Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LAX Satellite Terminals  
User currently offlineAirVB From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 268 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 5138 times:

At the far western end of the airport, just south of 24L are three satellite buildings with extra gates. I've passed these by many times; however, I've rarely seen them occupied. Does anyone know when they were constructed, how often they're used, what they're for, and what they're like inside? I would think that area could be used for expansion and a new terminal.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sean Woodard



Thanks for any info.
AirVB


26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3504 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 5107 times:

They use as a over flow for the Tom Bradley International terminal I believe

User currently offlineFlagshipAZ From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3419 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 5085 times:

If I remember the layout correctly, each satellite at the west end has 2 jetbridges each...numbered R1 thru R6...the "R" meaning "remote". It's was built as an relief, or overload terminals when the Bradley gates are all taken. Flights using the remote gates are bused over to Bradley for customs processing. It was rumored some years back that underground tunnels were to be built linking it to Bradley. As a sidenote, whenever the President is in Los Angeles, Air Force One & her support aircrafts is almost always having all the remote tarmac to themselves. Regards.


"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
User currently offlineA330Fan1 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 856 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5006 times:

If there are too many aircrafts parked at the Tom Bradley Intl terminal, these remote gates are used...I have been inside the building when a Thai B747400 I was flying was parked here...the inside is just a building with a set of slanted walkways/stairs that lead to the aircraft. A bus is needed to get to here from Bradley terminal.

-Regards


User currently offlineETA Unknown From Comoros, joined Jun 2001, 2073 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 4962 times:

Actually, the overflow from TBIT and Terminal 2 use the remote gates. It's purely pot luck who gets the gates, although Lan Chile's A340 flights seem to be almost permanent fixtures (the 767 flights don't seem to be affected) as well as World Airways' Air Mobility Command MD-11 flights.

Last week Air China, ANA, JAL, Thai were also boarding there.


User currently offlineIloveBOI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 4962 times:

But why dont they expand or build another international terminal? Money or space a problem?

I  Love BOI


User currently offlineHa763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3636 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 4840 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The master plan for LAX shows 4 proposals. The plan that is currently the "favored" one is alternative D, which was added after Sept. 11. All plans added a whole bunch of gates. Alternative D rebuilds terminals 1-3 basically into an extension to the TBIT and adds capacity by adding a satellite terminal and adding gates to the backside of the TBIT.

User currently offlineLindy field From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 4772 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I flew Martinair to AMS from the sattelite stands back in 1996. The bus ride across the tarmac provided excellent viewing opportunities! The downside was that it was a bus ride...

User currently onlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 5791 posts, RR: 15
Reply 8, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4693 times:

You can see the alternatives that Ha763 mentions at:
http://www.laxmasterplan.org/



"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8021 posts, RR: 26
Reply 9, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4677 times:

Alternative D is a weak political concession from the mayor and does nothing to address the fact that there aren't airports in the Socal region with sufficient capacity or attractiveness to the airlines (in ONT's case) to supplant LAX anytime soon - large expansion is needed, and the sooner the better. Alternatives A and C would benefit the Los Angeles region greatly and take great strides to compromise with area NIMBYs - particularly the elevated ring freeway connecting with the 105 and 405 that would remove much-hated LAX surface traffic from surrounding neighborhood streets.


If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineModesto2 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2789 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4641 times:

I've also seen a few HA DC10's parked at the remote stands.

User currently offlineTravelin man From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3489 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4621 times:

I completely agree with you Aaron747. Looking at the alternatives, Alternative D would only increase annual passenger capacity by about 1 million people (out of 78 million) versus DOING NOTHING! And I've heard Aleternative D would cost over $10 billion! Completely ridiculous.

I personally like Alternative A.


User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8021 posts, RR: 26
Reply 12, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4611 times:

That's precisely the issue. Spend $10 billion for a bunch of security improvements to an aging airport, or spend $12 billion for brand new infrastructure that will last for decades to come and nearly double the airport's capacity. Alternative D is a not-so-thinly-veiled attempt to cap LAX growth and force another part of Socal to pick up the slack. That would be fine - *if* a suitable facility existed. Guess what? That's not the case.


If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineETA Unknown From Comoros, joined Jun 2001, 2073 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4518 times:

Today's loser was Air China.

I might update this everyday- gives me something to do!


User currently offlineAirVB From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 268 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4456 times:

I also agree that Alternative D is terrible! And I read an article that stated that this was the plan that was most likely to be adopted, unfortunately. I don't understand why they would demolish 1, 2, 3 and replace it with a single concourse with fewer gates.

AirVB


User currently offlineDelta777Jet From Germany, joined Jun 2000, 1247 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4401 times:

We went there one with an LH A-340 evening flight in November 2000 (LH452). We took the bus to the TBIT. Even there were emty gates at TBIT!
But even we arrived at 7pm I cleared customs, good my bags and ran to Terminal Three to catch the (now gone former Reno Air) American Airlines flight to Reno at 8pm ! I made it and even got an upgrade in First Class (Non Rev) !



Fly easyJet
User currently offlineETA Unknown From Comoros, joined Jun 2001, 2073 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4312 times:

Friday's losers:

Air Tahiti Nui A340
Air New Zealand 747-400
JAL 747-400
Lan Chile A340 (of course)


User currently offlineCPH-R From Denmark, joined May 2001, 5980 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4305 times:

You start to wonder if the LAX controllers are "punishing" the A340's, due to problems associated with it's climb performance Big grin

User currently offlinePicarus From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 299 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4284 times:

ETA Unknown-

Why would Air New Zealand be forced to dock at the remote terminals. It's my understanding that those are for TBIT tenants only. AN uses T2. Can someone please explain???

Thanks.



User currently offlineETA Unknown From Comoros, joined Jun 2001, 2073 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4228 times:

As stated before, the remote gates are used by TBIT and Terminal 2 carriers- Air China has used them twice this week and NZ probably gets stuck with them for their daylight KL / NZAA), New Zealand">AKL flights- the one time I used the remote stands was on a NZ 744 LAX-NAN-KL / NZAA), New Zealand">AKL flight.
When the remote gates are is use, Terminal 2 is being used by NW D10 to HNL, NW742 to NRT, NZ 744 to LHR, KL 744 from AMS- other gates are for narrowbodies. With Terminal 2 carriers, Air China and NZ daylight flights are not daily services, so that may have something to do with the allocation. As for Lan Chile constantly being out there, perhaps it's something as simple as they were too late in submitting their flight schedule paperwork to LAX planning dept.- I once worked for a carrier where we got the worst gate because of our tardiness.


User currently offlineIMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6280 posts, RR: 34
Reply 20, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 4181 times:

But when were they built was one of the questions. I have vague recollections of them in place long begore TBIT was built. Am I so addled in old age that I remember what wasn't?


Quit calling an airport ramp "Tarmac" and a taxiway "runway".
User currently offlineCch362 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 147 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 4178 times:

I left LAX on a 23.30 BR flight to Taipei back in March, and had to use the satellite gate. The bus took us from Gate 101 (I think) in TBIT to the remotes. It was a rather long ride - more than five minutes. The bus dropped us off at the base of the satellite gate, which is a rectangular block about the height of a three-story building. Inside is an elevator and a series of wheelchair accessible ramps leading up to the level of the aircraft door. There are no chairs, as it is not intended for passengers to wait there.

At the top of the ramps, the scene looks like a "normal" gate. Staff are on hand by the jetway to double-check boarding passes, and in my case, force me to gate-check my hand luggage because it weighed more than 7kg.  Pissed


User currently offlineETA Unknown From Comoros, joined Jun 2001, 2073 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4085 times:

Monday's losers:

Air France 777
Asiana 744
Lan Chile A340
Mexicana 757
Thai 744


User currently offlineETA Unknown From Comoros, joined Jun 2001, 2073 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 4005 times:

Tuesday losers:

Air New Zealand 744
EL AL 744
JAL 744 to Osaka
Swiss MD-11


User currently offlineAirVB From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 268 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3985 times:

ETA Unknown-so I take it you work at LAX?

I also have a question-I seem to recall there being a long satellite term with 5 or so gates that looked newer than 3 brown satellite buildings to the west of it. Do you know when each was built and where the aircraft you have been mentioning actually park?

Thanks,
AirVB


25 Tcttx : Does the Imperial Terminal still exist? I recall that mainly charters used it.
26 ETA Unknown : Don't actually work at LAX, but very close to it. Not sure about the specifics of the satellite gates- sorry. However, tomorrow I'm on Air China to Be
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LAX Remote Terminals posted Mon Oct 21 2002 19:11:00 by FLY777UAL
LAX Satelite Terminals posted Fri Jun 14 2002 14:05:02 by Crazyboi
LAX International Terminals posted Sun Oct 31 1999 15:06:02 by Boeing 777-400
LAX- Transportation Between Terminals posted Sun Dec 3 2006 17:43:55 by COERJ
RUMOR: AS To Change Terminals At LAX? posted Fri Sep 15 2006 05:45:17 by AirplaneBoy
America West Vs United Terminals At LAX posted Tue Dec 28 2004 13:18:03 by Haavig
LAX Terminals Shut Down posted Sun Sep 5 2004 04:57:28 by Bill142
Changing Terminals At LAX posted Sat Jul 5 2003 23:31:08 by FrequentFlyKid
Qantas Moves Terminals At LAX posted Wed Oct 23 2002 11:34:33 by Britair
AA Terminals At LAX posted Mon Nov 13 2000 03:20:30 by Modesto2