Luv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12150 posts, RR: 47
Reply 1, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1469 times:
I myself like CO over DL tho that is a personal opinion as I have always had better service with CO than with DL. That said if you stay all DL do they not code share with AF and you would get more miles? And save money it looks like. After all it is only 2 domestic flights and you are flying AF over the pond. Which has the planes you would like to fly on? Who offers more to keep you busy flying the longest? AF or SK.
Mcmahonsmr From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 318 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1461 times:
You have to ask yourself some questions?
1. Do you have a mileage account with any of the above?
2. How much of connection hassle do you want to deal with? CDG and ATL are very big airports!! EWR is big but totally manageable.
3. How badly do you want to fly on the SK 340? Is the SK flight the 763 or the 340??
I think once you answer those you will come up with an answer.
Sllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1458 times:
Is flying to MIA an option? Certainly you could skip one hop (i.e., just go GOT-CDG-MIA) doing so, and MIA is just 20 miles from FLL. It might also open up some other alternatives like LH, AZ, KL, and IB, for example.
And from a spotting perspective, MIA is far cooler than FLL.
GOTbound From Sweden, joined Oct 2006, 94 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1400 times:
Thanks for all the replies, I have flow directly to MIA a couple of times with AF and BA, hate the drive to and from Fort Lauderdale and I also want to try some new routes... I think it's going to be AF since I'm in there's FF program, and like there transatlantic service. I just don't have any experience with the domestic US market...