Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
NG Boeing 757-250ER, Would It Have Been A Succes?  
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3616 times:

Would there have been a market for a 757NG -250 ?

B757 was never really upgraded/refreshed, 757-300 seems to be a strech to far.

Specs :
- range 4500-5200 NM
- full 737NG cockpit commonality
- capasity 220 in 2 class config
- newer version of PW and RR engines
- 757-300 wings and undercarriage
- winglets for modern look
- 737NG interiors

Investment would not have been too dramatic for Boeing ...


5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3548 times:

full 737NG cockpit commonality

Why bother? By doing this you alienate EVERY 757 operator!! Surely these would be the key customers?

winglets for modern look

Nothing like looks to make a plane fly better...


User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13767 posts, RR: 61
Reply 2, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3542 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Why bother? By doing this you alienate EVERY 757 operator!! Surely these would be the key customers?

For that matter, you alienate every 737-900 operator who bought them because they wanted almost 757 capacity with 737 economics and commonality.



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3527 times:

For that matter, you alienate every 737-900 operator who bought them because they wanted almost 757 capacity with 737 economics and commonality.

Name a 737-900 customer that is looking for an aircraft significantly bigger. Remember it's not just the flight deck, there are countless other systems. Having a hybrid is stupid -- a 737NG flight deck will put off current 757 operators (who need to retrain their crews) but also put off 737 operators who wouldnt want a new aircraft with different engines and systems in their fleet.


User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13767 posts, RR: 61
Reply 4, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3520 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I think you're missing my point. I'm agreeing that a 757NG wouldn't make much sense, as Boeing has produced the 737-900 (and is developing the longer-range 737-900X) for carriers who might want near-757 performace, but can't justify adding an entirely different fleet type.

One such customer is the -900 launch customer, Alaska Airlines. They could benefit from 757s in the fleet, but the cost of crew training, spares, etc all makes it prohibitive. Buying the -900, with seating capacity close to that of the 757, makes perfect financial sense. They already have a large 737 fleet, so commonality is there. They just want longer range and more seats than the -400 offers. The -700 has long legs, but not the capacity they might like...hence the development of the -900X.



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineEssentialPowr From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1820 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3495 times:

Seating capacity is only part of the equation. The MGTOW of the -900 is about 175,000 lbs as compared to 255,000 lbs for the 757. If Alaska thought they needed a heavier or longer range a/c, they'd buy it...Particularly now, when prices have to be very low.

I've stated this countless times: DOCs for an a/c are in DIRect proportion to MGTOW. Airlines essentially determine how much weight they want to carry over what distances, and buy an a/c that meets their needs. The 737 and 757 are different assembly lines, and "creating" an a/c from component parts isn't nearly as easy as it sounds.



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Would DL Have Been Better Keeping Their MD-11s posted Sun Jul 16 2006 15:50:23 by RobertS975
Would AC Have Been Better Off In Oneworld? posted Sun Jun 5 2005 09:06:33 by CXYYZ
ANSETT... Would It Have Survived? posted Fri Apr 30 2004 08:55:55 by Airbear
What Would CityBird Have Been Like? posted Mon Aug 4 2003 17:22:59 by L.1011
Columbia Memorial, Wouldn't It Have Been Neat If.. posted Wed Feb 5 2003 00:49:05 by Boeing nut
What Flight Would This Have Been? posted Sun Jan 21 2001 01:17:21 by Matt D
What Would An Updated 757 Have Been Like? posted Sun Mar 16 2008 10:16:39 by DL767captain
The Boeing 2707; What Could Have Been? posted Wed Aug 25 2010 15:38:14 by Squid
Would DL Have Benefited From The 757-300? posted Sat Aug 21 2010 19:20:43 by FlyASAGuy2005
Would It Be Feasable To Have A Bi-Plane Airliner? posted Tue Oct 16 2007 02:45:22 by A380Heavy