Of Delay posted Fri May 26 2006 17:41:09 by TAN FLYR
1 Year Until We Find Cause Of SW Overrun? posted Sat Dec 10 2005 09:47:52 by Darrenthe747
Cause Of Air Sahara Overshooting The Runway posted Sun Oct 16 2005 23:32:55 by Aman777
Cause Of Crash Of CF-CUQ In 1965? posted Wed Sep 7 2005 07:34:46 by CFCUQ
"Culture" The Cause Of Recent Crashes? posted Tue Sep 6 2005 12:38:24 by BCAL
CO DC-10 Titanium Strip Cause Of Concord Crash posted Fri Jun 17 2005 02:20:04 by Squirrel83
KLM Changes To Bey Via Larnaca Cause Of Security posted Sun Apr 3 2005 17:32:01 by Soups