Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SWA1925: AMA-LIT? Why?  
User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19259 posts, RR: 52
Posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1648 times:

I was just on Flytecomm.com and looking at LIT's arrivals. I was surprised to see the following flight because there is no SWA-operated scheduled service between these two cities.

Airline: Southwest
Flight Number: 1925
Departure City (Airport): Amarillo, TX (AMA)
Departure Time 07/12/2003: 06:03 PM
Arrival Time 07/12/2003: 07:15 PM
Remaining Flight Time: 00:17
Aircraft Type: Boeing 737-300
Current Altitude: 33,000 feet
Current Groundspeed: 561 mph
Flight Status: In Flight

Does anyone know the reason behind this flight?

[Edited 2003-07-13 02:11:05]


"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLoneStarMike From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 3867 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1600 times:

I think WN 1925 operates OAK-LAS-LIT-BWI. Looks like it made an unscheduled stop in AMA for whatever reason.

LoneStarMike

User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19259 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1581 times:

Yeah, 1925 routes OAK-LAS-LIT-BWI. I was just curious about the unscheduled AMA stop.


"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineLgbguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1546 times:

FUEL STOP DUE TO THE HIGH PAX LOADS AND HIGH TEMPS WITH LOW ATOGS IN LAS...THE LAST FEW DAYS EVERY LONG HAUL OUT OF LAS,MDW AND PHX HAVE BEEN MAKING FUEL STOPS DUE TO HIGH LOADS AND VERY HIGH TEMPS AND LOW ATOGS..OUT OF EACH CITY..

User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19259 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks ago) and read 1462 times:

Cheers Lgbguy! So it's very high loads and very hot weather?


"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineMEA-707 From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4358 posts, RR: 35
Reply 5, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1438 times:

Isn't an extra landing (fees, extra fuel to get up and down, late flights, missed connections) very expensive? I guess for a full 737 added costs for the airline will be like $5000. Can't the crew make the estimate with the pax, cargoloads and weatherforcast how much fuel they will burn, and then carry a little extra fuel?


nobody has ever died from hard work, but why take the risk?
User currently offlineUN_B732 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 4289 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1416 times:

It's funny.............cuase is LIT (where is lit) really that far away from LAS, and you can't burn all of your fuel between LAS and AMA.
-UN



What now?
User currently offlineSs278 From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 65 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1369 times:

Its not a question of figuring out how much fuel you will burn. It is a question of how much revenue will you leave behind to fly nonstop, versus the cost of the fuel stop.

On hot days aircraft can be weight restricted. Hot air is thinner than cold air, hence it will produce less lift, thus an airplane cannot be as heavy on takeoff as on a colder day, using the same runways. You have a choice. Do I carry fuel or people and freight?

Leaving pax and freight behind = lost revenue. Will I be better off taking all the people and freight, hence maximizing revenue and making a fuel stop enroute, or, is it better to leave revenue behind and fly nonstop? It is hardly EVER better to leave revenue behind.

In this case, they could fly LAS-AMA nonstop with the fuel available and a full load, but not LAS-LIT, and obviously the fuel stop made economic sense.


User currently offlineBarney captain From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 998 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1349 times:

LAS was 115f yesterday. With the high terrain off the departure end of 25L, we are VERY weight limited due to high terrain to the west. We can actually carry more weight departing off of 7L (same piece of pavement) with up to a 10 kt tailwind. Fuel stops on a day like this are not uncommon, and in reality, not that big of a deal. We typically use places like MAF (Midland) and AMA because we can get in and get out with minimal time. The last time we had to make a fuel stop, we ended up only being @ 15 minutes late, total ground time was less than 10 minutes.


...from the Banana Republic....
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Does AMA Have Such A Huge RWY? posted Wed Apr 13 2005 06:23:54 by Skywatch
DL LIT-ATL Canceled Today, Anyone Know Why? posted Wed Oct 16 2002 08:19:02 by 727_Gal
Why Was This CO Flight Cancelled Today? posted Thu Mar 8 2007 22:18:39 by Nycfuturepilot
Why Doesn't Co.com Show Me All Of The Options? posted Thu Mar 8 2007 14:16:30 by Lincoln
Why Are Iraqi Destinations Not Listed In CRS? posted Wed Mar 7 2007 20:59:46 by Airevents
Why No Fare Codes Shown On AA.com Reservations? posted Wed Mar 7 2007 06:21:09 by TransWorldSTL
Why Are'nt More Winglets Added To Older Jets? posted Wed Mar 7 2007 00:44:56 by JAM747
Why Are Discount Airlines So Profitable? posted Tue Mar 6 2007 04:12:45 by J3flyboy
Why / What Is Codeshare? posted Mon Mar 5 2007 20:31:08 by EGCC777LR
Why No Us Airlines With 777-300 posted Sun Mar 4 2007 09:39:27 by Cactusmurf