Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Jetblue A320.5: Why Not A320-300?  
User currently offlineAmerican 767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3728 posts, RR: 12
Posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2449 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Hy everyone,
I was reading the other day an article in Airways all about Jetblue. They are doing very well, they seem to be expanding network and fleet and as you know Jetblue's future fleet plan is exclusively the Airbus A320 aircraft, at least for the near future. But something in Jetblue's profile caught my attention: at the request of Jetblue, Airbus is going to make an A320.5 which will simply be an A320 with two extra rows in the main cabin, don't you think this variant should be named A320-300? I really think so. There was originally the A320-100 which wasn't produced in many units, then the A320-200 which is the current variant in production today, so logically the next variant should be the A320-300. Maybe they mean it will fill the gap between the A320 and the A321, but to me A320-300 seems to be a more logical move than A320.5.
In Jetblue's computer reservation system, if the aircraft is an A320-300, the abbreviation would be 323. If it's a regular A320 then the abbreviation is simply 320. The A323 doesn't exist so there will not be any confustion at all.

Ben Soriano
Brussels Belgium


Ben Soriano
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOD720 From Lebanon, joined Feb 2003, 1924 posts, RR: 33
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2410 times:

How about a 325 on the reservation system?

From what I know, it won't be a stretch, it will only be a change in the interior, right?


User currently offlineLarspl From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 473 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2406 times:

sounds like the same idea boeing technics have to put 220 pax in the 739,

just replace the bubbled pressure wall (whats the exact name of the thing in the aft of the a/c?) with a flat one.
boeing has to add a type 1 exit to the 739 but then it can suit 220 pax in Y.
lars



facebook.com/ddaclassicairlines
User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2341 times:

Airbus has already made it clear that they will not physically stretch the aircraft due to recertification costs. Interior mods only to accomodate the extra rows.

The extra two rows are the ones that are missing when they opted for the 320 instead of the 738 (the original business model used the add'l seating as marginal revenue....).

It really doesn't matter what they call it.

I imagine it will also be popular with IT Charter carriers as well....


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Anyone Know Why A JetBlue A320 Just Landed @ Ewr? posted Thu Feb 21 2002 15:42:33 by KEWR
JetBlue A320 And XM Radio posted Thu Oct 26 2006 00:24:18 by JetBlueAUS
JetBlue A320 @ PHL Now. posted Sat Oct 7 2006 22:45:22 by USAir330
JetBlue San-Iad, Why Not San-Bos? posted Wed Sep 27 2006 07:22:07 by Hockey55dude
BUR Density Altitude/ JetBlue A320 Problems posted Mon Jun 26 2006 19:13:32 by Highflier92660
JetBlue A320 Vs. Jetway @ MCO posted Wed Mar 29 2006 17:39:07 by SCXmechanic
Jetblue A320 Landed In OKC! posted Thu Feb 16 2006 03:30:47 by Jetmatt777
JetBlue A320 Configurations posted Sat Feb 4 2006 22:03:15 by UnitedFirst
Jetblue A320 In Emergeny LGB Pt. 2 posted Thu Sep 22 2005 03:16:03 by Crogalski
Jetblue A320 In Emergeny LGB posted Thu Sep 22 2005 01:19:14 by Deltaflyertoo