Godbless From Sweden, joined Apr 2000, 2753 posts, RR: 16
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 1798 times:
Good news if they are making money on their flights already. I know for sure that I did not help them earn a cent yet so far...
If they manage to make money with the fairly expensive (high leasing rates)Airbuses than they might not consider downgrading to a cheaper model.
Na From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10817 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1747 times:
But: We need a cheap carrier at FRA. Germany´s largest airport, only expensive flights. Not good.
Buzz gone, Dba long gone, where is the knight in shining armour to protect us from LH´s "pharmacy"-prices?
Unique From Switzerland, joined Mar 2003, 1703 posts, RR: 35
Reply 6, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1627 times:
Swissgabe, why would Germanwings want to use Terminal B? As a low cost carrier, they're not keen on spending money for push-outs! Open parking positions is what they're looking for!
Terminal B southern stands (B32, B34, B36 and possibly B38) will probably be converted to open stand for self power taxi in and out (CRJ's, CR7's) while the northern stands (B31, B33, B35, B37) will be used for long term parking for SQ, MH, TG, SA, UL, etc.
Terminal B is already fully booked in this respect...