Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SAS And Baghdad  
User currently offlineARN From Sweden, joined Feb 2001, 267 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 6 months 21 hours ago) and read 2361 times:

Swedish radio reported some minutes ago that SAS has applied for twice weekly Copenhagen - Baghdad flights.

I wonder when services could start and what equipment will be used. I guess the distance is too long for a A321 as a nonstop service though.
The A321s were planned to serve (among others)TLV, before turmoil restarted in that area. So perhaps they could be deployed on Baghdad instead. They are used mostly on intrascandinavian routes so two runs to Iraq could probably be managed as well.
Or is SAS planning to keep the remaining 767s a little longer?

Or could CPH - Istanbul - Baghdad be possible?




22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVadheim From Norway, joined Jul 2000, 625 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 6 months 20 hours ago) and read 2296 times:

I think it would be a direct service, maybe B737-800?? Most SAS flights are direct flights, and direct point to point service has been part of their philosophy so far!


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Antonio Carrasquilla - IBERIAN SPOTTERS



User currently offlineCopenhagenboy From Denmark, joined Sep 2001, 599 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (11 years 6 months 19 hours ago) and read 2250 times:

They are not allowed to refuel in Bagdad, so it have to be with a one stop flight or a longdistance airplane.

User currently offlineTraveler_7 From Estonia, joined May 2000, 540 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 6 months 18 hours ago) and read 2227 times:

Why they are not allowed to refuel in Baghdad?

User currently offlineCPH-R From Denmark, joined May 2001, 6057 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (11 years 6 months 18 hours ago) and read 2209 times:

Because the US authorities tells them so  Wink/being sarcastic

Could it be a possible CPH-SDA-KUW-CPH routing?


User currently offlineAirsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 33
Reply 5, posted (11 years 6 months 18 hours ago) and read 2208 times:


If AF stops non-stop flights to TLV in order to prevent their crews from staying in Israel overnight, maybe SK will do somthing similar, like stopping at LCA to change crews and add fuel for LCA-SDA-LCA and LCA-CPH respectively.

>>>Why they are not allowed to refuel in Baghdad?

a) to minimise ground time in a country which is basically in the midst of a guerilla war

b) fuel is a scarce commodity in Iraq, so why not carry it in from the outside if you can?

c) lack of security equipment needed to be present when refuelling (fire trucks, ambulances etc.)

d) less-than-optimal infrastructure at SDA.

That´s what I´d come up with on first thought.

Daniel Smile


User currently offlineAirmale From Botswana, joined Sep 2004, 381 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (11 years 6 months 18 hours ago) and read 2182 times:

It will be SK's only middle eastern destination. Glad to see them back in the region.


.....up there with the best!
User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12150 posts, RR: 49
Reply 7, posted (11 years 6 months 18 hours ago) and read 2174 times:

Also I read 2 hour on the ground maximum time limit as well. And no catering at this time so you need to carry pax meals for the return trip with you.


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineCopenhagenboy From Denmark, joined Sep 2001, 599 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (11 years 6 months 17 hours ago) and read 2146 times:

I have just heard in the news they want to fly it direct 7 days in the week, but there will be a big competition, because only one company from Europe will be allowed to fly into Baghdad. BA, Lufthansa and KLM is also trying to have the route. Don't know if it is only rumors.

[Edited 2003-07-03 17:53:30]

User currently offlineCarduelis From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2001, 1586 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (11 years 6 months 16 hours ago) and read 2126 times:

http://www.britishairways.com/press/?source=RHG_press_en

Edited to say, you'll have to put 'Baghdad' in the News Releases Search box to see the article.

OK, so it is two months old, but clearly states that BA have got traffic rights.

I thought the reason of US going to Iraq was to get rid of SH, not to take over . . . !

Or maybe many of us are mistaken . . . ?



[Edited 2003-07-03 18:23:03]


Per Ardua ad Astra! ........ Honi Soit Qui Mal y Pense!
User currently offlineSAS-A321 From Denmark, joined Mar 2002, 401 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 6 months 9 hours ago) and read 2021 times:

If they were allowed to refuel in Baghdad, there would be no problems using the A321. At www.sasflightops.com I found that the max. range for the A321 is 5700km. And the great circle route to SDA is about 4000km.
But if they get the rights I think that they will use the B767...



It's Scandinavian
User currently offlineFBU 4EVER! From Norway, joined Jan 2001, 998 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (11 years 6 months ago) and read 1970 times:

SAS have only applied for traffic rights.No firm plans for operation in the foreseeable future.
A likely candidate for the operation would bee the A321,if it remains in the SAS fleet,that is.All 8 are now on the "transfer list" for sale or leasing.
The 767 is out of the question as the last one will be phased out at the end of November this year.Maintaining a fleet of one,or possibly two,would be prohibitively expensive for a twice-weekly schedule.
Most likely solution will be a MD-82/737-700 one-stop operation with Beirut,Tel Aviv,possibly Cairo as likely places.



"Luck and superstition wins all the time"!
User currently offlineVadheim From Norway, joined Jul 2000, 625 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 6 months ago) and read 1946 times:

Would'nt there be lots of security restrictions flying between Tel Aviv and Baghdad? I would think so!

User currently offlineSean-SAN- From United States of America, joined Aug 2002, 773 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (11 years 6 months ago) and read 1944 times:

CPH-Tel Aviv-Baghdad? LOL LOL LOL !!!

That's completely ridiculous!


User currently offlineFBU 4EVER! From Norway, joined Jan 2001, 998 posts, RR: 7
Reply 14, posted (11 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1900 times:

CPH-Baghdad via TLV ridiculous?well,not really!.With Israeli control on one end and U.S. control on the other,with pro-western Jordan in between,what would the problem be?


"Luck and superstition wins all the time"!
User currently offlineSAS-A321 From Denmark, joined Mar 2002, 401 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (11 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1873 times:

"The 767 is out of the question as the last one will be phased out at the end of November this year.Maintaining a fleet of one,or possibly two,would be prohibitively expensive for a twice-weekly schedule."

You are right about that... But until it is phased out they could use it...
The A321 is already flying to Beirut so it would be a possible to make a combination of that route: CPH-Beirut-Baghdad.
Very interesting to see what will happen.



It's Scandinavian
User currently offlineFBU 4EVER! From Norway, joined Jan 2001, 998 posts, RR: 7
Reply 16, posted (11 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1822 times:

Well,Beirut is a "Snowflake" destination for the time being and the most likely customers initially will be Scandinavian military,UN and diplomatic persons with completely different needs from what they get from a LCC operation like "Snowflake". Besides, SAS says the destination will be operated by SAS Airline,not "Snowflake".
A 767 operation could be technically possible,but with in excess of 200 seats not very economical and,in view of the economic situation here at SAS,highly unlikely.A direct flight with a 737-700 or -800 is possible,but with the temporary restrictions on fuel uplift rules out this option for the time being.When,or IF,the route starts up,it will most probably with a stop outside Baghdad,possibly with a third pilot as relief.



"Luck and superstition wins all the time"!
User currently offlineTransSwede From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (11 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1777 times:

Beirut, Istanbul, or Cairo sounds like the most likely 1-stop stopovers, if the route happens. But it's only my specualtion.

TLV will be politically impossible, I think.


User currently offlineAirmale From Botswana, joined Sep 2004, 381 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (11 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1768 times:

What other middle eastern destinations have SK served in the past?


.....up there with the best!
User currently offlineTransSwede From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (11 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1744 times:

They did serve Baghdad and Dubai at least...

User currently offlineAlessandro From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (11 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1705 times:

There´s a large Iraqi ex-pat market in Scandinavia (which this route are directed at) and I don´t think they would´ve like to fly to Iraq by Israel.....


User currently offlineFBU 4EVER! From Norway, joined Jan 2001, 998 posts, RR: 7
Reply 21, posted (11 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1665 times:

The Iraqi population would not be on the flights to Baghdad during the early period anyway.By the time they would start to travel,the fuel restrictions would have been lifted and direct flights will take place.
What little fuel is available in Iraq at the moment is reseved for Coalition planes and choppers.Hence the refueling outside Iraq requirement.



"Luck and superstition wins all the time"!
User currently offlineTransSwede From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (11 years 5 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 1590 times:

True... But it still would not be a very smart thing to do. In the near future, any incoming passenger liner to Baghdad originating from Tel Aviv will be quite a magnet for SAM's, RPG's, and small arms fire.  Smile

I read a report from a aweek or two ago that coalition military aircraft landing in Baghdad still take sparadic small arms fire (in their general direction) on every approach. The way things are now (and seem to be heading), it will be quite a while before any airline in their right mind would fly to Baghdad.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
More Trouble For SAS And Dash 8-Q400 ... posted Thu Nov 8 2007 12:04:20 by Kaitak
About SAS And The 737-700 With Winglets posted Wed May 30 2007 12:55:25 by OyKIE
SAS And SAS Hotels posted Sun Oct 15 2006 21:07:56 by BA787
SAS And Miami posted Mon Jun 5 2006 00:20:49 by BOAC911
SAS And KLM In Near Collision posted Sun Jan 8 2006 12:36:38 by CPH757
SAS And Its 950.000 Euro Mistake posted Wed Aug 10 2005 13:29:54 by GlobeTrekker
Questions Re SV And AC At MAN 9th July posted Sat Jul 9 2005 19:52:02 by Trident2e
SAS And BHX? posted Thu Jun 9 2005 02:02:41 by Squirrel83
Near Collision Between SAS And Norwegian In Norway posted Sun Mar 13 2005 15:00:06 by Thom@s
Two BNA Route Questions Re BOS And US To EWR posted Wed Feb 23 2005 05:21:34 by Nycfuturepilot