Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Low-cost Airlines Not Charging Low Fares  
User currently offlineDoorsToManual From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3037 times:

Hi

This is an observation which I have made recently, and your thoughts are welcome too. Because I live in Europe, it concernes European LCCs.

I have recently been stunned at the relative rarity/difficulty of finding a reasonable fare on some LCCs (I don't mean something stupid like 35 euro cents or British pence etc.) I mean something like, let's say, under 70 pounds.

With easyjet, it seems quite difficult really, unless you book WAY in advance (months), and even then, I have never been able to get a good fare to the only easyjet destination that really interests me: ATHENS.

The worst offenders are Iceland Express (nothing below 108 pounds, ever, although I guess it's cheaper than the Icelandair rip-off) and Flying Finn (nothing below 98 euros each way, making them more expensive than BA or AY!!)

Inclusive with Norwegian, where fares are still never below 90 pounds. Maybe that's cheaper than BA or SK, but not by much - and if you don't mind flying to Torp, you can go for much less...

Germanwings prices ex-CGN used to be good, and fares from STN are generally also good if booked 4 weeks in advance or more, but mostly their prices to other Euro locations seem to have shot through the roof - are they really cheaper than LH to these places??

Am I being unfair here, what do people think?

I haven't mentioned some other operators, but I am finding that the above are not as cheap as they make out.

Specially on the STN-HEL route, how can a so-called "low-cost" airline charge MORE than BA or Finnair?! Buzz used to fly to Finland for much less - for only 60 pounds total on some occasions!

Over to you!

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTeahan From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 5293 posts, RR: 61
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3000 times:

Well according a January 2003 Investors Presentation on Ryanair's website, here are some average fares per way (excluding taxes I presume).

Ryanair €49
easyJet €83
Air Berlin €102
Deutsche BA €114
Germanwings €131

Jeremiah



Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2991 times:

LCCs like many standard airlines use revenue-management programs, which adjust seat prices based on demand. The really cheap seats go quickest, and are usually a small percentage of the seats on that flight. So to really get those dirt cheap fares, you have to book as far in advance as they will let you. Here in America, the LCCs don't do the 'bait and switch' like many Euro LCCs do, the closer to the departure date you book, the price will vary. But what is strange is that sometimes it's cheaper to book 2 weeks in advance than 3 weeks in advance. Say LCC #1 is charging $50 each way on it's ATL-MCO route (based on a 21 day advanced purchase); you wait until ten days prior to your flight to book, and that fare may rise up to $75 each way; now let's say you find out that you got to be in Orlando for a meeting in three days, that fare may rise up to $100 each way; or say you got to get to Orlando today no matter what, the walk-up fare might be $200 each way. This is an simplified way of how typical fare prices are here in the States.

User currently offlineDoorsToManual From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2961 times:

Hi

Thanks for the replies so far, a pleasure to read.

Srbmod, this is what I have found: easyjet last-minute fares are uniformly extremely high (I fully expect that).

This is the case with most airlines BUT on more than 1 occasion I have found some bargain last-minute fares with Germanwings and Ryanair, but usually only on midweek flights in low season.

Another observation; with flights to ATH on easyjet, the outward fare can be very reasonable i.e. 26 pounds before tax, but the RETURN leg fare is 92 pounds before tax!!! You can imagine how annoying that is but WHY?? Why not 26 pounds each way??


User currently offlineChepos From Puerto Rico, joined Dec 2000, 6208 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2964 times:

The same thing happens here in The Americas.
I have to travel to Orlando in a month and a half and the only low fare airline that has good fares is ATA- $232.00 roundtrip . AA is next with $258.00.
Spirit and SONG both have fares in the $290.00 (they are both supposed to be low fare airlines ) So I guess I'ss have to fly on either ATA or AA.
Chepos



Fly the Flag!!!!
User currently offlineRichardw From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 3746 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2912 times:

Low cost is a relative term and should not be used.

They are no frills airlines, because you have to pay for any drinks and snacks.

They should also be clear about their pricing, in my opinion their fares go up and down according to demand. Sometimes the airline puts a flight on sale with seats at higher prices, demand is not very good and the price falls!


User currently offlineAngelAirways From United Kingdom, joined Nov 1999, 502 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2813 times:

I have discovoered from experience that Paris CDG or Edinburgh EDI are always cheaper with BA from LHR (even when you add taxes) than with easyJet from Luton or Gatwick, unless you book the easyJet flight 3 months in advance  Smile

That's why BA were voted best low cost airline in a survey with 24,000 respondents.. to their surprise.


User currently offlineWMUPilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 1473 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2785 times:

TZ would be a good choice...you may get to ride on the new 753's to MCO from MDW. I've seen TZ's prices rise a bit here in the past few weeks. I think that we are testing the waters to see how high we can get the prices before people start to complain about them. Last week I saw a family of 6 going round trip to LAS at $175.00 a person, and they bought the tickets 5 days in advance. Walk-up fare to LAS on that day was pretty impressive too $220 round trip.


JetBlue - Bringing humanity back to air travel
User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6770 posts, RR: 75
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2718 times:

Why not compare the prices for full flexible fare for say tomorrow peak hour...
Will the LCCs be more expensive? I doubt it...

Mandala499



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 16
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2701 times:

TZ would be a good choice...you may get to ride on the new 753's to MCO from MDW. I've seen TZ's prices rise a bit here in the past few weeks. I think that we are testing the waters to see how high we can get the prices before people start to complain about them. Last week I saw a family of 6 going round trip to LAS at $175.00 a person, and they bought the tickets 5 days in advance. Walk-up fare to LAS on that day was pretty impressive too $220 round trip.

WMUPilot, you illustrate the true "low fare" concept there. Too many folks will say that the low fare carrier cost more than the "real" airline - on a 21 day, travel on a Tuesday, stay a Saturday, and come home on a Wednesday fare. The real test of a "low fare" carrier is the walk up fare. IMHO, reasonable walk up fares stimulate business in that someone needing to travel at the last minute will find that the full fare won't break the bank. Mainline carriers have yet to discover this, however.


User currently offlineDoorsToManual From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2699 times:

Mandala, with respect, that's not the point.

My point above was that it was becoming increasingly difficult (with some LCCs) to find reasonably low fares, even in advance. Some LCCs have a fixed price structure, so that no matter how far in advance you book, the price will remain the same (usually high...)

Other airlines used to offer some great fares to start with, then prices eventually crept up (Germanwings).

I love the LCCs, but with some, it seems you have to wait until they have a special offer (through newspapers and such), before you can easily avail of good value fares, significantly lower than those of full-service airlines.

ciao


User currently offlineDocpepz From Singapore, joined May 2001, 1969 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2525 times:

I've been in Paris for the past 2 months and will be here till the end of Sept. Full service carriers like BMI and BA have always been cheaper than Ryanair and Easyjet.

With taxes, CDG-LHR return costs €112 on BA (€69 without)

On BMI it costs about the same too.

This is presuming I book it 3 weeks in advance.

Ryanair and Easyjet all gave me fares that were ranging from €80 to 100 without taxes. Plus, Ryanair takes off from some strange airport trillions of miles from Paris and lands in Luton or something.

Heathrow - Chiswick on the tube costs £2.
Stansted/Luton - Chiswick would cost at least £15, or €23. That would erase any price gains I might have gotten from choosing Easyjet.

In short, I have learnt that low cost airlines do not give you the best fares unless you book about 2 milleniums in advance.

So over the past 2 months, i have done CDG-LHR vv on BMI once and BA twice.

In short, if you do not land in Heathrow when flying from Paris, the extra cost and time spent makes the Eurostar a more viable option.

Sometimes a full service carrier flight is cheaper than the EUrostar. Friday night departure on Eurostar costs €75 whereas a one way ticket on BMI WITH taxes costs €53.

Thanks to low cost carriers, we are able to enjoy low fares on full service carriers.


User currently offlineTriStar500 From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 4693 posts, RR: 43
Reply 12, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2506 times:

From my experience of several dozen flight bookings this year (I am doing this task in my company as well as for my private travels), I have discovered a certain price and booking pattern.

Up until about one or two months before departure, the low-cost airline flights are usually cheaper than "regular" airlines on the same route. Until about four weeks before departure, the cheaper fare classes have been booked out. At this point, it becomes more sensible to look for cheaper fares at the regular airlines, because their chepaest fare classes haven't still been booked. This rule changes again about one week before departure, when fare prices on regular airlines increase up to walkup fare level on the day of departure. At this point, low-cost airlines usually have the edge again.

Works pretty well on a those routes I am regularily booking. E.g. on DUS/CGN-VIE it is cheaper to book OS/LH about one to four weeks before departure than 4U.
4U round trip fares at that point usually range between 150 and 250 Euro/rt, while OS/LH are usually still at their entry level of either 149 or 184 Euro/rt.
If it is less than one week, 4U usually stands at between 210-250 Euro/rt, while OS/LH are at 450 Euro or more.




Homer: Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6202 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2487 times:

"Low cost" means low cost for them, not you  Big grin


Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineAsgeirs From Iceland, joined May 2001, 516 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2381 times:

> The worst offenders are Iceland Express (nothing below 108 pounds, ever, > although I guess it's cheaper than the Icelandair rip-off)

Do you realize that Iceland only has about 290.000 inhabitants and Iceland Express only operates one aircraft (well it's actually Astraeus that operates the jet, but...)? By Icelandic standards, their lowest fare (about £110 for a KEF-STN-KEF roundtrip) is very cheap. It costs nearly as much to fly a 35 minute domestic flight on a Dornier 228.

No offense  Smile/happy/getting dizzy , but I think you are being a bit harsh in stating that Iceland Express is the worst offender.






Reykjavik Aviation Photography - Just bring the aircraft to us and we'll photograph them! :-)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Low Cost Airlines, Not So Low Cost posted Sat Feb 5 2005 08:17:32 by AirWillie6475
KLM Cuts Fares To Compete With Low-Cost Airlines posted Mon Jul 8 2002 19:46:43 by Singapore_Air
Low-cost Airlines At GLA...do They Use Airbridges? posted Wed Nov 15 2006 15:15:15 by 8herveg
Low Cost Airlines posted Tue Oct 10 2006 21:14:29 by Rom1
How To Save Low Cost Airlines - Funny posted Fri Aug 25 2006 04:31:09 by Scoliodon
Low-cost Airlines Ignoring ATC? posted Thu Aug 24 2006 10:44:35 by Infodesk
Futures For Low-Cost Airlines.... posted Tue Jun 13 2006 22:27:57 by Dolcevita747
Low-Cost Airlines: Sources For Generating Revenue posted Mon Dec 12 2005 17:34:03 by GVA777
Low Cost Airlines In NE Asia, Flying International posted Mon Oct 10 2005 10:10:08 by Manni
Developer Wants Opa-Locka For Low Cost Airlines posted Fri Aug 26 2005 00:16:14 by KarlB737