Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Runway Lengths And Trafic  
User currently offlineKimmykun From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 445 posts, RR: 2
Posted (12 years 10 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2291 times:

Hey, all. A couple days ago in the Puerto Rico newspaper El Nuevo Día, there was an article about a proposed lengthening of PSE's runway of an extra 1,000 feet, provided that the local environmental agency (Recursos Naturales) can move a small river and a watering system out of the way. The reason for this is to try and drum up some more operations for the underused airport which runs at a loss of $3 million a year.

Now my question is; has something like this actually worked before? PSE's 6,904-foot runway is already capable of jet service so I'm just wondering how a 7,904-foot runway is going to do any better at getting service to that airport. Anyone?

Edit: PSE is Ponce Mercedita Airport in Ponce, PR. I forget that the name doesn't show up when you put the cursor over the code. Sorry.

[Edited 2003-08-02 00:01:21]

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineSpotterboy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 10 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2281 times:

I don't know an exact answer - but here at INN - we needed a larger safety zone after the runway end - we would also had to move the local river wich is right behind the airport.... But for the town heads no way to do this. now our runway will be shortend a little....  Angry

User currently offlineTom in NO From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7194 posts, RR: 31
Reply 2, posted (12 years 10 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2262 times:

Runway extensions usually have two purposes:
1) safety: increase clearances over surrounding areas, be they neighborhoods, terrain, or other. Also to be considered is aircraft safety in inclement weather.
2) Airline route planners will look at a 7,900' runway as being more operationally advantageous than a 6,900' runway. The old axiom that "every little bit helps' actually has merit here. Probably wouldn't drastically increase service, but it will get noticed.

Tom at MSY

"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Runway Lengths posted Sun Aug 20 2006 23:42:15 by Skibum9
Runway Buffers And Required Space posted Fri Dec 16 2005 01:51:44 by Reins485
Off-runway 707 And Crashed 737 On Google Maps! posted Mon Aug 22 2005 02:31:26 by BrunoSBGR
BHM Runway Expansion And Terminal A? posted Wed Jun 8 2005 21:55:55 by WA727
Minimum Runway Lengths For Some Common Airliners posted Tue Mar 1 2005 00:20:25 by Mainrunway
Runway Lengths posted Fri Dec 5 2003 17:24:07 by CKT789
BUF Runway Info And IAG News posted Tue May 27 2003 22:29:40 by Zrb2
Whats The Difference At Kaitaks Runway 13 And 31? posted Mon Nov 5 2001 02:51:20 by Apollo13
UK Airport Runway Lengths posted Sun Jul 22 2001 14:52:20 by By738
Minimum Runway Lengths posted Wed Jul 4 2001 22:11:09 by SAA-SAL