Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Has Anybody Ever Seen A 747sp Take Off.  
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3596 posts, RR: 2
Posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3101 times:

I was wondering if any body ever seen a 747 SP take off on a ultra long flight. I wanted to know do they use as much runway as a 747 200 or 400, do they make a strong rumble like full size 747 on long flight. If any body ever watch a SP on a route like LAX- SYD or DFW-NRT or JFK-NRT please tell me.

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIkarus From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 3524 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3051 times:

I only ever see em do medium haul, relatively short hops. And boy, do they have performance - they shoot into the air like 757s....

User currently offlineERJ135 From Australia, joined Nov 2000, 680 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3051 times:

I've been on a Korean SP and seem many others take off and land.
They take of faster than a full 747 but then they were a lot lighter with the same wing. I'm note sure the engines were de rated for the lower mass but from memory they sounded much the same as a full sized 747 of the times.

I actually had the SP as a sub for what was supposed to be an MD-11 and the SP was old and faded but was still a good experience.



I remember when the DC-3 was new!
User currently offlineFly-K From Germany, joined May 2000, 3149 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3006 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Strangely, I've only seen 747SPs on short-to-medium haul takeoffs, probably because these days, they have been removed from longhaul service and only serve in odd roles.
Of course, on short hops, their performance is impressive. I'd say the noise is similar to other JT9-powered 747-100/200s. (never saw a RR-powered SP)
*plug mode on*

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Konstantin von Wedelstaedt
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Konstantin von Wedelstaedt



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Konstantin von Wedelstaedt
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Konstantin von Wedelstaedt



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Konstantin Von Wedelstaedt


*plug mode off*

Konstantin



Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been...
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3596 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2913 times:

Thank you for the information I would love to hear more.

User currently offlineZebfly2 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 416 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2862 times:

I can remember seeing Pan Am & TWA SP's t/o from JFK when I was younger. For some reason they seemed to t/o quicker than the -100 & -200 series. I guess it's due to the lighter weight as stated earlier.


Educate your children before others mis-educate them!!!
User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2832 times:

I saw these exact take off last week, an empty SP from Faro to Nice using as much runway as a full loaded 757, no big deal.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Luis Rosa



Luis


User currently offlineRydawg82 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 861 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2741 times:

I remember sitting in Terminal 7 at LAX when I was 9-10 (ok that was only 12 years ago) but still I remember United's SPs taking off For SYD...The Aircraft would rate normally, much shorter than other 747's, although it didn't seem to climb as fast as you would expect for such a sort roll...

Thats all I can remember...Ryan



You can take the pup out of Alaska, but you can't take the Alaska out of the pup.
User currently offlineCancidas From Poland, joined Jul 2003, 4112 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2722 times:

anyone know where i could find a video?


"...cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home."
User currently offlineFlagshipAZ From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3419 posts, RR: 14
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2638 times:

Yep. I've seen Pan Am, then United and Qantas 747SP all at LAX during their take-off rotation. Pretty awesome sight to see then. Just as loud as the standard 747s, but not as a long roll. The rate of climb, as far as I can tell is the same too. I've seen SPs in other carriers' liveries at LAX, but Pan Am, United & Qantas are the three I remembered the most. Regards.


"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3596 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2627 times:

Thanks again for the information.

User currently offlineTbear815 From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 704 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2544 times:

I flew PA006 SIN/HKG/SFO in 1983. SIN/HKG was N742PA 747-121 "Neptune's Car." In HKG, the -121 went on to NRT and LAX. SFO pax transferred to N536PA 747SP-21 "Clipper Lindbergh." Take-off roll long heavy out of Kai-Tak. About 12 hours flying time. VERY smooth flight (April). Landing SFO smooth until runway, then bumpy due SFO paving. I do remember there were no air vents above the seats and PA put up a paper wallmap with the provision for an unsked fueling stop in ANC. No need. Terrific aircraft with a smooth climb (fuel burn-off for altitude seemed smoother than a -400), easy cruise, and comfortable descent. Incredible days of flying.

User currently offlineMotorhussy From New Zealand, joined Mar 2000, 3195 posts, RR: 9
Reply 12, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2511 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank C. Duarte Jr.



My hometown of Wellington (WLG), New Zealand had daily Qantas 747SP flights during the early '80s because of the short runway and Qantas' old policy of being the world's only exclusively 747 airline. Flights came in from Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane on Australia's Eastern sea-board. And at the time, Air New Zealand had no international flights in or out - and this is our nation's capital - they'd recently retired their DC-8's and were awaiting delivery of the new 767 fleet.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © A. C. LEVESQUE
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Brian J. Gore



They (back to the SP's) were both majestic and at times ungainly looking, lifting off with incredible economy of runway length and coming to a halt even faster on landing.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank C. Duarte Jr.



Have flown on TWA, Pan-Am, Qantas and United SP's. One unusual characteristic is that they are even faster than a 200 series. About half an hour faster than a 400 series between SFO and SYD


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © A. C. LEVESQUE
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Torsten Maiwald



Exhilerating on lift off! The rapid acceleration was similar to that of a two engine craft, rather than the rolling build-up of its larger sibling. The high wing area to body mass made for an effortless launch.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank C. Duarte Jr.




come visit the south pacific
User currently offlineTbear815 From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 704 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (11 years 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2482 times:

Wow, Motorhussy, what a great bit of info. Never knew that QF flew SP's into WLG. Thanks for the great documentation!

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8002 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (11 years 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2369 times:

When I flew a UA 747SP from SFO to HKG in 1986, I remember the plane didn't require that much runway to get off the ground; the plane was rotating and left the ground not long after reaching the center point of Runway 28R at SFO.

User currently offlineStratofish From Germany, joined Sep 2001, 1051 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (11 years 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2334 times:

Seen an few, and some really rocketed into the sky. They´d outperform any lightly loaded 757 regardless of engines.
But I doubt they were going on long-hauls.



The Metro might be the Sub(optimal)way
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Has Anybody Ever Offered Commercial Airship Serv? posted Fri May 13 2005 08:57:07 by L-188
Anybody Ever Seen The Sultans 744 posted Tue Jun 12 2001 07:33:31 by BLACK BOX
Has Anyone Ever Seen A Tu-114? posted Sun Jun 4 2000 15:46:42 by Silverstreak
Has Anyone Ever Seen A ... posted Fri Jun 2 2000 01:32:17 by Boeing747-400
Has Anybody Seen VH-RON? posted Mon Jan 30 2006 06:41:32 by LPLAspotter
Has Anybody Seen The Heavylift SC5 Belfast Lately? posted Mon Oct 4 2004 08:30:34 by Gecko
Ever Seen Anybody Famous? posted Mon Mar 29 2004 23:40:46 by JrMafia90
Fenix Colombia Will They Ever Take Off? posted Thu Mar 25 2004 10:27:23 by Lan707
Ever Been On An Aborted Take Off? posted Wed Dec 31 2003 04:10:07 by Jmets18
Did Air Switzerland Ever Take Off? posted Mon Apr 28 2003 22:13:07 by United Airline