Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Delta Turns Predatory On ATL-LAX; Triple Miles  
User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3938 times:

DL has decided to give triple miles to flyers on ATL-LAX/ONT/SNA. In addition, they offer another 2500 miles to members who sign up and then fly ATL-LAX at least once. Coupled with the 5 new flights on ATL-LAX, adding more seats than FL or B6 did, COMBINED, DL is definitely acting predatory on this route. DOJ should be taking notice, and I wouldn't be surprised to see FL and/or B6 file a lawsuit.

38 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineCLEfan From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 299 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3921 times:

Is it predatory or just good business? DL is trying to keep their customers loyal to their product by offering incentives. I see nothing predatory in this. Now if they were offering the flight for $1, that might be another thing.

User currently offlineWilliam From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1285 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3885 times:

Thank you CLEfan.....hey kids its called a FREE MARKET! SWA would have done the same and does when a competitor comes into its backyard. Want to take SWA to court now?

User currently offlineContinentalFan From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 357 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3884 times:

It's not like FF miles are worth anything these days... But the five new flights... that may be a bit much. Funny how they don't seem to be slashing fares, though. Guess they can't afford to do that in this economic environment.

User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3870 times:

>>SWA would have done the same and does when a competitor comes into its backyard.<<

Care to give an example where WN not just matched fares, but added more capacity than the competitor did, AND offered triple RR credits on the route.


User currently offlineTravatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2173 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3867 times:

LOL - AirTran only has to worry about filling up 324 seats a day, which they'll do with connecting traffic alone.....I've seen the bookings already...they're strong.

Sure it's a free market - but Delta now has to come up with over a THOUSAND extra passengers a day in a market that they already served, and doing so by giving away the farm, and destroying their yields. Doesn't sound predatory at all to me....just sounds stupid.

Travis


User currently offlineSjc>sfo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3855 times:

It's pretty cutthroat - the problem I see with it is that the goal of it is to push Airtran out of the market. I agree with Travis though, it's just stupid on Delta's part.

User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 16
Reply 7, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3814 times:

Thank you CLEfan.....hey kids its called a FREE MARKET! SWA would have done the same and does when a competitor comes into its backyard. Want to take SWA to court now?

Any examples of anyone who "took on" Southwest in one of their markets? Vanguard started MCI-LAX service, and yes, SWA did offer some fare sales, but they didn't drop their fares and add flights only to reduce them later.

Offering triple miles isn't predatory...but adding all those flights - if Airtran or JetBlue wanted to put a hurtin' on Delta...pull their flights. If Delta suddenly drops those 5 extra flights, head on over to DOJ and file a suit, then restart the routes.


User currently offlineExusair From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 684 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3798 times:

Why is it stupid?

The miles cost DL nothing. You can get miles just by getting a mortgage through a certain company or through get the AMEX card. Pay all of your bills with the AMEX card then send them a check for everything at the end of the month. They are flexing their marketing muscle.

SNA is underserved from the east coast. The existing flights are popular, so they add a frequency. ONT is underserved as well. ATL-LAX used to fly from 830am from ATL until 1130pm. 2 all night flights from LAX-ATL arrived at 5am and 7am. They still are not back to their pre 9/11 schedule witht hese additions.

LAX one of the busiest freight airports. LAX-ATL flights come in freight heavy, why not soak up some more of the demand? What were the frequencies between EAL and DL ATL-LAX? Why not compete with AirTran? Why not compete with JetBlue? Are any of you privvy to DL's costs for the ATL-LAX sector? What are their b/e points and revenue mixes?


User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 16
Reply 9, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3783 times:

All good points exusair, but IMHO, the goal of this is to force two little airlines out of that market. IF they do, and those freight laden flights are suddenly cut back - forcing heavier freight loads on the remaining flights - it's predatory...and predatory is stupid.

User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13608 posts, RR: 61
Reply 10, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3763 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

All good points exusair, but IMHO, the goal of this is to force two little airlines out of that market.

Couldn't the goal also just as easily be to build their market share or just keep market share from eroding?

It's my experience that when a major carrier does this, the knee-jerk reaction is for fans of LCCs to immediately cry that it's predatory, but when LCCs enter a market with lots of capacity and low fares, these hypocrites say it's just "good business."  Nuts

Of course, we can't let little things like facts get in the way, now can we?  Big grin




"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineMD88Captain From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1330 posts, RR: 20
Reply 11, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3750 times:

Just cry me a river.

User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 16
Reply 12, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3715 times:

All good points exusair, but IMHO, the goal of this is to force two little airlines out of that market.

Couldn't the goal also just as easily be to build their market share or just keep market share from eroding?


It could - if there was ever a big airline that maintained that capacity after a LCC was forced from the market

It's my experience that when a major carrier does this, the knee-jerk reaction is for fans of LCCs to immediately cry that it's predatory, but when LCCs enter a market with lots of capacity and low fares, these hypocrites say it's just "good business."

As I mentioned in my SWA/Vanguard example. Southwest didn't suddenly drop their highest fare to dirt levels, nor did they add a single frequency. When Vanguard pulled the route, Southwest actually added some flights after the fact. I suppose that is because they saw that there was some missed demand. That's 180 degrees different from what the big boys do. Since I live in KC, AA pops into my head...Against Vanguard they dropped their fares, and increased the MCI-DFW frequency to something like 12 daily flights. When Vanguard pulled DFW the first time, AA suddenly pulled back all that extra capacity. Seems to me that if one airline folds, that should open up some more demand and shouldn't result in a reduction in flights. That's why I say that if JetBlue or Airtran pulled the ATL-LA flights, just how long would Delta be happy with leading in "Market share" before reducing the number of flights?

Of course, we can't let little things like facts get in the way, now can we?

Sure can't...that's why I try my best to supply them to you Big grin



User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13608 posts, RR: 61
Reply 13, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3678 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It could - if there was ever a big airline that maintained that capacity after a LCC was forced from the market

Sure can't...that's why I try my best to supply them to you

Your argument is flawed, since it's all based on what COULD happen with DL in the future, not what HAS happened. And since DL hasn't driven anyone from the market, the "facts" you supply don't exist in this case, only previous ones.

Believe it or not, "well, it's always happened before!" doesn't mean it will this time.

Nice try, though. Keep on spinnin'.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3672 times:

So Delta's supposed to roll over and just go out of business?

Of course they are going to compete where they need to and not compete where they don't have to do so.

That's called "running a business."

Steve


User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3657 times:

>>but when LCCs enter a market with lots of capacity and low fares, these hypocrites say it's just "good business."<<

1) It is definitely different when the LCC can actually make a PROFIT on the route.

2) Care to name me a real life example where the LCC added more capacity than the new airline on the route, offered triple miles, and dropped fares by more than 50% while having a -10% profit margin when a major or another LCC started flying the city pair?


User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13608 posts, RR: 61
Reply 16, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3640 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Care to name me a real life example where the LCC added more capacity than the new airline on the route, offered triple miles, and dropped fares by more than 50% while having a -10% profit margin when a major or another LCC started flying the city pair?

The LCC IS the new airline on the route.

Care to show me your sources that cite DL having offering a -10% profit margin on the route? I'm sure the DOJ would love to hear from you if you can prove it.

What's that? You say you can't? Figures.

As someone else pointed out, are the major carriers supposed to just roll over and play dead for the LCCs? They have the right to defend their market share, and leveraging their advantages such as larger aircraft and frequent flier programs is just good business, not predation.



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 16
Reply 17, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3637 times:

Your argument is flawed, since it's all based on what COULD happen with DL in the future, not what HAS happened. And since DL hasn't driven anyone from the market, the "facts" you supply don't exist in this case, only previous ones.

Actually, what I said was this - IF Delta wants market share, more power to them. Herb Kelleher once said that he'd cede market share just as long as he made a profit. Winning the market share battle does not necessarily win the war. IF (notice I am emphasising IF) Delta simply wants to keep market share, they need to be careful...since if one or two LCC competitors leave a market, DL now has won the market share war. Now, they might even find themselves with excess capacity something that eats into those important profits. But...since they would "own" the market share, they could "trim" some of that excess capacity, but then the DOJ frowns upon that. So I suppose all I am saying is "Welcome to the market, Delta. Hope you stick around for a long, long time". If not...watch your back.

Happily spinning here in "thunderstorm alley"...GB


User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3584 times:

>>Care to show me your sources that cite DL having offering a -10% profit margin on the route? I'm sure the DOJ would love to hear from you if you can prove it.

What's that? You say you can't? Figures<<

I'm saying a -10% profit margin in general. Now that I check the facts-1Q03 3.1B in rev, 426 million loss EXCLUDING one time items =-14% profit margin, 4 points higher than what I thought it was off the top of my head. Doesn't sound like an airline that should be cutting fares by 50% or more and adding almost 1,000 seats at these low fares.

>>Care to name me a real life example where the LCC added more capacity than the new airline on the route, offered triple miles, and dropped fares by more than 50% while having a -10% profit margin when a major or another LCC started flying the city pair?

The LCC IS the new airline on the route.<<

You don't get the point. A LCC will always operate at a low cost even on monopoly routes. When I switch the roles around, the LCC doesn't pull all of the predatory tricks that DL did on ATL-LAX. FL didn't add 3 more dailies when DL announced ATL-PHF or ATL-CAK, and offer triple A+ rewards on the route. They didn't even lower their fares.

>>As someone else pointed out, are the major carriers supposed to just roll over and play dead for the LCCs? They have the right to defend their market share, and leveraging their advantages such as larger aircraft and frequent flier programs is just good business, not predation.<<

Good(aka ruthless) business or not, it still violates laws in place to prevent an unfair playing field. A good fighter could beat the crap out of someone using their known techniques and muscles, but they will still get in trouble with the law for fighting.

Predatory practices wouldn't be a problem if Delta decided to offer triple miles on all routes, and didn't add tons of seats to ATL-LA within days of B6 and FL announcing service.


User currently offlineLV From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 2005 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3570 times:

Not to take sides here.....but anyone remember PNS?

How about DFW-ICT with AA and Vanguard


User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4506 posts, RR: 33
Reply 20, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3532 times:

Your argument is flawed, since it's all based on what COULD happen with DL in the future, not what HAS happened. And since DL hasn't driven anyone from the market, the "facts" you supply don't exist in this case, only previous ones.

Ah yes, the old "it hasn't happened yet in this instance" argument. Doesn't fly, EA. The pattern of Cartel carriers dumping capacity when a low-fare competitor who can make money on lower fares enters a route, then cutting capacity and hiking fares after driving the low-fare out, is well known. You're the one who's spinning, sir.  Smile

One of the Delta higher-ups told Aviation Week after FL and B6 announced service, that Delta is going to "flood the ATL-LA Basin market with capacity." That's pretty blatant.

One weakness in US antitrust law right now, is that FF miles aren't counted towards predatory pricing. The Sherman Antitrust Act needs to be stiffened with tougher, more specific guidelines including: 1) clear definition of capacity dumping, which the USA v. AMR judge noted was lacking; and 2) inclusion of FF miles in predatory pricing (and the definition of FF miles should include formulas to figure in number of destinations and fact of alliance destinations).

When Congress tried to stiffen the Sherman Act in 1999, the Cartel published outright lying newspaper ads about "reregulation" and bamboozled a lot of Congresspeople and local communities. Such guidelines are still needed. Maybe now with business in revolt against the Cartel's pricing practices and yields through the floor, Congress could try again.

Making money by having a low CASM is not predatory, it's good business. Making money by temporarily charging below cost to drive out a lower-CASM competitor is predatory.

Jim






Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6204 posts, RR: 12
Reply 21, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3489 times:

There is nothing predatory about what DL did.


Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 84
Reply 22, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3467 times:

Actually, what DL is doing is the very definition of predatory.

The question is if its illegal or not.

They have to be operating the route at a loss for it to even be considered possibly shady, much less illegal.

N


User currently offlineBonanzaAir From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 80 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3436 times:

Does it really matter any more what Delta does, the airline has begun the slow spin of water rushing down the drain just as the others (UAL, U, and soon AMR ) have before it. As Joe Leonard said "the recover is here, the days of $1000 business class tickets are gone"

Does it really matter any more what Delta does - JetBlue and Airtran are going to make money.

Bonanza


User currently offlineDelta737 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 516 posts, RR: 10
Reply 24, posted (11 years 5 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3409 times:

Good!

Competition is good, right? Everyone preaches the competition mantra when the underdog goes against the behemoth. But when the behemoth defends itself via matching fares or offering a good deal, people scream bloody murder.

Delta matching fares and offering a good deal is as predatory as Jet Blue servicing LGB to ATL at a competitive fare.... It's not.

Doug Taylor
jetcareers.com


25 Trvlr : If what Delta is doing is "predatory", then what jetBlue is doing is awfully similar, except just called by a different name. Delta is only "predatory
26 Lowfareair : >>Competition is good, right? Everyone preaches the competition mantra when the underdog goes against the behemoth. But when the behemoth defends itse
27 Goingboeing : Competition is good, right? Everyone preaches the competition mantra when the underdog goes against the behemoth. But when the behemoth defends itself
28 Rumorboy : In the end Delta will lose a lot of money on this route. Someone stated here before all Airtran and Jetblue have to do his fill 300 or so seats a day.
29 DCA-ROCguy : I really hope you're right, Travis and Rumorboy...it'd be great to see Delta's attempt at predation just turn into lots of money down the drain. Then
30 ONT 737 : The success of the one daily LGB-SLC flight is evidence that LGB-ATL will be alright for B6. From SLC DL flies 8 daily to LAX, 5 five daily to SNA, an
31 UN_B732 : Delta wants to kill competition. ATL-LAX on Delta, Song. Mullin is bloodthirsty, did I say blood, I meant to say A-1. -UN_B732
32 UN_B732 : and Last-Minute fc is $359 one-way. Last-Minute Coach is also discounted
33 Rumorboy : last minute walk up FC is 359.00 one way. wow that gotta be hurting Delta!!
34 Airzim : Would you call Ryanair's tactic of selling fares from DUB to EDI for 1 pound predatory? I would. It happens both ways. In fact one could argue that Ry
35 BeltwayBandit : Delta's behavior is a classic example of a major using its balance sheet (or what's left of it) to pound a LCC into submission. They flood the city pa
36 Greg : But by legal definition it can be argued that the action is not predatory in either spirit or intent. Both sides can make a case...but Delta would ver
37 DCA-ROCguy : Free market types say that this is fine. Customers yield the benefit for a while, and the incumbent is free to make economic choices as it sees fit. I
38 Delta-flyer : Does anyone know the legal meaning of "predatory" -- in laymaen's terms? BTW... thanks for letting us know about the triple miles...I usually go to SN
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DL Pulling 763 With BizE Seats On ATL - LAX Route? posted Wed Oct 6 2004 04:55:10 by Pmanchuk
Delta Adding 777 To ATL-LAX posted Tue Oct 14 2003 00:44:15 by Ord
Upcoming Flight On Delta ATL-LAX posted Mon Apr 24 2006 00:52:54 by Ajiggity3
Delta Using 767-200s On ATL-SVO Route? posted Wed Jun 7 2006 09:01:51 by Aeroflot777
Delta Flight ATL-LAX Full posted Tue Apr 25 2006 19:40:15 by ATLAaron
Delta No Longer Using 764 On ATL-HNL posted Thu Oct 9 2003 21:53:34 by US A333 PIT
Delta ATL-LAX With The 777? posted Fri Mar 14 2003 02:35:34 by Soku39
Delta Adds Service ATL-LAX? posted Thu Mar 6 2003 20:31:54 by Atcboy73
Type Of L1011s Delta Used On ATL-HNL Nonstop posted Fri Dec 13 2002 15:59:17 by US A333 PIT
Delta L1011 On ATL-MCO And MCO-ATL posted Sun Dec 31 2000 00:24:03 by Lufthansa747