A388 From Netherlands Antilles, joined May 2001, 9823 posts, RR: 11 Posted (11 years 4 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2334 times:
I looked at major low-cost airline operating today and noticed they all operate 737 or A320 aircraft. I do know the 737/A320 are well suited aircraft for low-cost operations but why are there no low-cost airlines operating regional jets or turbo prop aircraft? Is there a reason why low-cost airlines operate aircraft in the 737/A320 range and not smaller (or larger) aircraft? Does it have to do with operating costs or generated revenue from the aircraft? Why does a low-cost airline does not use regional jets or turbo props to fly thinner routes where a 737/A320 is too large to use? High frequencies is one of the success factors of low-cost operations, when using a smaller aircraft on thinner routes wouldn't this allow a low-cost airline to still offer higher frequencies with higher loads because of the smaller size of regional jets/turbo props? I also know that low-cost airlines have their fleet based on one aircraft type, does it make much of a difference to operate two aircraft types, like 737 or A320 for the bussy routes and CRJ or ERJ or ATR aircraft for the thinner routes? Air Tran operates the CRJ as well (I know its a partner airline that operates on behalf of Air Tran). Is Air Tran satisfied with their CRJ operations?
I was just wondering whether the regional jet hasn't attracted the intention of low-cost airlines such as EasyJet, Ryanair, Southwest Airlines, JetBlue and the likes. Are these aircraft too small? Does their route network not allow smaller aircraft (or larger ones)? Can we see JetBlue operating the A321 in the future or EasyJet operating CRJ or ERJ aircraft on the thinner routes?
Gr8slvrflt From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 1606 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (11 years 4 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2289 times:
AirTran, through partner affiliation, is operating CRJs and will soon add A320s. The smaller CRJs have been very successful in increasing frequencies and load factors in shorter business markets. ATA has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Chicago Express, that uses Saab 340s.
Beltwaybandit From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 495 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 4 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2256 times:
My sense is that the LCCs go into the higher-volume, higher-margin routes (e.g. NY-FLA). It is also cheaper to fly 175 people on one flight than 65 people on two or three flights (fewer flight crew, ground crew, etc.).
Also, leisure flyers are less time-sensitive, so you can fill one flight to Florida with vacationers, but not expect to do the same with business travelers.
Lastly, the newest 737s and 320s are capable of coast-to-coast operations, and in the Continental US it allows one type to cover just about any route.