United777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1657 posts, RR: 0 Posted (12 years 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4781 times:
Why do so many airlines want to fly into Baghdad so much. Is there really that big of a market into Baghdad or do you think it is just for publicity. Northwest Airlines, North American Airlines, British Airways, Virgin Atlantic Airways, Lufthansa Airlines, Emirate Airlines and Qatar Airways are asking for right to fly into Iraq. I could see why the the middle eastern airlines would want to fly into Baghdad but I don't see why European or North American airlines would want to so quickly. Will these airlines actually make a profit flying into Baghdad.
Also when these airlines are asking permission who are they asking since Iraqi does not yet have a aviation authority.
United777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1657 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4747 times:
Pacificjourney - That is a good question and heck yea Baghdad would be a good transit/hub for any airline. Baghdad has always been called the center of the crossroads between Europe, Asia and Africa. It is right in the middle. It is kinda the reason why Iraq or Baghdad use to be such a rich and wealthy city. It is sad to see Iraq during Saddams regime because it could have such a wealthy and modern country. Anyway I think Iraqi Airways has the perfect place (Baghdad) to make a world hub in the future.
Aroundtheworld From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 279 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4712 times:
Personally I see it as a huge untapped market. Basically imagine a city the size of LA with no air service. Yea they may loose a bit at first...but once business travel for a newly established economy kicks in and god knows there will be plenty of tourist wanting to look around (I know I'd love to be one of the first to fly in)....watch out...that place is a goldmine waiting to happen.
Sk From Germany, joined Apr 2003, 75 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4628 times:
As far as I know - Germany has a strong commercial connection to Iraq because of the medical and pharmaceutical deliveries and the human aid goods. A lot of companies had contracts before the war and I would not be surprised that this will be the same with the new leaders in Iraq.
Don't forget that Iraq is the 2nd largest oil producing country in the world. So there is a lot of room for good business.
Swissgabe From Switzerland, joined Jan 2000, 5266 posts, RR: 32
Reply 8, posted (12 years 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 4488 times:
Do you really thing that there is such a BIG market for airlines?
In my opinion most airlines have other problems than thinking of flying to Baghdad and try to make some money (or to loose some). Most carriers are very careful with adding new destinations to their network without a intensive study.
Smooth as silk - Royal Orchid Service /// Suid-Afrikaanse Lugdiens - Springbok
N79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (12 years 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 4327 times:
"Because it sounds and looks good... all about image...."
But if that were true, then there would have been some commercial flights into Kabul as well. I don't think that is the reason. Before the Gulf War, Baghdad was an important destination because of its size and relative wealth. I think Baghdad will become an important destination once again as soon as the economy gets moving.
RayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8152 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (12 years 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 4256 times:
I think Baghdad will be one very busy airport in a few years as construction workers arriving to rebuild Iraq's infrastructure show up on a large scale. We're very fortunate that one of the few lavish things Saddam Hussein did that will outlast him was to build that very modern airport with long runways and modern terminals.
By 2010, Baghdad could be quite a busy airport because Iraq has many major historic sites that could be opened to tourism.
PROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5644 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (12 years 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 4180 times:
Baghdad may be (or have the potential to once again become) an important city, but I just don't foresee any direct flights by U.S. carriers. Figure it this way, the only U.S. carrier serving the Middle East is CO into TLV.
"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
EurostarVA From Bahrain, joined May 2002, 1296 posts, RR: 7
Reply 18, posted (12 years 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 4148 times:
Airlines are rushing to fly into Baghdad because they know it will be a lucrative route not to be missed. If you look at all the Iraqis living overseas (of which a lot are relatively educated and wealthy), they would surly love to fly back home to visit family and friends and savor the reality of post-Saddam Iraq. As to business traffic, yes, there is a LOT of it developing. It is only natural for an airline like KLM, which has flown to various cities in the Middle East for decades, to add Baghdad to its route network. Same for Lufthansa and British Airways.
On the long run (perhaps summer 2004), I expect these airlines to be flying into Baghdad:
- Gulf Air
- Royal Jordanian
- British Airways
- Turkish Airlines
- Air France (Would there be enough business traffic for this one?!?!?!)
- Aeroflot (same as above)
- Northwest (applied already)
STT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 17094 posts, RR: 50
Reply 20, posted (12 years 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 4127 times:
In the begining the flights are going to get lots of folks heading to Iraq as aide workers, contractors in the rebuilding, and former exiles/expatriots with ties to Iraq.
7 years down the road Iraq could be a much different place than it is now, with it's oil reserves and skilled and educated population they are going to one day rival the United Arab Emirates, Qartar, Kuwait and Bahrain as a prosperous and developing country.
Not saying they are all going to be driving BMWs and Hummer H-2s in ten years, but I think they are going to see a HUGE investment and development starting within the next two years.
First things first, the new Government has to get up and running and the services have to be retsored and an effective Iraqi Civil Defense force organzied and deployed.
Most US troops will be out of Iraq within a year, however long term I think the US is going to sign a long term lease agreement with the new Government giving the US "access rights" to as many as 4 bases (mostly airbases).
The first base would be on part of the current Baghdad international airport, it would be for VIP/Government flights and heavey C-17s, C-5s etc.. It would function alongside the civilian air services like Frankfurt.
The second would be near Nasariya, and would serve as a US Marine/Navy airfield with mostly helios and visiting P-3s, Harriers, F-18s etc.
The 3rd airbase would be in the Western Desert of Iraq at a former Iraqi airbase know as h-3 or h-2? It would serve as a Special ops training facility.
And the fourth would either be at a former Iraqi air base on the Eastern edge of Baghdad know as (tallill airbase?), or in Northern Iraq possibly in Tekrit or Mosul.
The fourth base would be a USAF base for F-15s etc.
Also the British are likely to setup a Naval station at Um Qasar and possibly a Royal Marine post at Basara.
These bases would be jouint coalition and Iraqi military, it will be interesting to see what the "new" Iraqi Air Force will look like.
Leezyjet From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 4043 posts, RR: 53
Reply 23, posted (12 years 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 4026 times:
"Just think of the yields flights into Baghdad will be getting between aide works, reconstruction personal, military personal, tourists, etc."
Think you hit the nail on the head there LV.
The potential for making money on that route is huge, as you said there will be lots and lots of people going to Iraq to help rebuilding as well as all the exiles returning to visit friends and relatives. The Iraqi people themselves that have hardly been able to travel anywhere will be another source of revenue as they begin to travel the world again. Also don't forget cargo. There will be tonnes and tonnes of stuff being flown into Iraq in the next few years as rebuilding begins.
Iraq now is basically like the rest of the Middle East in the late 70's/80's - a huge pot of cash waiting to be opened. I think thats why the airlines are so keen to start flying there.
"CO's ties to Houston makes it a strong possiblity that they would launch flights to Baghdad"
Or they could tie in with a VS service as they do with the LGW-PHC route that has just started. That was one of the reasons why VS started that route from LGW, so they could tie in with the oil workers coming from IAH.
"She Rolls, 45 knots, 90, 135, nose comes up to 20 degrees, she's airborne - She flies, Concorde Flies"
Ti717 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 227 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (12 years 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3997 times:
You also have to think that an airline could get the route now and hold on to it. Either not fly it or a once a week flight until the market improves. The a airline all over holding on to routes to use on a sunny day.
Fly Texas International!!
Sir, don't you think we should turn on the runway lights?" "No, that's just what there expecting us to do!"
: - Emirates - Qatar - Gulf Air - Saudi - Royal Jordanian - EgyptAir - British Airways - KLM - Lufthansa - Turkish Airlines - Air France (Would there be
: OK Guys, dream on! There's so much more in the factual world than dreaming!
: I heard gas is really cheap and the information minister is the air traffic controller "NO Northwest 1234, follow the infidel to the marker and then p
: In the mid 80's Baghdad had plenty of air servide. I actually flew a Korean air from Bahrein into Baghdad in 1984 back when the US was selling food pr
: The Detroit area is home to the largest Iraqi population in the United States. I'm sure that has something to do with Northwest's interest in flying t