Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
747 As Flying Observatory  
User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1839 times:

Watching the Discovery channel last night i saw this interesting documentary about Alien life and our origins here on Earth. There was a 747 in United livery- a -100 or -200 that NASA will will fitting an enormous telescope to. The telescope will be fitted right at the back of the plane, and the fuselage will have a panel that can be opened so that observations can be made. The telescope is so big that just the reflecting mirror weighs about 20 tonnes. Air craft motion and turbulence will not be a problem as the telescope will allow for it. This will be a relatively cheap method to observe deep space free from clouds and the 747 is the perfect plane for the job  Smile Oh yeah it will be respainted in NASA livery.

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTimf From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 969 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1821 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It's a 747SP, N145UA:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Morley



You can find more information on the plane and program at http://www.united-sofia.com/.


User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1737 times:

I didn't know it was an SP, i thought it was a -100. Better the SP anyway since it's smaller and can fly higher(45,000feet). Great website btw.

User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13194 posts, RR: 77
Reply 3, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 1698 times:

Try this for size;
http://www.united-sofia.com/NAVIGATE.htm


User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10707 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 1697 times:

The NASA/DASA project is called SOFIA. The aircraft is under modification since years but now they´re short of installing the telescope so the first flight will be soon.

But sad that they repaint the SP in the extremely boring NASA colours (white and grey with a blue stripe, whow, how advanced!).


User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 1694 times:

This aircraft (747SP-21) is certificated for operations up to 45,100 feet - in airline operations - like ANY OTHER 747... but because of its lighter weight, it is capable of reaching FL 450 faster than heavier 747s...
xxx
One thing - the aircraft will be operated by NASA probably, under restricted (non standard airworthiness) category because of its modifications, and thereby will NOT BE legally restricted to 45,000 feet...
xxx
The E-4 (military version of 747) can be flown to approximately 50,000 feet, or even higher when necessary, so I am sure a 747SP could do even better, after all has the same wing, therefore same buffet speed limits...
xxx
I flew that plane when it was with PanAm, glad it got a nicer retirement than a desert aircraft cemetery...
Happy contrails  Smile
(s) Skipper


User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13194 posts, RR: 77
Reply 6, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 1692 times:

B747skipper, did you like flying the 747SP more than standard models, with the greater performance of the SP?

User currently offlineSunilgupta From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 776 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1664 times:

I flew on N145UA on its last scheduled passenger service which also happened to be the last scheduled passenger service for an SP in the US! The flight was IAD-SFO but I can't remember the flight number.

N145UA was the only SP ever placed in the new United colors.

Sunil


User currently offlineB747Skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1657 times:

Dear GDB:
Most of them were based West Coast with PanAm, I was based JFK and MIA so did not fly them much at all, the SP was nice to handle for max altitude capability, but not as pleasant (shall I say "stable") as the 100/200 -
xxx
We had a run non-stop JFK-BAH which I flew occasionally, by chance we had extra pilots, because the flight was about 14 hours long... Now with Argentina, flew extra long range with our 747-287 with 10 tanks (7Q engines), they are, as far as range, as good as the SP were. We had a SP in Argentina (ex BNF) but actually our 200s could nearly handle same flights with better payload. So they got rid of the SP hand flew the SP routes with... 200s...
xxx
Happy contrails  Smile
(s) Skipper


User currently offlineUnited_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7485 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1635 times:

Did anyone get the Quicktime videos to work ? I tried them at home & work and they don't. I did install Quicktime!


'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineBlatantEcho From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1904 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1564 times:

Watching it now United_Fan, it takes a while to load, but it works fine.

George



They're not handing trophies out today
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8706 posts, RR: 43
Reply 11, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1534 times:

An interesting project, especially since there's a lot of information in German available!  Big grin By the way, does anyone know if they're really going to expose the entire telescope bay to the air in flight? I still wonder if the device and the airframe could withstand the turbulences/wake. On the other hand, what could they put there? Glass would be too delicate and probably to heavy... Any ideas?


Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (11 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1499 times:

>>>>>>>By the way, does anyone know if they're really going to expose the entire telescope bay to the air in flight? I still wonder if the device and the airframe could withstand the turbulences/wake. On the other hand, what could they put there? Glass would be too delicate and probably to heavy... Any ideas?


I was thinking the exact same thing. I highly doubt the telescope will be directly exposed to the slipstream, that would be impossible at 500MPH and 45,000+ feet. More than likely it will be some kind of silicate compound or special glass.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Booking Same Day As Flying On FR Or EZY posted Tue Nov 14 2006 04:04:30 by Scouse
Boeing: Think Of 747-8 As 787XL posted Mon Jul 17 2006 14:56:08 by VV701
Any Airlines Besides AS Flying The B. 732 Combi? posted Fri May 27 2005 00:08:22 by Bushpilot
Where Will The Special MAS 747 Be Flying To? posted Tue Apr 5 2005 08:52:48 by G-KIRAN
Did Surinam Airways' 747 Start Flying Already? posted Mon Aug 9 2004 15:30:14 by A388
Interesting Video - 747 As Fire Bomber posted Mon Jul 19 2004 20:58:53 by Airmech
Pros & Cons Of AS Flying Widebodys posted Sun Jul 11 2004 10:46:51 by Squirrel83
747 Pilots Flying 777 posted Sun May 2 2004 22:29:30 by Soaringadi
Oldest 747 Still Flying posted Sat Apr 10 2004 13:48:00 by DABZF
Business Jets As Flying Billboards? posted Wed Dec 24 2003 21:13:58 by Flyf15