Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Was It Correct To 'nationalise' Aurigny  
User currently offlineManxATP From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 37 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 1 month 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1900 times:

I am interested to find out how other people felt about the fact the Guernsey states has bought up Aurigny Air Services. The company seemed fairly prosperous and had expanded over recent years. I find it hard to believe they needed state assistance to operate the LGW service, even in competition with FlyBE. Since the Billet d'Etat authorising the purchase the airline has announced further expansion into Jersey, which appears out of the remit of the Guernsey states. I can understand the obvious objections of FlyBE, although personally I don't rate their product. I am also interested if anybody has any information about the service on Aurigny in comparison to competition on Channel Island services (all the older tourists like their tea and cake!!)

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCapital146 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2003, 2125 posts, RR: 43
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 22 hours ago) and read 1850 times:

I have mixed feelings on this subject, but overall I don't think Aurigny being nationalised is a good thing.

My personal view is that this was something of a panic measure from Guernsey States as they have seen BA first of all cease flights to MAN last year and now pull the plug on the LGW route (thus ending scheduled BA flights from GCI). Aurigny has already picked up the MAN route and I think when they decided to take over LGW as well the States just thought that they cannot run the risk of the route failing and services to London being lost.

Whilst FlyBe offers its own services on GCI-LGW and remain committed to these, the States probably thought that it was too much of a gamble to rely on FlyBe as you never know when a reorganisation may take place and possibly cause the route to be shelved.

The States saw the opportunity to safeguard vital airlinks to the island and took control of Aurigny. On the negative side, if Aurigny's routes make losses, then the tax payers of Guernsey carry the can. It also means that the competition for FlyBe is not on a level playing field. I can see why they thought it needed to be done (though as I say, it seems like a panic measure) but the thought of possible subsidised routes against the competition just doesn't seem right.



Like a fine wine, one gets better with age.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Was It Impossible To Avoid This Storm? posted Thu Sep 7 2006 16:54:15 by LY777
What Would It Take To Reopen 717 Prod'n? posted Fri Mar 2 2007 00:11:01 by QantasA380
Did This Ever Fly? Or Was It Just A Concept? posted Mon Feb 5 2007 21:17:27 by Gh123
It's A Bird, It's A Plane, It's About To Hit Us! posted Mon Jan 29 2007 01:40:18 by Continental123
EAS.....Should It Continue To.... posted Fri Jan 26 2007 19:38:04 by Rsmith6621a
What Made AC Change It Schedule To TLV? posted Fri Jan 12 2007 14:36:53 by El Al 001
Pilots: What's It Like To Fly In The Back? posted Fri Jan 12 2007 04:15:18 by PilotRecruit
What Does It Take To Be A Pilot? posted Thu Jan 11 2007 02:43:57 by AA757BOY
Length Of Time It Takes To License Airline? (UK) posted Tue Jan 9 2007 05:22:05 by DCAYOW
What Would It Take To Get An Airline Started? posted Tue Jan 9 2007 00:07:57 by Speedbird747BA