Flairport From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1920 times:
rate these routes based on what you think the chances of them happening on B6 are... 0=never 10=definently.... if there is a chance, in your opinion,then put your guess on when they will do this route
WMUPilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 1473 posts, RR: 12 Reply 1, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1890 times:
Luv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 11957 posts, RR: 51 Reply 2, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1817 times:
rate these routes based on what you think the chances of them happening on B6 are... 0=never 10=definently.... if there is a chance, in your opinion,then put your guess on when they will do this route
Timberwolf24 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 562 posts, RR: 1 Reply 3, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1811 times:
PROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5440 posts, RR: 5 Reply 4, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1787 times:
I'll respond to the ones that I consider to be zeros (no chance):
JFK-MIA
B6 won't want to initiate a head-to-head battle with AA. It prefers to take the lead and make AA play catch-up, e.g. JFK-LGB.
Tekelberry From United States of America, joined May 2003, 1459 posts, RR: 5 Reply 7, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1631 times:
PROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5440 posts, RR: 5 Reply 8, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1631 times:
Can you please comfirmed with city code is: HFD? Please leave it with their post for me.
The original poster probably meant BDL.
"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
Flairport From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 9, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1623 times:
I'm sorry... i didn't know Hartford's code... HFD-Hartford... i completely forgot that it was DL / KBDL), USA - Connecticut">BDL for bradley field or whatever.
SEA-HNL is not a choice, that was my bad, smae with SEA-OGG
ScottysAir, as much as i agree with you for the routings, i don't think that Neelman is thinking like us!
HNL-OGG is 100 miles, so ETOPS is not an issue, but i can see why it would look odd.
AS FAR AS MY OPINION:
JFK-Midway= 10... very soon
JFK-ORD = 10... unless they go to midway
JFK-DET = 3... good route, but Flint might work as well
JFK-MSP =10... good support for a city without it
ADDED: MSP-LGB = 8... with space, a good route
JFK-MIA =5... Miami just fits B6 in my opinion
FLL-ATL =10... i think it is a very profitable route. Although DL removed flghts, they are all 767-300 or -400's
ATL-JFK=10 SONG
SJU-FLL=10... good route?
MSY-LGB= 10... good route!
LGB-HNL=3 (7 for codeshare) it will happen
LGB-OGG=3 see above
OAK-OGG see above
OAK-HNL see above
SEA-ANC 7... it will happen. with the new "iceberg Blue"
HNL-OGG 2 (7 with codeshare) i can see a big codeshare
ANC-FAI- 7, see SEA-ANC
SEA-LGB 8... if room opens up
LGB-TPA 6... only to take on SONG
JFK-IAD 10... jetBlue Shuttle
JFK-BOS see above
FLL-DL / KBDL), USA - Connecticut">BDL 6 Song stopper
ADDITION: PBI-DL / KBDL), USA - Connecticut">BDL 6 SONG stopper
FLL-MCO in the new EMB 10 jetBlue Express
FLL-TPA see above
JFK-Nassau 8... same type of route as JFK-SJU
JFK-YUL 10 Neelman is probably thinking: OH CANADA!!!!!
JFK-YYZ 10
Jeff G From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 431 posts, RR: 1 Reply 10, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1564 times:
Midway2airtran From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 864 posts, RR: 2 Reply 12, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 1445 times:
Some random selections...
LGB-RDU=7 Lots of talk about this one believe it or not!
JFK-CLT=6
LGB-ORD=8
JFK-ORD=7
JFK-MDW=4
LGB-MDW=3 MDW has plenty of lowfare competition, WN too, go for ORD!
JFK-DFW=7
JFK-STL=6
JFK-FNT=6
The EMB 190's aren't coming till 2005, so I won't bother guessing on those!!
MAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 31157 posts, RR: 76 Reply 13, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 1305 times:
I would not rule out JFK-MIA for a few reasons. First off, jetBlue's second biggest frequent flier base is in the Miami area. With eleven year-round dailies to JFK (more in the winter), two dailies to Dulles, and a second daily to Long Beach starting 8 September (only four months after the inagural), they are huge here. FLL-OAK is also in the pipeline, and rumours are it will be ready for Christmas. Three daily MIA-JFK flights would compliment the FLL service very nicely, and would fill easily. MIA is spending $600,000 this year and for two more years to lure new international and low-fare carriers, including jetBlue. They are offering zero incentives though, just clever marketing, and they are targeting jetBlue. We'll see what happens. Reasons not to expect jetBlue at MIA? Besides the obvious fact that MIA is a congested airport that does not fit the jetBlue personna, the biggest reason is clearly American Airlines. Though they have many more markets to look at before ever coming to MIA.
FLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4935 posts, RR: 53 Reply 15, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1246 times:
Why is everybody so confident that YUL-JFK or YYZ-JFK would be a "for sure" for B6?
B6 could easily tap the HUGE florida markets out of Montreal and Toronto to FLL. With B6's low-fares and brilliant service, they could blow others on the route (SG/AC/TS etc.)
Dsuairptman From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 811 posts, RR: 0 Reply 16, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1219 times:
I could see B6 operating a MSY-LGB at least a few days a week.
The would be going agiansit UAL and WN to the LA area, so I'm not so sure they would make it a daily frequency.
MAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 31157 posts, RR: 76 Reply 17, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1218 times:
I agree with FLYYUL, any Toronto and/or Montreal service would be to Ft. Lauderdale, not JFK. I could also see potential for a YYZ-LGB redeye service. Both Toronto and Montreal are well served from New York City. The same way they bypassed JFK with Dulles and Atlanta service, I see the same with any service they propose to Montreal and/or Toronto.
Cmckeithen From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 617 posts, RR: 1 Reply 18, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1205 times:
Luv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 11957 posts, RR: 51 Reply 19, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 1157 times:
Pilot727aa From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 136 posts, RR: 0 Reply 20, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 1157 times:
Does anyone know about JetBlue serving DFW any time soon?
Sponsor Message: 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 31157 posts, 
From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4935 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
