Positive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1 Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1960 times:
I love the 767 too, both the -200 and the -300. It's the biggest twin jet i've been on so i can't compare it to the 777 or the A330. The -200 is the rocketship version, very powerful engines with only a short fuselage.
Ha763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3550 posts, RR: 6 Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 1922 times:
I've been on the -300 and -400 and loved it. Most of the flights I've been on have been packed and it never really felt cramped, unlike some other planes. Truthfully, I couldn't tell much difference between the climb rate between the two.
Salvation From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 175 posts, RR: 0 Reply 5, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1883 times:
I fly on the 764, Continental's version. I love the BusinessFirst configuration and always try to get row 7-A or K (when configured that way) as you get a great view of the big engine (at least from that chair) and the wing. Then, when air borne, the raked winged tip. All very interesting. It is a quiet plane. I only wish the take-off had more power...like the 777.
Korg747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 549 posts, RR: 6 Reply 14, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1541 times:
I've been on TWA's 767-300ER a lot back in the day. Let me say they were very compatible indeed. Unlike every body, to me sometimes when the flight was packed. It felt like it doesn't want to push and also took a long time to get to a high crusing Alt. But that's just me. I like how quite they were too.