Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AirTran's New Hub  
User currently offlineB777UA From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 161 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 5101 times:

I would love to see AirTran start a new hub at St Louis. The market would be great now that AA is cutting Flights out and into the St Louis Hub.does anyone else think that it would work? let me hear yor input

33 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineRichierich From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 4264 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 4965 times:

Didn't work too well for TWA or AA, so I doubt AirTran is interested.
Besides, the omnipresent Southwest has a low-fare stronghold there now.



None shall pass!!!!
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4506 posts, RR: 33
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 4953 times:

Dear B777UA,

Please forgive me for being a bit of a forum Church Lady, but....

Your thread title is inaccurate. It says, "AirTran's new hub." That's a statement of fact. AirTran in fact has not announced any new hub. So your title should be a question, say, "STL as potential AirTran hub?" or something like that. This has been a big etiquette issue at our forum. Many of us hear about important airline decisions first at this forum, and we don't need people crying wolf!

Also, there have been many threads on this topic recently. If you do a search you can learn a lot about the topic, before you start a new discussion on it.

Yes, St. Louis would be a good potential AirTran hub. There are lots of FL markets that don't have Southwest which have good low-fare O & D potential from STL. FL could probably operate alongside FL at St Louis well, the way they do at BWI. Along with ATL, DFW, MSP, LGA, MKE, BNA and PHL would all probably have good O & D potential for AirTran at STL.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4506 posts, RR: 33
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 4916 times:

Richierich....AA is downsizing STL as part of a redeployment of capacity. It's more efficient for them in the restructuring industry and weak economy, to route pax through bigger hubs at ORD and DFW. They can better concentrate people to offer more connecting opportunities. They can also use bigger a/c (which offer lower operating costs) and/or more frequencies (which are more attractive esp. to business pax) by doing this.

STL is not likely much weaker as a hub market than it was three years ago. O & D for Cartel-network carriers is weaker everywhere, for sure. But it doesn't make sense for the current industry makeup for AA to keep the old TWA hub there. A low-fare carrier hub, however, might generate enough O & D on the many routes Southwest doesn't fly, to run a good STL operation.

Southwest's "10 daily 737's or no service" policy limits them. AirTran is willing to enter markets with as few as 3-5 dailies, so they can enter more markets. That means more potential spokes from any potential hub city, over time. Which makes a lot more cities around St. Louis potential new markets for them, esp. if combined with service to ATL or BWI (DSM, LIT, IND, SDF come to mind).

Jim




Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineRichierich From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 4264 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 4830 times:

Point taken, DCA-ROC Guy, but I still don't see AirTran moving into STL anytime soon. Maybe they will prove me wrong, but I'm guessing there are other places on their list.


None shall pass!!!!
User currently offlineLambertMan From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2077 posts, RR: 36
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 4587 times:

STL could be potentially attractive to a few new airlines due to the fact that we have a whole concourse open, decent O&D at 10.5 million, and a city hall that is willing to bend over backwards to get a new carrier in here with a decent operation. I think its a possibility that we'll see FL or maybe even an F9 buildup, but rumors have it that PIT is in the lead for F9. Personally, I think they are using STL and PIT as leverage for the new gates. B6 has been brought up also, but they seem completely disinterested with the midwest.




User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4506 posts, RR: 33
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 4548 times:

B6 has been brought up also, but they seem completely disinterested with the midwest.

For now. Neeleman has made clear all along that JetBlue is not going to be what I call "TowerAir II," running only transcons and leisure-market flights out of JFK. They aim to be a major nationwide airline with over 400 planes, and that means they'll have to land in flyover country as well.

Once the smaller, frequency-friendly Embraer 190's start coming online, JetBlue will probably enter a number of Midwestern markets. Big A320's could probably serve Chicago and maybe St. Louis at sufficient yield to JFK and OAK. But that A/C is too big to anchor a full-scale hub including medium-size business market spokes, at STL or elsewhere.

Whether JetBlue will operate a Midwestern hub remains to be seen, but they'll be in the region, probably sooner rather than later.

Jim





Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offline727LOVER From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 6439 posts, RR: 17
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 4519 times:

How many gates is AA gonna give up?

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bevin Shively




Listen Betty, don't start up with your 'White Zone' s*** again.
User currently offlineTekelberry From United States of America, joined May 2003, 1459 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 4483 times:

How many gates is AA gonna give up?

Do you see the terminal to the right? All of those gates. AA's new ops will be based off of the terminal in the picture on your left I believe.


User currently offline727LOVER From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 6439 posts, RR: 17
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 4452 times:

So, that's about 11-14 gates. OOOOHHHH airtran, I see opportunity!


Listen Betty, don't start up with your 'White Zone' s*** again.
User currently offlineLambertMan From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2077 posts, RR: 36
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 4441 times:

Tekelberry, you are correct, they are giving up the D concourse and consolidating ops to the C concourse. It will leave all of D open, D is the second newest concourse after the E concourse, it was built for OZ in 83 I believe. The D concourse is decent, althought the lighting is dreary. I'm sure Mayor Slay would work with any carrier wanting to take up part of D. For anyone wondering if Southwest will take over those gates, the answer is no. They have 9 gates in E, and will assume the other 3 in E soon. For now, D is up in the air waiting for someone.


User currently onlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16872 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 4434 times:

WN's CFO during a recent investors conference call made it known that WN was "Very interested in doing something there (STL)" , what this entails I don't know but a safe guess would be that they would add service to existing WN markets that they currently do not offer "direct" service to from STL.

Such as..

Albany, Austin, Buffalo, Ft.Lauderdale, Hartford, Indianapolis, Jacksonville, LAX, Manchester, Nashville, New Orleans, Islip/ Long Island, Norfolk, Oakland, Ontario, Orange County, Portland Ore, Raleigh, Reno, Sacramento, San Antonio, San Diego, San Jose, Seattle etc.

If WN indeed has it's eyes toward expanding their presence at STL then Airtran would probably want to steer clear of WN, flying to existing FL destinations WN would not such as..

Atlanta, Boston, Bloomington, Akron, DFW, Dayton, Denver, Flint, Fort Myers, Greensboro, Gulfport, Memphis, Miami, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Moline, Newark, Laguardia, Pensacola, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Rochester, San Francisco, Washington National, Washington Dulles, West Palm Beach, Wichita.

Also Airtrans "possible" plans for STL would also revolve around AA's plans, and how much of a gap AA will leave.

However if you get WN to add new routes from STL to current WN destinations that they do not serve nonstop from STL (like what I listed previously), and if you can get Airtran and AA to fill the gaps to places like Wichita and Laguardia then STL will probably be better served than they previously were by a single dominant carrier.

Also carriers like CO could upgrade RJ flights to STL from places like EWR and IAH with 737s, same with DL, NWA etc.

Also new airlines to STL should be encouraged like Frontier (on the way), Alaska, B6 etc..




Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineAtcboy73 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1100 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 4356 times:

Lets not forget the small B concourse. Isn't AA (connection) leaving this concourse also?

If so there is room for about 7 or maybe even 8 get gates there.

In my opinion, when SWA expands and other low fare carriers come in, AA will show little willingness to continue the STL operation as we will know it this coming November.

Im glad there are other people who see the potential for an Air Tran operation at STL. TWA proved that the people are there if the fare is right and maybe Air Tran and SWA have the right fares for the market.


User currently offlineLambertMan From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2077 posts, RR: 36
Reply 13, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 4311 times:

Atcboy73,
I don't think so, I thought they were going to keep B, but I'm not sure.
STT757,
-CO is going to add 4 735 flights, 2 to EWR and 2 to IAH (monopoly)
-HP has added AS / KLAS), USA - Nevada">LAS and another frequency to PHX
-I HIGHLY doubt WN will come in blazing guns and start all of those routes you mention, then on top of that FL come in. It wont happen. STL doesnt need all the capacity you mentioned.
Here is what I see:
AirTran waits for WN to make their move, when it is made, they will anazlyze their options for STL. If WN expands alot, there is almost no need for FL. If they add like 10 flights, then I think we'll see a FL focus city. I think they are waiting for the WN plan to annnounce if they are going to come to STL or not.
As far as you mentioning AS, I doubt it, maybe a daily 73G to SEA, but highly unlikely.


User currently offlineCapt078 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 421 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 4275 times:

i do not think stl would be a good hub for airtran. this is not necessarily to say stl is not a good hub location for another airline, but i would not recommend it for airtran. atl is too close to stl. for passengers going north-south along the eastern part of the country, atl and bwi serve the airline well. for passengers going east-west from the south, atl serves the airline well. for those traveling east-west from the north, stl would be more convenient than atl, but it would impede the catchment area of atl. i think mke or another northern midwest city would serve airtran much better.

if you recall, before the fall of twa, there was speculation that airtran would buy twa. in fact, airtran did formally acknowledge they were considering the move. of course, they decided this was not feasible, and one of the reasons stated was that stl was too close in proximity to atl, and it would not be economically viable to switch all operations from one to the other.


User currently onlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16872 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 4262 times:

"I HIGHLY doubt WN will come in blazing guns and start all of those routes you mention, then on top of that FL come in. It wont happen. STL doesnt need all the capacity you mentioned."

I agree, I was just listing some cities WN serves that they currently do not fly to "nonstop" from STL.

It's like a Chinese restaraunt menu, you can choose from the choices.





Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offline727LOVER From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 6439 posts, RR: 17
Reply 16, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 4187 times:

How about Spirit? or is that to close to DTW?

About 7 or 8 years ago, didn't ATA try to make STL a focus city?



Listen Betty, don't start up with your 'White Zone' s*** again.
User currently offlineWedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5911 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 4070 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I saw on a website that there is a new start-up carrier bearing the name Air Florida Airways. They looked at hubbing at BLV before the city turned them down. But on their website, they seemed adamant about starting up this year. I wonder if they're looking at STL closely now. Is this for real or a hoax?

User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12110 posts, RR: 49
Reply 18, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 4009 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

ATA had a FA base for all the charter flights they were operating for a brief period out of STL!


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineMidway2airtran From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 864 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 3809 times:

I had this posted in another thread, but figured it would be a better match in here. This is constantly discused since it is the most interesting topic........

Believe it or not, I see ORD as a hub in the rising. Might sound odd to some, but if you think in total about all that is going on at ORD, major construction and expansion on the way there in couple of years, very much a possibility. Only makes since to have hubs in the #1 and #2 busiest airports as an LCC. Plus add to that, a nice new west terminal in the ORD project looks like a good place. Plus it will take at least that much time to add a significant amount of aircraft (73Gs) to start it up while the focus cities add routes for the more current additions to the fleet. Remember Hubs and new ordered aircraft take time to get in place, even at FL's pace! From my prospective, I highly doubt STL at this point though it may become an additional city.



"Life is short, but your delay in ATL is not."
User currently offlineLambertMan From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2077 posts, RR: 36
Reply 20, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 3764 times:

Midway2airtran, I was under the impression that NW wanted that new terminal to start another hub there. Correct me if I am wrong. The Chicago area market in general just seems saturated to me with WN, TZ, UA, AA and by that time supposedly NW. Why couldnt AirTran start a decent op at MSP?What LCC has a significant presence there? Hmmm...MSP, STL, and to a degree IND with their new terminal in 06 sound appetizing to me.

User currently offlineMidway2airtran From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 864 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 3687 times:

LambertMan, where does the impression that NW would want a hub at ORD come from, just curious since that is the 1st time I've heard it? WN and TZ are fighting it out at MDW, AA and UA are in ORD and both are busy fighting for their existance. Plenty of space in a large Chicago market for O&D and good geographical location for connecting traffic at ORD. ORD wouldn't go forth with expansion if there was over-saturation. Plus, no LCC's exist in ORD except Sprit. MSP brings a lot a passenger traffic in for AirTran with FL's existing routes there now, but the location is out of place geographically plus not as high of a population base when compared to larger cities such as ATL and Chicago.


"Life is short, but your delay in ATL is not."
User currently offlineCapt078 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 421 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3598 times:

like i said in the other airtran post, i highly doubt airtran will position itself with a hub in ord. too much weather related delay and even with the expansions, too much traffic delay. atl is an exception because it is prone to fewer delays.

User currently offlineLambertMan From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2077 posts, RR: 36
Reply 23, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3570 times:

I was almost positive I heard something about NW wanting to establish a presence in the new west terminal.

User currently offlineMrLineGuy From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 115 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3535 times:

atl is an exception because it is prone to fewer delays.

I beg to differ. Yes, ATL has a better runway configuration but it is no better than ORD when the weather gets rough. I'm willing to bet ATL operates more hours out of the year on flow control as compared to ORD. When it threatens rain a flow management program is implemented! It'd be interesting to see, but I bet ATL is more delay prone than ORD. Anybody have any facts...???

On a side note, AirTran is not afraid of delay prone airports!! With service to all of the major airports on the East Coast and now starting to see large cities on the West Coast, it seems that AirTran is willing to put up with the delays (SFO for example) while other carriers (Southwest for example) choose to avoid delay prone airports (again SFO for example). AirTran positions itself where they feel they can make the most out of their available seats! Just my thoughts!

Regards!

Kevin
AirTran CS/RAMP
MDW



More right rudder...
25 Travatl : While I don't think ATL is MORE prone to delays than ORD, it DEFINITELY has it's share. This summer alone has been DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY of ground h
26 Midway2airtran : A major part of the ORD expansion is the change the runway structure to make them parallel, similar to what ATL has done with the difference being tha
27 Twalives : Before everyone gets so excited about expansion at ORD, it must be realized that all of the funding is not even yet in place so we are at the least 5
28 Capt078 : certainly atl has its fair share of delays, i was not suggesting otherwise. however, ord has more delays than atl. this is in part to weather (particu
29 Tommy767 : A good opportunity, a very realistic one. They need some sort of a hub in the west or midwest. Kansas City would not be a bad idea. If I ran an airlin
30 Midway2airtran : TWAlives, STL is a great place geographically, but I don't see much in the way of O&D traffic compared to larger cities. Wouldn't that 500 miles with
31 Midway2airtran : By the way I forgot to add a response to ORD funding. That was done about a week ago and now they are waiting for the final FAA word which I hear shou
32 Twalives : Midway2airtran - "By the way I forgot to add a response to ORD funding. That was done about a week ago and now they are waiting for the final FAA word
33 JpetekYXMD80 : "TWA should be in STL, it sucks that they got messed up by AA!" ummm, TWA went bankrupt by themselves, theyre lucky AA picked up all that they did, bu
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Where Should Airtran's New Hub Be? posted Wed Jan 2 2002 19:05:05 by 727LOVER
Airtran's New IAD-MCO Flights posted Fri Feb 3 2006 22:08:44 by Quickmover
Will FlyBE Make A New Hub Out Of MAN? posted Sat Nov 12 2005 16:49:59 by DptMAN
AirTran 2nd Hub Short List posted Sat Oct 29 2005 06:13:20 by Indy
AirTran New Website posted Wed Jul 27 2005 15:50:07 by ERJ170
Will Easyjet Announce A New Hub On The Continent? posted Thu Feb 10 2005 19:20:47 by Beaucaire
AirTran's New 717 Mods? posted Tue Jan 18 2005 22:43:02 by BR715-A1-30
NW New Hub To Europe posted Thu Dec 16 2004 20:12:33 by WingnutMN
Airtran's New 737s posted Sat Dec 4 2004 18:58:02 by Airgeek12
Ryanair - New Hub At LTN, 4x 738's & 9 New Route! posted Thu Jul 22 2004 12:01:11 by Gilesdavies