Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
"Starlet Alliance" In The Making  
User currently offlineAirsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 31
Posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3839 times:

Hi everybody,

German media are reporting that the low cost carriers of Lufthansa, SAS and British Midland, namely germanwings, bmiBaby and snowflake will form a kind of alliance.

Apparently, these airlines realised passengers are starting to build connexions on their own, so they decided to take advantage of it and rather promote a germanwings/bmiBaby connexion than risking the passenger taking a Ryanair flight instead.

The plans for cooperation include:

- interline connexion tickets, including check-through baggage
- mutual access to reservation systems
- exchange of crews (and possibly aircraft)

Thought you might be interested.

Anything to add?

Daniel Smile

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineVoodoo From Niue, joined Mar 2001, 2176 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3755 times:

Hmmmm once you have inter-lining and check-thru and responsibility of missed connections...do you remain low-cost?

` Yeaah! Baade 152! Trabi of the Sky! '
User currently offlineDoorsToManual From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3743 times:

I thought the whole point of low-cost airlines was to take the cost elements out of the equation; the above could result in lots of refunds, and planes waiting on the ground, which most low-cost airlines say they can't afford.

Mmmm, sure, they're trying to convenience their passengers, but will this result in higher fares? Already people are simply moving to BA etc. if the fare difference narrows to a reasonable gap, so I hope these airlines mentioned are confident of their plans!!

User currently offlineTriStar500 From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 4706 posts, RR: 39
Reply 3, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3738 times:

Since low-cost, no-frills flying has become a very serious alternative (and threat) to the short- and medium haul networks of the established airlines, this could become very well a model for the future operations of the European network of Star Alliance. There have been - so far uncommented - rumors about LH considering to outsource some their domestic (and European?) flying to Germanwings for some time, so if they can manage to design a low-cost product, which can also be implemented for connecting traffic, they have a very competitive strategy for the continental flights in their hands.

IMO airlines like LH would probably prefer to outsource much of their domestic and short-haul international network, however complicated legal issues (most importantly the inevitable resistance of their unions) will prevent them from becoming competitive on short routes again.

This is only a very brief statement on a very interesting and complex issue. Big grin

Homer: Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
User currently offlineCPH-R From Denmark, joined May 2001, 6537 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3604 times:

A thing to notice about the name, is that it's been made from "Star Let" which, for someoen who understands Danish, means "Star Light". So that's one word with 2 meanings  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

User currently offlineTristar4ever From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 84 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3536 times:

This seems like a very good idea, each airlines web site could have the combined route map of the three, this would allow people to create their own connections, much like they do anyway with ryanair and easyjets larger networks.

this means it would essentialy be the passengers themselves creating a series of individual flights across the three networks, iliminating the cost of `inter lining` the flights, keeping the fares low, while giving people access to many more destinations and keeping them away from the competition.

roll on starlet alliance!


User currently offlineZSSNC From Germany, joined Feb 2003, 428 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3486 times:

It sound like a great idea. Especially since through-checking of luggage isn't possible on FR flights that would bring a possible LCC alliance a huge advantage over FR.

Talking of LCCs. Is through-checking of luggage possible on WN?


Airbus A340-600 - the longest temptation in the sky
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 20
Reply 7, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3473 times:

This might take away some of the simplification that true LCCs contain but then bmibaby is about as low-cost as BWIA is high yielding.
If you take into account the new EU proposals for compensating passengers for delayed flights etc this could become quite pricy for the airlines involved.

User currently offlineWMUPilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 1473 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3344 times:

Now we just need the US LCC's to take some advantage of this. More and more I see people flying to MDW on C8 and connecting to FL or F9 and on occassion WN...but WN will more than likely never ally themselves with another airline.

JetBlue - Bringing humanity back to air travel
User currently offlineJohnnybgoode From Germany, joined Jan 2001, 2187 posts, RR: 6
Reply 9, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3190 times:

i wonder why they haven´t come up with this from the beginning? i mean, first their was bmibaby, then germanwings and snowflake just following months behind.
ok, LH wasn´t fond of creating a low-cost airline and so they waited before coming up with 4U, but aligning those no frills-airlines now will generate some major costs...

needless to say that through-checking one´s baggage from first to final destination will make travel easier for the customers of those three LCCs, but i highly doubt those airlines will benefit from that from marketing perspective. i believe that most people traveling on LCCs do not expect and in most cases are not familiar with such a service.


If only pure sweetness was offered, why's this bitter taste left in my mouth.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A.net User Quoted In "Today In The Sky" posted Fri Aug 19 2005 18:21:48 by FlyerBoyEK
Discrepancy In Movie "Island In The Sky"? posted Thu Aug 4 2005 19:33:37 by Olympus69
"Richest" Airline In The World? posted Mon Apr 25 2005 13:54:26 by Erela
Qantas Proposal For B777 Is Still "Up In The Air" posted Thu Aug 12 2004 19:13:58 by Kalakaua
"Survival In The Sky" TV Program posted Mon Jul 26 2004 06:30:35 by N766UA
"Terror In The Skies" Article posted Tue Jul 20 2004 19:10:09 by Av8trxx
"Future Wings" - Aviation In The 21st Century posted Sun May 23 2004 09:10:46 by Womack17
Remember "Diamonds In The Sky"? posted Fri Apr 23 2004 20:12:07 by ORDagent
"Airline" Premieres In The US January 5th posted Mon Jan 5 2004 02:30:54 by Mjzair
Are "free Flights" Offered In The US? posted Mon Jul 7 2003 08:31:28 by DoorsToManual