Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Market For Slower Aircraft?  
User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1990 times:

Seems to me that there might be a market for slower aircraft on certain routes. Look at eastbound transatlantics such as JFK-LHR. Popular route - but there's just no time to get a good night's sleep.

How about someone invent an aircraft that makes the crossing in 10 hours. That'll be enough time to have an evening dinner on board, maybe watch a movie, then settle down for a full night's sleep and arrive in London at a reasonable morning hour instead of 5:45am when there's no public transport.

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePetazulu From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 701 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1981 times:

Would you volunteer to take that plane? Just think about it!
Everyone I know (and that includes me) can't wait to get OFF of an airplane.

Maybe if the ticket was significantly (30%?) cheaper (but I don't see how it could be cheaper).


User currently offlineFlyingbronco05 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 3840 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1977 times:

People like to get from point A to point B as fast as possible. Sure, any trans atlantic plane can pull the throttles back and slow down, but people would be mad that they are late. I say make a plane that goes faster.

FB05



Never Trust Your Fuel Gauge
User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1938 times:

Yes...but don't you see? If you can get a good night's sleep, it will give you the illusion that you're only on the aircraft for a couple of hours. AND you'll wake at the other end feeling a damn sight better than on those "red eye" eastbounds - which earn their name because of the sheer tiredness you feel when you get off them.

User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1936 times:

There are a lot of people who can`t sleep in aircrafts, especially those who are traveling in the cramped Economy Class.

Patrick


User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1932 times:

All-beds it is, then... Big grin

User currently offline747-600X From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2793 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1920 times:

A token for your consideration, mi amigos -

Plans have been drawn and studies are being conducted regarding just such an aircraft, though not quite what you've got in mind. The aircraft in question would make the journey in 37 hours, but the cost would be $175 roundtrip ($90 one-way). Those of you familiar with aviation history will pick up quickly on this one. For the rest, let your imaginations wander...
Each passenger would have a cabin, similar to a hotel room though without the bathroom. This would include twin-size bed, two sitting chairs, a table, and a flatscreen (for weight's sake) TV.



"Mental health is reality at all cost." -- M. Scott Peck, 'The Road Less Traveled'
User currently offlineArrow From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 2676 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1906 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Sounds like a Zeppelin. Good idea! Everybody talks about hydrogen being the fuel of the future -- here's a great application of the concept. No smoking, of course.


Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1904 times:

slower aircraft... that's what the A340 is for! Big grin

User currently offlineAvObserver From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 2472 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1893 times:

Maybe they should just put the trusty (or is that rusty?) old DC-3 back into passenger service. Is THAT slow enough for you? Or maybe Boeing should now design a 'super-slow' airplane to complement the 7E7/super-efficient. They could call it, the REALLY SUB-Subsonic Cruiser, puttering along at a barely hair-ruffling .095 mach. Driving there might actually be faster! Big grin

User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1877 times:

There have been some studies by DARPA and Boeing on a plane called the "Pelican". It would travel at around 300 knots, and have a 4500 mile range over land. Over water, it would fly close to the ground and ride on the cushion of air that is created when an airplane with large wings flys close to the surface. This technique allows a range over water of 10,000+ miles. The plane would be unpressurized since it would travel at altitudes where pressurization is not necessary. The lack of pressurization greatly simplifies the design and prolongs airframe life.

The thing would be HUGE. It would have 8 ship-sized gas turbines powering four propellers. It would be capable of carrying 17 full-sized main battle tanks (for comparison, the C-17 can only carry one of these). These tanks weigh well over 50 tons. Boeing is also looking into using it for the civilian cargo market. It would be able to use ordinary airports and freight handling facilities. No word on anyone planning passenger service........


User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7780 posts, RR: 16
Reply 11, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1831 times:

So I spend 4 more hours in a plane in exchange for sleep. I'd rather get those 4 additional hours to get a full days work in NY, be able to grab a quick dinner, and be able to make it to the airport and grab my flight to London.

I seriously doubt the premise that a slower plane is cheaper to develop and cheaper to operate. A ground effect, transoceanic plane would be incredibly susceptible to weather over the oceans. I thought the entire point of flying in the stratosphere was to get above the weather.

As for moving large tonnages over freight overseas... cargo ships will be able to fulfill that role cheaply and safely for the time being.



Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineDelta-flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2676 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1831 times:

Why reinvent the wheel? Let's bring back the Connies and Stratocruisers.

Pete


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mel Lawrence


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Clinton Lincoln



User currently offlineAviatsiya From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1804 times:

There have been some studies by DARPA and Boeing on a plane called the "Pelican".

There were some studies by the Soviets also back in the 1960s. The difference between their studies and Boeing's studies is that the Soviet design is the only one which will probably ever exist  Wink/being sarcastic




Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A New Market For Larger Aircraft? posted Fri Sep 14 2001 23:29:18 by SSTjumbo
Engine Market Leaders For Different Aircraft Types posted Sat Mar 25 2006 21:45:45 by 1337Delta764
Why Do Pilots Get Paid More For Bigger Aircraft? posted Mon Feb 19 2007 22:58:58 by Sacamojus
CX Seeks US$300m For New Aircraft posted Sun Feb 11 2007 10:16:02 by Zeke
Best Website For Specific Aircraft Data posted Wed Feb 7 2007 02:47:03 by Flybynight
NAS To Sign Deal For 19 Aircraft Soon. posted Thu Feb 1 2007 08:55:01 by Manni
Airlines With RFPs For New Aircraft posted Fri Jan 5 2007 21:11:50 by Naritaflyer
Market For GA Pilots In Germany posted Tue Dec 12 2006 22:19:40 by QF772
What Is The European Job Market For Pilots Like? posted Sat Nov 25 2006 02:42:57 by JAM747
Scanner Frequencies For Hobart Aircraft? posted Sun Nov 5 2006 08:47:02 by 3green