Elwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (11 years 6 months 4 weeks ago) and read 3995 times:
That's because if you book online, they don't have to pay someone at the reservations center their little commission for selling seats. Further, if you use online or self-service checkin, they don't have to pay as many ticket-counter agents. Just one for every four check-in kiosks.
By the way: Don't use NW self-service check-in at EWR. I stood around for fifteen minutes waiting for them to take my checked luggage while others got ahead of me. Every time I spoke up, no one paid any attention.
CO at SEA, on the other hand, was precisely the opposite experience.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.
StevenUhl777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 6 months 4 weeks ago) and read 3976 times:
Probably for a number of reasons:
- Most fliers have internet access and prefer doing as much online as possible, to make things simple.
- Fliers don't want to hassle with lines at check in, which is why they offer the easy check in machines.
- COST: cheaper for the airlines to have everything done online to save having to hire an employee
- So that you deal DIRECTLY with the airline, not through an intermediary that they have to pay commission to. This whole thing started when airlines decided to cut/eliminate travel agent commissions.
- So that frequent fliers don't have to wait on hold when making reservations
Luv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12150 posts, RR: 47
Reply 7, posted (11 years 6 months 4 weeks ago) and read 3965 times:
It is the trend of the times. They stopped paying travel agents commission so another cost savings, less res staff another cost savings, less res centers another cost savings, more self serve check in machines, more cost savings, boarding pass readers at the gates more cost savings, where and when will it end, it is here to stay.....
AA737-823 From United States of America, joined exactly 15 years ago today! , 6018 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (11 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3872 times:
Southwest claims that it costs the company less than $1 to book a reservation online. On the other hand, it costs them $6 to comission a travel agent. Their telephone sales reps fall somewhere in between.
So- they save big money over at Southwest with their online bookings.
Fly727 From Mexico, joined Jul 2003, 1789 posts, RR: 19
Reply 11, posted (11 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3794 times:
As said many times above: It costs less money:
1. Reduced reservations staff
2. No commission to travel agencies
3. Reduced paperwork (they just issue a boarding pass. No ticket necessary).
Also.... They are also looking for new ways of advertising their services; as you provide an e-mail address when you book, most probably they will send you afterwards -a potential traveler- some specials.
Cmckeithen: I agree with you. Their website and fares are the best on-line.
There are no stupid questions... just stupid people!
Airzim From Zimbabwe, joined Jun 2001, 1258 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (11 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3777 times:
As others have stated above it is related to costs but the biggest one hasn't been mentioned yet, distribution costs.
On top of travel agent commissions, everytime you make a booking through one of the many world-wide GDS's there's a cost to the airline. It is generally in cents for each RPB-Revenue Passenger Boarded. Each of those costs add up to millions a year in distribution costs. If you make a web booking on www.ba.com the booking is made in the host system and it saves that penny.
The internet has also presented quite a few problems for airlines. In RES and GDS systems the airlines know where you are based on the IATA sign in of the agent. Airlines can bias availability for certain countries and not others if they want more revenue from a different station. With the internet that goes all away, no way of knowing that the passenger making a booking from LHR-CDG is in London, Paris, Sydney or Khartoum. That is scaring the crap out of them.