JumboBumbo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3360 times:
Do you think there is any chance that airlines that are moving toward flying only A320 family a/c like JetBlue and Frontier could ever (very long term) introduce A330/A340 family a/c as a way to initiate high capacity and/or international service? I know... Frontier already serves Mexico from DEN. In theory, this would necessitate only two pools of pilots due to what the folks at Airbus term commonality. This kind of already exists at Frontier during the transition from 732/3 to A318/319. Are there other airlines that have successfully made this move? After all, Virgin seems to have started off as an airline catering to "backpackers."
JBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4493 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3203 times:
As Srbmod pointed out correctly, it has been tried before (PEOPLExpress comes to mind first and foremost, I am positive there were a few more..Laker maybe?) and just proved too much to be feasible. For WN to introduce widebodies is just too big of a jump; a similar thing happened to PEOPLExpress...overambition led to the demise of that airline
Luv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12150 posts, RR: 48
Reply 3, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 3116 times:
Again agreeing with all said so far. Also if the plan is not broken why change it? The LCC's are doing fine serving the markets they are going after, and most markets can be served with narrow body aircraft after all. Just because it is International does not mean it has to be wide body. Remember before we had wide bodies it was 707's crossing the pond.
Mariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25963 posts, RR: 85
Reply 5, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3040 times:
Clearly, Frontier has it's eyes on south of the border. They've said they want to be the airline of choice for Mexican flights from Denver.
But what next? Will they add some inland cities - Monterrey or Mexico City? Or will they stick to resorts? Will they go further south, to Belize perhaps? I believe the A319/318 could go as far as Caracas, Venezuela from Denver.
Then there's the question of overwater aircraft. Presently, Frontier's flight to Cancun hugs the coast. Obviously, it would be a tad quicker and cheaper if they flew direct, but this would require some planes in the fleet to be fitted with life rafts, life vests, etc.
But only having a couple of planes in the fleet for overwater flights doesn't make a lot of sense for one destination, so IF that ever happens, then they could be looking at some Caribbean routes, such as Denver to Jamaica or Santo Domingo.
Cloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2959 times:
Skymark in Japan uses widebodies. That is the only low-co I can think of that currently uses them, or has used them with any degree of success. Well, ATA has some old Tristars and they were good for awhile. They have been mainly used for charter work.
Capt078 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 421 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2870 times:
australian airlines is another. they just commenced operations using all coach 767-300s. in the u.s., i doubt we will see an expansion of lcc's to planes larger than 757s/a321s in many markets, except maybe routes like atl-fll (which delta operates with 767-400).
DoorsToManual From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2842 times:
Not only Australian Airlines, but now Gulf Traveller is using ex-GF 767s.
Although not necessarily low-fares, there are plenty of low-cost airlines using wide-bodied aircraft - just look at the UK charter airlines. The charter airline model has incredibly low costs - high utilisation rates are also a feature here.
A number of these same charter airlines are now offering low fares too. Take Britannia or Monarch for instance.
These airlines usually operate 757s/767s and A330s on a variety of routes within Europe, and further afield to places such as Florida and the Maldives.
WMUPilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 1473 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2836 times:
The Tri-stars will be in service for a few more months. I've heard several strong rumors that there will be another widebody replacing the Tri-stars, however that may not be for a couple of more years.
KL911 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2003, 5372 posts, RR: 15
Reply 10, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 2776 times:
LH is using 737 BBJ on the DUS - JFK route, so LCC's would be able to fly 737/757 transatlantic if they wanted to. Personally I think they should since the transatlantic fares are still to high for me........ A 2 hour flight London - South of France costs 4.99 Euro, so a n 8 hour flight LON - NYC should cost 19.96 Euro...........
Srbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2674 times:
Icelandair and Continental do Transatlantic service with 757s, so yes it can be done, but does it really fit the LCC models? LCCs try to make do with as little frills as possible. A US-Europe flight would require meal service, which for most LCCs would be a luxury item. PeoplExpress sold meals onboard, so perhaps a similar type thing can be done. Perhaps the biggest hurdle would be getting the ETOPS certificate.