Flyingbronco05 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 3841 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted
Sat May 17 2003 03:48:01 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2339 times:
I personally love the -300. I think it is very comfortable and i would choose this plane on any routes over water or between 3-7 hours. After those 7 hours, i would go up to the 747 or 777.
I heard that it is kinda sluggish getting up to cruise, but i dont know really if that is true. My dad loved flying it. He said its an overall nice plane.
Never Trust Your Fuel Gauge
HAL From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2621 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted
Sat May 17 2003 06:21:20 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2284 times:
I've never had a bad experience with the 767-300. And as far as I can tell (especially compared to the DC-10) it's a rocketship getting up to altitude.
One smooth landing is skill. Two in a row is luck. Three in a row and someone is lying.
Positive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted
Sat May 17 2003 06:27:50 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2270 times:
I love the 767 too, both the -200 and the -300. It's the biggest twin jet i've been on so i can't compare it to the 777 or the A330. The -200 is the rocketship version, very powerful engines with only a short fuselage.
Ha763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3735 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted
Sat May 17 2003 09:41:13 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2232 times:
I've been on the -300 and -400 and loved it. Most of the flights I've been on have been packed and it never really felt cramped, unlike some other planes. Truthfully, I couldn't tell much difference between the climb rate between the two.
Salvation From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 177 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted
Sat May 17 2003 11:38:40 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2193 times:
I fly on the 764, Continental's version. I love the BusinessFirst configuration and always try to get row 7-A or K (when configured that way) as you get a great view of the big engine (at least from that chair) and the wing. Then, when air borne, the raked winged tip. All very interesting. It is a quiet plane. I only wish the take-off had more power...like the 777.
Cchan From New Zealand, joined May 2003, 1776 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted
Sat May 17 2003 14:29:10 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2130 times:
767 is the aircraft I most frequently fly on, nothing special, seems to be a reliable machine
Fanofjets From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2135 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted
Sat May 17 2003 19:18:25 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2054 times:
I flew on a
BA 767; it was a beautiful plane, very comfortable even though every seat was taken. It's an honest, hard-working aircraft both long- and short-range, which makes it my favorite.
The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth. -Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Bmacleod From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 2836 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted
Sat May 17 2003 19:24:28 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2048 times:
Every time I've booked a flight on AC, (Halifax-Toronto or Halifax-London,UK) I always get the 767! Not that I like the 767, very efficient and quiet compared to AC's fuel-hungry and noisy L1011s.
My only sad remark regarding this beautiful aircraft is that it was involved in the 9-11 attacks. [Edited 2003-05-17 19:30:12]
The engine is the heart of an airplane, but the pilot is its soul.
Zebfly2 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 417 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted
Sun May 18 2003 02:37:48 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1964 times:
I've flown on all three versions and I like them all(-200 & 300 on
AA & 200,300,400 on DL). If I had to choose 1 over the other 2 then it would be the 767-400. Updated interior makes the difference.
Educate your children before others mis-educate them!!!
767er From Australia, joined Apr 2001, 1092 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted
Sun May 18 2003 03:08:18 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1940 times:
I have flown on heaps of 767s:
QF,NZ, AA, BA. Great aircraft when fying Y. There isn't that hemmed in feeling you get on the 744.
Aircraft flown:F27,Viscount. EMB120, SAAB340, ATR70, 737-200.737-300,DC8, DC10,747-100,747-200,747-300,747-400, A320, A3
YV136C From Venezuela, joined Mar 2003, 198 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted
Sun May 18 2003 04:09:07 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1906 times:
I've flown twice on 763's (one LanChile, one Delta) and twice on 764's (DL). 764's rock! Interior is fantastic, and it's incredibly powerful!
Proud to work for Embraer FLL!
Vincent32 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted
Sun May 18 2003 04:27:02 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1895 times:
I was on a -300 last summer and the a/c was great. The cabin was roomy and spacious. The a/c just had a comfortable feel. Great plane
Ba319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8732 posts, RR: 53
Reply 13, posted
Sun May 18 2003 04:52:35 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 1873 times:
I've been lucky enough to fly on 3 engine varients:-
BA 767-300 - RR
UA 767-300 - PW
AA 767-300 - GE
US 767-200 - GE
I never used to like the 767,however I have come to like the plane,and in particular the seating,2-3-2.
I used to like using UA 777's,but have come to dislike the 2-5-2 or other airlines 3-3-3 layouts.
When travelling widebody longhaul i'd prefer any of the following over a 777 or 747:-
Korg747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 549 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted
Sun May 18 2003 06:14:14 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 1851 times:
I've been on TWA's 767-300ER a lot back in the day. Let me say they were very compatible indeed. Unlike every body, to me sometimes when the flight was packed. It felt like it doesn't want to push and also took a long time to get to a high crusing Alt. But that's just me. I like how quite they were too.
Please excuse my English!
777-200 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 1024 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted
Sun May 18 2003 06:51:10 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1841 times:
The only thing I don't like about Delta's 767's is the seats, hardly any recline and the seats were so hard! I Flew it on KCVG-EGKK and back.
Another Day, Another Dollar.... Young Jeezy
MASB747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted
Sun May 18 2003 11:26:38 UTC (12 years 8 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1773 times:
My most recent trip on a 763 was in february (
ORD- FRA).The fact that I am a B767-crazed put aside the increased legroom in AA´s coach class surely added a shred of comfort to my journey.