Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pieces Of 9/11 Planes  
User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6204 posts, RR: 12
Posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4600 times:

I was surprised to see that pieces of the landing gear of the 9/11 planes were actually recovered. Were these the largest pieces recovered?




Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinePROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5644 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4566 times:

I was surprised to see that pieces of the landing gear of the 9/11 planes were actually recovered. Were these the largest pieces recovered?

As far as I know. In fact, I'm not sure if any identifiable aircraft parts were found within the WTC wreckage.



"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4551 times:

I remember seeing a piece on C-SPAN early last year about the sorting facility at Fresh Kills for WTC debris, and there were pieces of a/c found, and you could definitely see which pieces came off of the United 767.

User currently offlineAerlingusa330 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 358 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4329 times:

I remember vividly the sight of one of the engines of one of the planes on a street corner on tv. It was in pretty much in tact, just the nacelles were ripped off. I was astounded to see an engine withstood the blast.


Shamrock 136 heavy cleared for takeoff runway niner.
User currently offlineAdam T. From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 957 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4255 times:

I recall seeing in a magazine ,around the 9/11 anniversary, there were some picutres of a few pieces of jet. One was a piece of fuselage, not that big, 2-3 feet long at most, and about a foot and a half tall. And you could cleary see that it was from one of the AA jets. I forgot which one though...sorry  Sad
Adam


User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4231 times:

There were some recognizeable pieces found. A section of the fuselage, with holes for the windows, were recovered. It was from American Airlines Flight # 11.

One of the United Airlines 767 engines was also found on the street near the WTC. It crashed out the windows on the other side of the south tower, from where it was hit.

I do not think any identifiable pieces of the UA 757 or the AA 757 jets that were hijacked and crashed were recovered.

ContinentalEWR


User currently offlineStevenUhl777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4110 times:

AerLingusa330/ContinentalEWR: That's amazing...I didn't know that one of the engines from UA175 was found on a street near the WTC! I saw the documentary also, and they had set aside some pieces from the jets, and the piece of fuselage from UA175 which had the faint UA colors on it.

Can't speak about AA77, but I think some pieces were taken from UA93 in western PA, for analysis. That plane hit so hard it went underground several feet and shattered, but I seem to recall hearing some of the flight deck components were recovered.

It would have been amazing, and lucky, if any of the FDR's had been found and functional.

The forensics teams were able to, by process of elimination, identify the remains of the Muslim cowards who hijacked the jets. No clue what happened to those, but who really cares?


User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2104 posts, RR: 5
Reply 7, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4068 times:

A piece of landing gear almost fatally wounded a pedestrian on the sidewalk below. Her ordeal was profiled in the news.

An airplane is mostly air, fuel, and aluminum. Those things disappear in a collision of that magnitude. But the landing gear assemblies and the engines are very dense, solid and heavy. They survive just about any destruction because their inertia carries them through solid concrete walls. It's almost impossible to make a jet engine or wheel boggies disappear in a collision.



An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
User currently offlineDL_Mech From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 1968 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4044 times:

Pieces of the planes were on display at the 9/11 exhibit in the Smithsonian a few months ago. A piece of passenger window frame and some wing skin were clearly identifiable.

One of the 9/11 documentaries showed the trailer containing aircraft parts at the Fresh Kills site. I actually recognized some of the plumbing on the GE CF6-80A2 engine from AA #11.



This plane is built to withstand anything... except a bad pilot.
User currently offlineAC_B777 From Canada, joined Aug 2000, 809 posts, RR: 13
Reply 9, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4016 times:

Is there a website that would have more pictures of the "remains" of the a/c involved on 9/11?
I have heard as well that there were parts of the planes found, but I have'nt seen too many pictures.
Thanks!

AC_B777



In life, some days you are the bug..... some days you are the windshield!
User currently offlineLH423 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 6501 posts, RR: 54
Reply 10, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3944 times:

I remember a picture of a dumpster (yes, a regular dumpster) at the WTC site that was spraypainted "Aircraft Parts". So, I guess they must have put things from the site that were recognizably from the planes.

LH423



« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
User currently offlineFanofjets From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 1995 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3889 times:

Perhaps this is off topic, but I am compelled to comment on the following:

The forensics teams were able to, by process of elimination, identify the remains of the Muslim cowards who hijacked the jets. No clue what happened to those, but who really cares?

While we would all agree that the individuals who committed these acts were heinous cowards, could we please leave their religion out of it? Do we speak of "white, Christian terrorists" when discussing bombings of family-planning clinics? I don't thinks so.



The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth. -Antoine de Saint-Exupery
User currently offlineDsuairptman From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 903 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3870 times:

A regretable day for aviation and history both. I know that the nose cone of the second plane blew right out the other side and on out away, but I have not heard of other debris until now.

Considering victims and property in the buliding where totally atomized (My apologies if this too strong a word) it brings me to ask how anything on or in the aircraft could have survived if they went first on impact, can someone who knows something about pyshics possibly explain?



GEAUX SAINTS!
User currently offlineDL_Mech From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 1968 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3835 times:

Here is a link to some of the Smithsonians' collection of 9/11 aircraft parts.

http://americanhistory.si.edu/september11/collection/record.asp?ID=45



This plane is built to withstand anything... except a bad pilot.
User currently offlineStevenUhl777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3755 times:

Attn: fanofjets:

DL_Mech posted a link to the Smithsonian's collection of parts. At the top of their page, they ALSO make reference to 19 ISLAMIC extremists...So the Smithsonian Institute also made reference to the coward's religion! I would recommend you contact them and ask the museum to make their comment more "politically correct" so we're more aware and diverse and sensitive and whatever else.

The white people who bomb family planning clinics ARE absolutely white, christian terrorists...it's just that the liberal news media can't get away with saying that here, because of the majority of Christians in this country would go berserk.



User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6204 posts, RR: 12
Reply 15, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3677 times:

Thanks DL_Mech ; an errie collection indeed.


Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineMas a330 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3568 times:

Yeah. that seat belt just freaked me out.

User currently offlineLa Carlota From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 358 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3491 times:

What about that letter that apparently was in the USPS shipment on the AA 757 that hit the North Tower and someone found close to the WTC area?


Tango Tango Fox
User currently offlineUN_B732 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 4289 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3306 times:

But, wasn't that AA 587 where a Engine was right on the street in Queens?
-UN



What now?
User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2104 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3225 times:

No way a radom cone of the AA 767 survived. It is just a piece of aluminum. It would have been the first piece reduced to fragments upon impact with the solid steel exterior support beams. If you look at the footage you can see all those shiny shredded pieces of aluminum fluttering in the air. As far as the physics involved, I explain again. The heavier objects are very dense and solid. Their inertia, produce by their weight and their speed, is enough to blow a hole through any office building, which is mostly air and glass. Even the concrete walls of the core can't stop a 10,000 lb ball of steel traveling at 450 mph. If you take a one once bullet and throw it at a blanket it won't go through. But if you accelerate it to several hundred miles per hour, it will go through no problem. Accelerate it even faster and it would go through thin steel. Make it go even faster, in a vacuum to eliminate friction, and it will produce a crater in armor. The piece of foam that came off the external tank of the shuttle, made a nasty hole in the leading edge of the left wing. Although it was only foam, it did have mass, and at 500 mph, that combination was enough to make a hole.


An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
User currently offlineGmasterd From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3148 times:

The section of fuselage that ContinentalEWR mentioned is currently on display at the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum (the aircraft carrier museum) in NYC. I saw it the other day along with the rest of their tribute to 9/11. It's very powerful to see those remains.


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16885 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3077 times:

The right click option is disabled on this page, but there are plenty of pictures of pieces of the aircraft engines surrounded by FBI agents.

http://www.nyartlab.com/bombing/index1.html



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineFanofjets From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 1995 posts, RR: 3
Reply 22, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2996 times:

Thank you for the heads-up, StevenUhl777, and for the link, DL_Mech. I have sent the Smithsonian the following e-mail:
Dear Sir or Madam,

While I found your Web pages on the September 11 collection to be informative and invaluable,

http://americanhistory.si.edu/september11/collection/record.asp?ID=45

I would like to request an amendment to the above-mentioned page, in regard to the "19 Islamic extremists" mentioned in the "Context" box. I strongly suggest the deletion of the word "Islamic" - do we really need to mention the religion of the hijackers? Though they may purport to have acted in the name of Islam and Allah, surely the majority of Muslims would sharply disagree. After all, do we refer to the extremists who bomb family-planning clinics as "White, Christian extremists"? I strongly feel that a correction is due; it mars an otherwise fine Web page.

Thank you for your consideration.


I am very disappointed that a fine and reputable organization such as the Smithsonian would let something like this slip. It's just plain (no pun intended) wrong. I urge other A.net fans who feel likewise to write as well.



The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth. -Antoine de Saint-Exupery
User currently offlineDan2002 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 2055 posts, RR: 5
Reply 23, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2872 times:

Looking at some of those pics of the WTC and the planes almost made me cry!


A guy asks 'What's Punk?'. I kick over a trash can and its punk. He knocks over a trash can and its trendy.
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16885 posts, RR: 51
Reply 24, posted (11 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2694 times:

They were "Islamic Extremists", that's a correct term. They use extreme interpretations of Islam to justify their crimes against humanity, it's a correct term.

There are Christian Extremists, Jewish Extremists etc.

They fight because of their "extreme" religious teaches tell them, so they are Chritian/Islamic/Jewish Extremists.

David Koresh and the Branch dividians were Christian extremists, and were labled as such correctly.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
25 Erj-145mech : "No way a radom cone of the AA 767 survived. It is just a piece of aluminum" Actually, the radome is constructed of composite material. "Radar waves"
26 Western737 : To the point, as right now, are all pieces still hold under FBI's hands?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Skyway News As Of 11/12/06 posted Wed Nov 15 2006 18:22:29 by SkyexRamper
Anybody Know The Crews Of 9/11? posted Fri Jul 28 2006 06:46:57 by Usair320
Receipt Of New Planes - WN Specifically posted Fri May 19 2006 20:04:51 by SkyHarborsHome
Boeing Flys Over On Evening Of 9-11-2001 posted Thu May 4 2006 05:02:26 by L1329II
Cost Of Stored Planes posted Sat Mar 18 2006 15:04:22 by Azza40
FAA Orders Inspection Of Airbus Planes posted Thu Nov 24 2005 10:41:10 by Werdywerd
Can Anyone Identify This Piece Of 9/11 Wreckage? posted Sun Oct 9 2005 04:15:41 by Hmmmm...
High Number Of NWA Planes Out Of Service-WCCO posted Sun Aug 14 2005 18:20:15 by KarlB737
Knowing The Regs Of KLM Planes Before U Fly! posted Sun Apr 17 2005 16:34:52 by CV990
What Is The Fate Of These Planes? posted Wed Mar 2 2005 05:12:26 by COAMiG29