Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Idea: WN Servicing Intra-Hawaii Routes  
User currently offlineAdh214 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 360 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2886 times:

I just finished reading an article on CNN that explained the price of intra Hawaii flight has increased dramatically and many residents of Hawaii are choosing to vacation on the main land instead of on other islands.

Link:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TRAVEL/07/07/hawaii.flyers.ap/index.html

I wonder if Southwest could make a go of it on intra Hawaii flights. I feel that this would match their business model.

1. Plenty of short flights
2. Over priced competition
3. Mostly a leisure market

They would have to make one modification to their business model. It is my understanding that they do not carry life rafts to save on weight. (Thus, flights from Texas to Florida for example fly east and then turn the corner to fly south.) As all of these flights would be over water they would have to carry the life rafts. However, I don't think this would be a major problem as the Hawaiian aircraft would likely be permanently based in Hawaii.

Also, they would do have connecting service from the main land. Thus, they would have to dead head planes back to the main land for maintenance. (Unless they wanted to start a flight from LA to Hawaii. Can the 737 make it that far with passengers?)

I know Southwest is not adding new cities but "connecting the dots" this year. I thought this might be a good item to discuss. Please don't act all annoyed. If you don't like the topic, the back button is the upper left corner of most browsers.

So what do you think? Would it work? Would Southwest consider it?

Andrew

23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUN_B732 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 4289 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2865 times:

OAK-KOA is served by Hawaiian or Aloha on a 737NG (with winglets?) but WN is getting winglets now. Each WN station would have to have 10 flights a day in this case...if that is possible in this case.
-UN



What now?
User currently offlineUN_B732 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 4289 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2862 times:

Is it OAK-KOA I know some Mainland to Hawaii flight is done, but I'm not sure if it is OAK-KOA??
-UN



What now?
User currently offlineI LOVE EWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 852 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2854 times:

This topic has come up from time to time, do a search. I think it won't work but you never know.

User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16877 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2834 times:

WN could buy into Aloha and develop a reciprocal FF program, see what happens.


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2822 times:

I think it would work, except that WN would have to build an MX infrastructure out on the islands, or operate only -700's out there and provide mainland service to rotate aircraft in and out.

All in all, it's probably something they feel has too many "moving parts" for not enough total return.

Steve


User currently offlineHa763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3661 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2802 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

AQ does fly OAK-KOA with a 737-700 without winglets. Anyways, history has shown that the market cannot support 3 major interisland carriers and this was when the interisland market was growing. The demand for interisland flights has been dropping with the increase of airlines flying directly to the neighbor islands. The interisland market has not been profitable for both AQ and HA for about the past 5-6 years.

If WN were to move in, at least one carrier will eventually exit the market.


User currently offlineAloha73G From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2362 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2805 times:

Aloha uses 737-700s with NO winglets to fly HNL/OGG/KOA/LIH to YVR/OAK/SNA/BUR.

The interisland market has shrunk considerably since its peak in the mid 1990s due to direct flights from LAX and SFO to OGG/KOA/LIH. Both Hawaiian and Aloha say it is unprofitable even with full loads.

One thing to consider is that Hawaii has extremely high costs of doing business, particularly with regard to taxes and labor costs. I am not sure if WN could make it profitable with such short flights (about 20 mins HNL-OGG).

Both Aloha and Hawaiian operate like WN on these flights (no seat assignments, quick beverage service) and in most respects are more efficient as far as services go.

WN would have to make a lot of changes to it business plan to make Hawaii work, and most likely would have to fly from LAX to HNL or OGG.

It would be interesting, but I think WN will stay out of this saturated, unprofitable market.



Aloha Airlines - The Spirit Moves Us. Gone but NEVER Forgotten. Aloha, A Hui Hou!
User currently offlineTT737FO From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 472 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2781 times:

Aloha and Hawaiian, for all their quirks, are bitched about constantly. However, the proposed merger "Haloha" has the governor running scared because some competitor (such as a healthy United) may move in.

Despite everyone's concerns about the air fares here, make no mistake about it: Aloha and Hawaiian have been here a long time and are the political sweethearts with the locals.

Aloha and Hawaiian have their own unique service....the locals (who make up a great deal of the traffic) love to bitch about it. But they will, in the end, be very loyal if a competitor moves in. WN moving in here would be a real tough row to hoe.


User currently offlineHA_DC9 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 653 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2656 times:

The aircraft type also has a lot to do with a carrier making money on the interisland routes in addition to what has been discussed above. As has been discussed before, any 737 version other than the 737-200 would be very expensive to operate on Hawaii interisland flights. Aloha learned that lesson when they tried using 737-400s. It is also why they will not use their 737-700s on interisland flights. This is why Aloha uses (and will continue to use) the 737-200: it has the right capacity and AQ can get them cheap. Any carrier who wants to fly interisland routes would need an aircraft that is specifically designed to fly routes like Hawaii interisland economically which is either an RJ, turboprops (which people in Hawaii dislike), or the 717-200. I highly doubt that WN will introduce another fleet type to fly within Hawaii.

User currently offlineCheshirecat From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2625 times:

Southwest COULD make the flights between LA to HNL, they have the equipment; but the cost is probably what SWA is looking at. Hawaii already has two local airlines that both handle that route (EG: Aloha and Hawaiian) That, plus 15-20 some other airlines that all fly into Hawaii... in other words, too much competition.

SWA's strong point is that it's able to lower the costs through volume. Airlines such as ATA already offer sub-$400 flights to and from the islands, something that SWA would have a hard time competing with. The best example I can think of is Aloha's flights to and from Oakland. From what I remember hearing on the local news, Aloha was losing money...LOTS of money due to increased operating costs and lower passenger volume. I'm pretty sure SWA is looking at the big wallet before they decide to fly over one of the biggest puddles on earth.

-J


User currently offlineSRD737NG From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 136 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2511 times:

Just a quick add on to what HA_DC9 had to say up above, and that is the airplanes being used/could be used interisland. The 737-200 IS the best for the job in this environment. The number osf cycles these planes get are huge. No airplane is stronger and can take more abuse than a 727 or in Aloha's case, the thunder guppy. Aloha would love to fly them forever, but unfortunatly they will most likely be phased out by 2007. A replacement aircraft is being researched. Some say RJ's. Nope, won't work - unless you want one RJ flying with the people and a 2nd RJ flying in formation with all the vacation bags and cargo. Those airplanes simply don't have the capacity for both. Turbo props - nope. As HA_DC9 said, and most people know, passengers don't like em. And as far as the 717 goes, i don't really think it's the perfect plane for the job either. From what i've been told, those engines aren't doing to well on these short hops all day out here. Not to mention, a brand new airplane +high lease payment + unprofitable interisland operation ='s BIGGER MONEY LOSER. I think that is being proven with a certain Chapter 11 filing. It's a tough market, but the 737-200 is the Boeing workhorse, its been proven. I'll be very interested to see what Aloha does in a few years!!

User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16285 posts, RR: 56
Reply 12, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2463 times:

The most logical replacement for the AQ 732 is the 735 or 733.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineHa763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3661 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2457 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would say that the 717 is just as good even slightly better aircraft. It really is a DC-9 with modern engines and systems. Even the DC-9 was an even match for the 737-200. One of HA's DC-9's retired with over 95,000 cycles. I used to have access to the reliablity reports for the whole HA fleet and the 717's had a dispatch rate in the very high 90's. On time performance was also in the high 90's. There were very little engine problems. I also don't recall any maintenance alerts for the engines.

User currently offlineBrons2 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3015 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2438 times:

After Greg mentioned it, I looked up the service alert history on the 717 and the BR-715 engines do have overheating problems when idled for long periods of time in high temperatures. Probably not good in Hawai'i.


Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
User currently offlineSRD737NG From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 136 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2435 times:

There is no question that the 717 is a nice airplane, but just wait and see if it's still up to the task 20 or 30 years from now. The DC-9 is still proving itself at NWA, i think HAL should have stuck with them interisland, especially since interisland flying has lost money for years before the 717 was ordered. I agree about the best replacement for the -200 to be the -300 or -500. Only problem there is, they are getting old too. Can you believe it? Time really fly's (no pun intended there).

User currently offlineHA_DC9 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 653 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2415 times:

I doubt that AQ would go for the -300. The -300 might be a bit too big. Also, if I can recall from a previous AQ 737 discussion on this board a very long time ago, one of the reasons that AQ dumped the -400 was that the CFM56 engines were not doing too well for the type of flying that AQ does. I don't remember the specifics, maybe an AQ pilot can elaborate.

"After Greg mentioned it, I looked up the service alert history on the 717 and the BR-715 engines do have overheating problems when idled for long periods of time in high temperatures. Probably not good in Hawai'i."

If i'm not mistaken, I thought HA shut down the 717 engines at each airport station upon arrival. I know for sure that they do shut off at HNL and LIH. If that is the case, then the overheating problem shouldn't affect HA too much.

To get back on the subject...I think it is possible for WN to do interisland flights, but given the reasons above, it is highly unlikely. WN is going to continue to do whatever they can to keep costs down not find ways to drive them up.


User currently offlineHAL From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2561 posts, RR: 53
Reply 17, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2394 times:

Here's my 2 cents worth:
WN would NEVER come into the interisland market, for all the reasons listed above. To recap:
1) HA and AQ have been there for 73 and 50+ years respectively. They have the loyalty of the locals, the infrastructure, and the experience. How much do you think it would cost WN to set up a complete route system with parts, maintenance, gates, personnel, etc.? This in a market the until recently was a huge money loser to both the local airlines.
2) Where would the passengers come from? HA and AQ not only bring their own across the Pacific, but code-share with all the big guys coming across too. WN does not code share. They only fly their own passengers. They'd have to start a complete trans-Pacific operation to do that, which would include ETOPS certification etc. That's another huge pot of money they'd have to pour into before making a single cent.
3) HA is now making a profit interisland. The 717 is working. The whole problem with extremely short flights is that for every takeoff, you are lifting the weight of the plane, fuel, passengers etc up and down. If you have a long flight, it doesn't matter much. But lifting 50,000+ lbs of metal up and down into the sky 15 or more times a day costs a LOT of money. That is why it is so hard to do with almost any plane. The 737 just doesn't cut it. It's way too big and heavy - just look at the latest profit statement from AQ. They're losing $ hand over fist. And the planes WN would bring in like the -300 or -500 would be even worse because they're more expensive to run because they're just bigger and heavier than AQ's -200's. HA can do it by having the lightest jet possible (for now) doing the job. And as for spending a lot of time idling the engines, I don't think you've watched any of these guys fly interisland. It's pushemback - startemup - taxi - you'reairborne. And on landing you've just barely rolled off the runway when the engines are being shut down as you coast up to the gate.
4) As said before, the locals complain bitterly about the two airlines right now. They cry like a baby if they can't just hop on a plane like getting into a cab to go visit Auntie Kamaka over on the next island. However both HA and AQ have to run a business, which means trying to make a profit. With the added stress of TSA inspections slowing things down, that is just about impossible. And all that comes from those who know best how to do it. WN knows this, and (as I said) would NEVER make an enterance into a market they know they can't control. WN hasn't made much in the way of mistakes up to this point, and I doubt they'd make one as big as this.

HAL



One smooth landing is skill. Two in a row is luck. Three in a row and someone is lying.
User currently offlineHa763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3661 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2357 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

HAL, I never realized HA was making a small profit interisland now. It must have been after I was let go.

I was glad that HA decided to get rid of the DC-9's. Part of the problem with the DC-9's were that they were becoming unreliable. The on time performance of the DC-9's were horrible. They had mechanicals everyday. It was a hugh surprise when the DC-9's went through one day without a mechanical. The MD-80 was not an option because like AQ's 737-400's, they were too big, more expensive to operate, and not suited for interisland flying. They had a couple of MD-80's in the early 80's and got rid of them.

The only overheating problem I recall the HA 717's having is a hydraulics overheat indication on longer taxis to the reef runway at HNL. Like HAL said, the engines do not idle for long on interisland flights. The only time they are idling and not moving are right after pushback, when holding short on a taxiway, or waiting for a gate. Most times they are only stopped idling for 5 minutes max. Plus it rarely gets over 90 degrees F even in the summer. I wouldn't exactly call that high temperatures.

Also, before anyone says that WN uses their 737-300/-500/-700's on short routes, remember that the interisland routes are much shorter than most WN routes. They probably will run into the same problem AQ did with their -400's if they used the -300 or -500 here.


User currently offlineTT737FO From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 472 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2353 times:

>>>"The only overheating problem I recall the HA 717's having is a hydraulics overheat indication on longer taxis to the reef runway at HNL.

Rarely will you see an inter-island use the reef--if ever it will be between 0800-1000 with the Japan traffic arrivals. 8L/26R is the norm. Very short taxis.


User currently offlineT prop From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 1029 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2339 times:

HAL, I never realized HA was making a small profit interisland now. It must have been after I was let go.

I'm interested in this also. Is HA making any lease payments on their aircraft or making payments to all creditors? If not, would this money saved be contributing to the profit?

T prop.





User currently offlineHAL From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2561 posts, RR: 53
Reply 21, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2202 times:

HAL, I never realized HA was making a small profit interisland now. It must have been after I was let go.

Dunkerley has put out some regular messages on the executive line, and according to him, we made a profit interisland Jan - Mar, and also May. Too soon to know about June. Mostly this is because of the increased fares and the much lower maintenance and operation cost of the 717.

Is HA making any lease payments on their aircraft or making payments to all creditors? If not, would this money saved be contributing to the profit?

According to the laws of bankruptcy, HA isn't paying Boeing Capital on the lease payments for those planes so they can preserve cash, but they still have to list the contracted payments as a debt on the balance sheets. So although the cash isn't going out the door, the payments still count on the balance sheet for profit/loss statements. Therefore, if we weren't in bankruptcy and had to pay out the cash, we'd still be making a profit on interisland. The idea of the bankruptcy is to preserve what little cash we had on hand to allow the airline to survive long enough to restructure the leases. And from what I understand, all other contracts and payments are being made on time.

HAL



One smooth landing is skill. Two in a row is luck. Three in a row and someone is lying.
User currently offlineI LOVE EWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 852 posts, RR: 8
Reply 22, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2148 times:

A little off topic but if you don't mind TT737FO could you send me an email at MAS757200@YAHOO.COM

I have a few questions about flying for JAL. Thank you.


User currently offlineLgbguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2142 times:

This topic does get boring, someone always has to bring it up.

Let me say this as a WN employee, this will not happen in the forseable future nor will service between the mainland and the Islands.

Don't get me wrong most of us at WN would LUV to see this service, but we all know it is not going to happen.

lgbguy


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Elite Classes On Intra-European Routes? posted Mon Dec 25 2006 03:00:38 by CRGsFuture
Intra-European Routes Exploiting Time-differences? posted Thu Oct 26 2006 07:59:58 by Kevin777
Boeing 787-3 For Delta Hawaii Routes? posted Sat Sep 9 2006 22:30:06 by 1337Delta764
New Hawaii Routes For DL posted Fri Dec 16 2005 18:20:48 by Skibum9
Who Best For Intra-CA Routes By-Passing LAX & SFO? posted Sun Sep 11 2005 22:11:09 by PanAm747
WN To Announce RSW Routes & Fares Today (7/14) posted Thu Jul 14 2005 14:48:47 by PVD757
What State Has The Most Intra-state Routes? posted Thu Jun 23 2005 01:02:34 by Ssides
ATA And Hawaii Routes- How Are They Doing? More? posted Sun Jun 5 2005 20:00:59 by F9HNLPLZ
Questions On ATA Hawaii Routes And 757 Etops posted Mon Jun 10 2002 23:43:14 by US A333 PIT
A Question About Intra-Hawaii Service posted Sat Feb 23 2002 02:29:33 by I LOVE EWR