Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Does Qantas Use Their A330's For Cityflyer?  
User currently offlineApollo13 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5821 times:

Why does qantas use the A330 for cityflyer services and not the 767's?

32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMELflyer From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 9 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5771 times:

QF use both the A330 and 767 for CityFlyer services as well as other aircraft types. The A330 are the only aircraft to have the CityFlyer logos painted on them.

Cheers


User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2391 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5776 times:

The 300+ passenger capacity of the A330 is vital to move peak hour loads on the CityFlyer routes. On Perth routes it negates the need for a 747 to carry the load, except during holiday periods.
The 767 and 737 adequately operate the other services.


User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5763 times:

Does QF use any of the A330's on international routes? Or does it plan to use any A330's on INTL routes sometime? It seems a bit of a waste to have this type just doing short domestic runs.

User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2391 posts, RR: 24
Reply 4, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5757 times:

Qantas' order for A330-300s includes internationally configured aircraft to operate regional routes, however with the current Asian downturn it is likely these aircraft will be deferred.
The A330-200s are strictly domestic aircraft with a high density seating configuration.


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5752 times:

A332s are domestic, A333s will be international

User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5334 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5654 times:

Last I heard was that 5 A333's were for international and the other 4 for Domestic.

If it's only 5 International configured A333's I wonder where they will fly?? Asia mainly I guess, any chance for them on Trans Tasman?


User currently offlineQFTJT From Australia, joined Dec 2000, 278 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5408 times:

>>AJ: The A330-200s are strictly domestic aircraft with a high density seating configuration.

How can you say that an aircraft with over 8,000Km to 11,850 kilometres of range is strictly domestic. I don't think so. Average sector lengths of the worlds A330-200 aircraft is 4000nm. The A330-200 was designed for is long range and the A330-300 for long to medium range. It certainly does not make sense why Qantas are flying them on such short routes. The 737-900 would be better suited to these cityflyer routes.


User currently offlineBNE From Australia, joined Mar 2000, 3183 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5404 times:

A330-200 are used on the peak Sydney-Melbourne flights, flights to Perth. Sydney-Melbourne is around the third most popular route in the world and Qantas with only Virgin Blue flying 737s can easily fill them up. As Virgin bring on more frequency and large planes then Qantas may downgrade to 767, but for now A330-200 is it.




Why fly non stop when you can connect
User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2391 posts, RR: 24
Reply 9, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5400 times:

QFTJT, as the thread is about the Qantas A330s I am referring to the Qantas A330-201s, they have been configured purely for domestic operations, a 301 seat A330 is not suitable for long distance flights.
It makes perfect sense to fly them domestically as they are an ideally sized and economical aircraft, Qantas has not taken the high weight and high powered option to make the purchase cheaper.


User currently offlineQFTJT From Australia, joined Dec 2000, 278 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5382 times:

>> It makes perfect sense to fly them domestically as they are an ideally sized and economical aircraft, Qantas.

It doesn't make sense to fly them domestically. They were never designed for this purpose. It makes more sense to fly the A330-300 domestic as are better suited for domestic operations. The A330 is not in the same category as the A300. Seeing the fleet stands at 4, I don't think this setup will last.


User currently offlineBeno From Australia, joined Aug 2002, 428 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5366 times:

I'm sure QF management know what they are doing after all they are running the world most profitable airline!

User currently offlineQFTJT From Australia, joined Dec 2000, 278 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5360 times:

Sure profitable, but I wonder why? AN?



User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 21
Reply 13, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5344 times:

QFTJT,

Like AJ has pointed out during peak periods on popular routes there is a high demand in seats and the A330 can be configured to seat a certain amount to fit the traffic demand and the A330 is a very economical aircraft to do it, so why not? And as mentioned the A332 Qantas bought were of a lower MTOW and lower thrust-rated version.

the A333s will then do regional routes, and bonds a certain fleet commonality?

Cheers



Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5312 times:

So apparently, even with that large wing, the -200's can be used economically on routes under 2000 miles?


User currently offlineHoons90 From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 3017 posts, RR: 52
Reply 15, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5309 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

QFTJT, I believe all of Qantas' A330-200s are A330-201s, excluding one that is an A330-203(202?). IIRC the A330-201s can only fly no more than 5000kms. The A330-203 VH-EBB flew Toulouse-Melborune nonstop IIRC.


The biggest mistake made by most human beings: Listening to only half, understanding just a quarter and telling double.
User currently offlineQANTAS747 From Australia, joined Mar 2000, 222 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5291 times:

You ask why they use them, I ask why not?.
First of all the passenger and cargo increase on these busy routes. And also because it is the new flagship of domestic. It is very comfortable and offers high standard, not to mention faster loading/unloading times with dual airbridges.
And yes QF will use the 201's on domestic only.
The new 300's will come with Total Entertainment, and (hopefully) new business class seats. I would think that the new 300's would replace 767's on international routes. and the 767's on international duties would be transferred to domestic, and therfore the retirement of the 762's will happen.
So, in the future I would expect to see the 333's on Japan, HK, SIN and some Trans-tasman flights.

It is all part of this fleet restructuring thing and associated works going on, wherby all 733's will be All economy (slimline seats) and 734's with 20 permanent J class seats. 73H's in a 12/156 config and millenium and slimline seating.

Anyway, back to the topic, overall the 200's are used purely domestic because of their ability to carry more Pax in peaks and also because they are more economical therefore QF can offer more of the cheap seats to compete better with Virgin.


User currently offlineTsentsan From Singapore, joined Jan 2002, 2016 posts, RR: 15
Reply 17, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5290 times:

Howdy Hoons,

Correct VH-EBD went n/s TLS-MEL. But VH-EBC a -201 also went nonstop Toulouse to Melbourne. I'm not sure about VH-EBD but I think it stopped in SIN.




NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2391 posts, RR: 24
Reply 18, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 5249 times:

They are all A330-201s.
Tsentsan, it was VH-EBB that went non-stop first, setting a record. VH-EBD stopped in Singapore to pick up freight. Finger trouble?


User currently offlineTsentsan From Singapore, joined Jan 2002, 2016 posts, RR: 15
Reply 19, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 5225 times:

Ops! Apologies.... *embarassed*...

Yes thanks AJ for that.. I apologies EBB did direct non-stop.



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineGroobster From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 310 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 5222 times:

Anyone know which was the first commercial A330 flight for Qantas?

I flew on VH-EBA from MEL-SYD on DEC 31st at 12.30pm (it was late), the staff on board were very upbeat about their new shiny Airbus, and the fact that the Australians built the lower doors (or something).

I was surprised to fly on that plane, as they weren't expected to go into commercial service until early 2003.

It had to go as high as 41000ft to avoid the terrible turbulence!



Next flights: MAN-IST-AUH-MAN
User currently offlineQFTJT From Australia, joined Dec 2000, 278 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 5152 times:

What other airlines in the world use A330's for only sectors around the 1 hours mark?

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 84
Reply 22, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 5146 times:

Saying that the 737-900 is a more appropriate aircraft compared to the A330-200 is hardly a logical statement. A 180 seat aircraft vs. a 301 seat aircraft does not a comparison make.

The A330-201 is a very weak aircraft, only 64k pounds of thrust, and QF has been very, very pleased with them from all accounts. They're not set up for long range routes.

I don't know why you'd say the A330-300 is better suited for domestic, although it too is well suited. QF plans to deploy the A330-300 on regional international routes but also has switched some A330-200 orders for more A330-300s, and some of those configured for domestic routes.

The fleet doesn't "stand" at 4, there are 13 planes on order.

Anyway, QF wanted a larger plane than the 767. The 767-300ER certainly wasn't designed for domestic operations, but Asian carriers fly them on super-short stage lengths.

The 330s were specifically ordered for the CityFlyer service.

N


User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 5115 times:

Back when Delta was looking for a replacement for the L-1011, they actually considered the A330-200, before deciding on the 767-400. Delta flies the 767-400 on some short routes, like ATL-MCO/FLL/TPA, which are under 2 hours in length. These type flights are similar to what Qantas using the A330-200 on.

User currently offlineTsentsan From Singapore, joined Jan 2002, 2016 posts, RR: 15
Reply 24, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5070 times:

The 767-300ER certainly wasn't designed for domestic operations, but Asian carriers fly them on super-short stage lengths.

Interesting comment. There arent too many Asian carriers that fly the 767, and trying to recall only Brunei, Eva and Air China fly them. I dont really see these 3 airlines doing super short flights with the 767s, assuming your super short flights are anything less than 1 hour.

The 767-300ER was designed for medium-long haul flights, mostly trans-atlantic. However, you get airlines like Air NZ doing SIN-AKL (a 11 hr flight) with them, while Qantas makes the 767-300ER do MEL-SYD on a 1 hr flight. Actually, it shows the versatility of the aircraft to be able to operate almost all kinds of flights  Smile Same goes for the 777.



NO URLS in signature
25 Post contains images Airbus Lover : Other Asian B767 operators I can think of:- Gulf Air Vietnam Airlines Japan Air Lines Asiana China Eastern (new operator) Hainan Airlines Air Do Hokka
26 Positive rate : I agree with QFTJT on this one. SYD-MEL is an extremely short sector for even this aircraft. I could understand it if QF only used this type for long
27 Gigneil : The A321 has a one class capacity of 220, but about 185 or so 2 class. Starmark in Japan flies their domestic sectors with 767-300ERs, as does UA in t
28 QFTJT : Gigneil, why is my statement about the 737-900 not logical? Of course they do not make a comparison because they are totally different categories. The
29 Thadocta : Something which *some* of you (but by no means ALL of you) seem to be missing is that QF needed an aircraft with a greater seating capacity than a 763
30 Sllevin : Big wing or not, there's more to making money than having *precisely* the right aircraft on a route. After all, if I said "what the most effective mac
31 PER744 : To all those people complaining that the routes are too short, you might want to have a look with what they've been doing with 747's in Japan for many
32 Vfw614 : Funny to hear that A330-200s should not do "domestics". "Domestic" is the most misleading phrase in this context I could imagine. The domestic market
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Does BA Use T3 At LHR For Phl? posted Fri Oct 6 2000 14:57:52 by ContinentalEWR
On What Routes Does AirTran Use Their 737's? posted Thu Jan 19 2006 01:44:04 by MainRunway
Why Does Taca Have Their A/c With N Registrations posted Tue Aug 23 2005 04:00:50 by Snaiks
Why Does CO Hike Up Fares For Elite Member's?! posted Sun Aug 7 2005 17:25:27 by B727fan
Why Does UA Use 2-5-2 Seating? posted Wed Jan 5 2005 19:35:11 by Swisskloten
Why Does Lufthansa Use The Crane As Its Symbol? posted Thu Jun 17 2004 06:50:58 by Kevin752
What Route Does Qantas Use Its 767ER's On? posted Sat May 15 2004 19:20:22 by Airbus3801
Why Does JAT Use The DC-10 On European Routes? posted Tue Mar 23 2004 21:24:45 by Vio
Why Does WN Use 737-700 On SMF-ONT? posted Sun Nov 2 2003 22:58:11 by JetsGo
Why Does Everyone Want To Work For An Airline posted Thu Jun 12 2003 07:39:16 by Bruce