Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Any Further Word On AA's Proposed ORD-HKG?  
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3345 times:

*disclaimer: sorry to be the deceased nag, but curious as to this topic*

Any further word on AA's proposed ORD-HKG? With SARS on the decline, a new HKG codeshare implimented, as well as a handful of incoming 772ERs (and nowhere to really fly them)... I'm wondering if they still have such a flight in the making?

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3299 times:

I am sure that AA is watching the situation closely, but opening a new route such as ORD-HKG at this moment would be risky. Airlines are just starting to re-instate existing routes to the Far East and it will take months until existing carriers are flying a full schedule on established routes. CO, for example, is going to try to re-start EWR-HKG in August, bookings look OK but the fares are still quite low.

Look for AA to use its newly delivered 777s on more established routes to Europe, revising equipment on certain routes.


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3294 times:

Look for AA to use its newly delivered 777s on more established routes to Europe

Would they....? Europe is also saturated with competition... and indeed when AA decided to pospone/cancel LAX-AA), Japan">NRT, they chose to fly the re-scheduled Triple7s domestically rather than place them on Euro-runs.


****

CX cannot seem to get its act together concerning its continually proposed nonstop HKG-NYC flights (though, I often wonder why they'd want to, considering that the JFK-YVR reportedly does very well for them).

Perhaps AA may consider that route as well, with its incoming fleet. Though, the performance of their JFK-AA), Japan">NRT may dissuade them from doing so  Sad

[Edited 2003-06-21 19:58:25]

User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16694 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3246 times:

"CX cannot seem to get its act together concerning its continually proposed nonstop HKG-NYC flights (though, I often wonder why they'd want to, considering that the JFK-YVR reportedly does very well for them"

Hopefully when CX launches their NYC-HKG nonstop they will keep the YVR, and perhaps switch one of their NYC flights to EWR. Most major International airlines that serve NYC serve both EWR and JFK, like Singapore.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineL.1011 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 2209 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3241 times:

I didn't even know it was proposed.

User currently offlineSegmentKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3197 times:

Can a 777 even fly ORD-HKG? UA's 747-400 is already tanked off to the max on the route..

-n


User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5478 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3167 times:

SegmentKing- Continental puts it's 777s on EWR-HKG. AA can surely do ORD-HKG with a 777, while it is a long flight, it is possible.

My question regarding CX HKG-JFK, if CO can do EWR-HKG with a 777, I do not understand why the A346 cannot make it non stop. Is CX allowed to carry pax JFK-YVR who are not continuing to HKG?

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineThe777Man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 6414 posts, RR: 55
Reply 7, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3143 times:

SegmentKing: With the new polar air routes thru Russia, the flights are not as long and therefore range is less of a problem. The days of towing the 744 for UA 895 to the runway at ORD are gone since about two years ago. Would think AA should open some new routes with their 777s and perhaps they will start ORD-HKG in the fall when demand to HKG has recovered ? Or perhaps restart flights to TPE from SJC ? That seems less likely since they again have downsized at SJC. The777Man


Need a Boeing 777 Firing Order....Further to fly...T5, CI, MU, LX and LH 777s
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3095 times:

Can a 777 even fly ORD-HKG? UA's 747-400 is already tanked off to the max on the route..

Why shouldnt it... considering that a high-powered 772ER is currently the longest ranged aircraft in scheduled commercial service; considerably longer-legged than 744s and 744ERs.

AA's ships carry relatively small pax loads and utilize Trent892s, they could easily get the job done.


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3094 times:

Is CX allowed to carry pax JFK-YVR who are not continuing to HKG?

Yes, and (oddly enough) it's said to be one of their most profitable routings


User currently offlineAFa340-300E From France, joined May 1999, 2084 posts, RR: 26
Reply 10, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 3073 times:

Hello,


ORD-HKG is probably going to happen sometime down the road. But the economci situtation and temporary loss of traffic due to SARS are srtongly playing against it happeninng anytime soon.

I had an article on AA's Asia operations on my website, published in October 2002 but still available.

BTW, R-R and AA celebrated this week the million-hour mark milestone at Paris on the 777/Trent 800 at the carrier. Is their plan to have one single configuration on all the 777s still on?



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Matthew Willmott-Sharp



Best regards,
Alain Mengus
ATB - Paris Air Show 2003


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 11, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 3071 times:

My question regarding CX HKG-JFK, if CO can do EWR-HKG with a 777, I do not understand why the A346 cannot make it non stop.

It certainly can, at least as well as CO's underpowered 772ERs can.

I think CX just also has very optimistic cargo requirements.

N


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 3045 times:

Is their plan to have one single configuration on all the 777s still on?

AA threw an incredible tantrum when GE won exclusivity on the 777NGs.... it sent lobbyists in an attempt to convince Boeing's board to override the decision, and later even threatened to order A345s. Boeing/GE would have to come up with a sweet little package to get them to switch.

AA could however upgrade some of its incoming 772ERs from Trent892 to Trent895... it would certainly be a boost for that slow-selling engine variant, though AA has given no indication that it's within their interest to do so.


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 3040 times:

speaking of AA's RR-related temper tantrums....

anyone else notice that PW4000 users (JL, NH, KE, VN, ...[and stated by] UA) seem to have no problem with introducing GE90-powered 777s into their otherwise PW-powered 777 fleets; but Trent800 users (SQ, AA, CX, MH) seem to all have strongly objected??

Odd. Is there any underlying reason? The PW4000 and GE90 seem to be as fundamentally different as the Trent800 and GE90, so why the objection?


User currently offlineThe777Man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 6414 posts, RR: 55
Reply 14, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 3023 times:

From what I heard, CX was VERY close to order 777-300ER just before the problems with SARS started. This from CX Flyboy who works for the airline. So CX must have changed their mind about the GE90-115B.

The777Man



Need a Boeing 777 Firing Order....Further to fly...T5, CI, MU, LX and LH 777s
User currently offlineHkg82 From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2002, 1245 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2912 times:

Yeah I’ve heard JFK-YVR-JFK is a very profitable sector for CX. I do wonder, if CX did start a direct HKG-JFK-HKG A346 service, would they still keep YVR-JFK-YVR? I would think the vast majority of passengers on the YVR-JFK & JFK-YVR legs originate from HKG & JFK. I doubt CX captures a lot of the traffic between YVR & JFK. There are probably at least 4-5 daily flights on a number of airlines (AC, UA, AA, etc.) between the two cities & such flights are more attractive to the business traveler compared to the 1 daily flight CX offers.

I believe Don Carty himself said last year (he was quoted in the HK-based South China Morning Post) that AA would be flying to HKG from ORD with the 777-200ER by the end of 2003. But with SARS & AA’s financial problems, it’s very unlikely AA would start the route at this time.

Hkg82.


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2859 times:

I doubt CX captures a lot of the traffic between YVR & JFK

I've heard quite the opposite... which stands to reason as correct, considering for a route to be profitable, high-yield O&D is typically required.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 17, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2831 times:

You know, if AA has such a hardon for the RR engines on longhauls, why didn't they go with the RB211 on their 767s, at least on their 767-300ERs?

Is British Airways the ONLY operator of the RB211 on the 763ER? If not, they're one of two or three.

N


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2812 times:

why didn't they go with the RB211 on their 767s, at least on their 767-300ERs?

They looked into it, but the RB211 offered the lowest thrust and the highest dry weight on the 767.... both undesirable, to say the least.



Is British Airways the ONLY operator of the RB211 on the 763ER?

Nope. QF operate(d?) the type as well.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any Word On AA/CX ORD-HKG? posted Thu Aug 21 2003 01:20:42 by ConcordeBoy
Any Word On AA Adding PVD-MIA? posted Mon Oct 13 2003 16:15:25 by John
Any Further Info On The DL Shtl Smoke In Cabin? posted Thu Oct 26 2006 18:23:41 by Cpos
Any New Word On SQ Order? posted Thu May 18 2006 13:48:38 by TinkerBelle
AA / CX ORD-HKG posted Wed Jul 13 2005 03:24:46 by NomoreRJs
Scare On AA 346 ORD-LGA posted Mon Mar 1 2004 08:13:19 by Metsfan1
C3 Is History Any Official Word On Royal Airlines? posted Fri Feb 22 2002 02:04:30 by Layitontheline
Any News On The VS A340 HKG Tailstrike? posted Sat Dec 2 2006 17:40:15 by Baflyer
Why No BUR-ORD On AA Or UA? posted Fri Oct 13 2006 18:47:40 by Travelin man
Any Word On A Crash Near ACY? posted Fri Aug 4 2006 21:09:05 by Corey07850