Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
(Westjet) 'A' Pier Expansion Update For YVR  
User currently offlineCanadaEH From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 1341 posts, RR: 3
Posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 4067 times:

Plans were finalized for the expansion of the 'A' pier at Vancouver International Airport sometime this week. From what I understand, there will be five gates - three over-the-wing bridges, two regular bridges. The present 'A' pier is currently being stripped of everything but the steel frame. The side of the terminal will be all glass, which will be quite a difference from the dull 'B' pier of present.

For those working on the ramp - all gates will be equipped with gate power and airstart power. I'm not entirely sure about there being gate water.

While the gates are being labelled "common use", this project is for Westjet - and its about time they get their own gates!!!!

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3424 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 4032 times:

Well sounds cool.... and yes at YVR Westjet could use a few gates of their own! From now on Ill remember to look and see whats all happening when i pass throu YVR


What could possibly go wrong?
User currently offlineSpyderz From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 651 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 4002 times:

Good to hear Westjet receiving some new digs at YVR as the current B hammerhead is just plain horrible when busy. Nice to hear of the over-the-wing bridges being installed and that the pier look will be inline with the rest of the airport. I guess this means that the old commuter ramp will be demolished too. By the way, what's the time frame of this project?

User currently offlineGoose From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 1849 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (12 years 9 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3979 times:

Airstart power? Hrm, you might be thinking of a conditioned air units, not a pneumatic air-start unit. It'll be used for heating and cooling the aircraft without having to run the engines.... and the gate-mounted ones are already installed on most of the WestJet gates in YYC.

A pneumatic air-start unit is a different beast, requires a very large-HP engine and has a seperate set of hoses, and is only really used if an aircraft APU is inop. They're usually very, very heavy.....

It's entirely in my opinion to think that gate-mounted water service would be impractical, as the panel is on the rear of the aircraft, and hoses have a tendancy to freeze in winter. Of course, it's Vancouver.... so I won't say it's impossible.  Big grin

Hopefully the double-bridges will be more reliable once they get to being installed in YVR. I've heard of break-downs and other problems with the one installed in YYC....

"Talk to me, Goose..."
User currently offlineGoose From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 1849 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (12 years 9 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3925 times:

Hey CanadaEh, any word on whether WS will be continuing to use contracted ground handlers in YVR when this new expansion area opens up? I think the last airport which was expanded with them in mind was YYC.... and they opened up their own ramp handling group there around the same time..... right?

I've heard that their OTP out of YYC has gone up quite a bit because of the move.... I don't know if the renovation is connected with the move towards having in-company ground handlers..... as I'm just going on what I've heard from folks in and around WestJet. Just curious.

"Talk to me, Goose..."
User currently offlineCanadaEH From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 1341 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (12 years 9 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3897 times:

You're right, OTP has improved. There are many factors to judge when it comes to contracted ground handlers, so it isn't just OTP based. Only time will tell as to when Westjet starts their own ramp in YVR. I would think they'd start up at their eastern hub in YHM before here in YVR, in my opinion.

User currently offlineGoose From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 1849 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (12 years 9 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3873 times:

Someone told me once JetBlue goes by a formula... that if a station receives a certain number of flightsday, they go in-house with ground handling.

No mistake that the costs of going in-house are quite a bit lower, after the initial start-up of buying equipment and so on..... even compared to a contractor like Airport Terminal Services or WorldWide. It'd probably help WestJet's bottom line to start up ground handling in its "major" bases.....

And yeah, I've heard that YHM is a front-runner for the next base to go in-house, and that seems logical due to YHM's prominance as WS' eastern hub.....

"Talk to me, Goose..."
User currently offlineCanadaEH From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 1341 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (12 years 9 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3826 times:

That formula sounds like a good idea. When WFS bid on the contact for Westjet years ago, it was their first contract at the time and their way of getting into YVR - it was obviously a very cheap contract for Westjet. Through the grapevine I've heard that Worldwide looses money on the contract right now, so it really doesn't make sense for Westjet to start up its own ground handling here. I can't see Westjet starting up until the contract is about to expire.

With the recent announcement of the charter deal with AT, YVR's charter schedule will be almost triple what it was last year (from drafts I've seen on paper). This winter will make YVR the second largest base for Westjet, so that may also play a factor in any decisions. If you don't mind me asking Goose, what is it that you do?

User currently offlineGoose From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 1849 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (12 years 9 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3800 times:

It also helps public perception, IMO. It helps if the airline has control over ground handlers, and how their uniforms, equipment and so on look...... because I've seen some God-awful looking GSE in my time.... it can really bolster the opinion and confidence of folks flying the airline. Especially if the equipment is clean and the uniforms on the guys look decent - I've seen WS' ramp guys in YYC a couple times, and they do look a lot better than some of the contract guys I've seen around the country.

It doesn't help the airline's image if their contracted ground handlers look like a bunch of bums, operating crappy-looking equipment with the paint peeling off, and belching smoke (I wouldn't say it if I haven't seen it)..... most airline pax don't know the difference; They assume that the people loading the bags and whatever else work for the airline they're flying on.

There's also the sense of "pride," I suppose, when it comes down to it. Guys who work for the airline are more likely to "go the extra mile," and treat the customer's property with the utmost care, because they understand the company's image... and tie their own success to that of the airline. But that's a little less tangible.

"Talk to me, Goose..."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Pictures Of New Westjet A Pier In YVR posted Thu Jul 8 2004 03:17:03 by CanadaEH
Boeing Order's Update For 11/28/06 posted Thu Nov 30 2006 16:44:01 by NYC777
AEA Traffic Update For European Airlines - SEP06 posted Fri Nov 24 2006 16:38:18 by Stylo777
Spanair Expansion Plans For 2007 posted Sun Nov 19 2006 20:06:59 by RAFVC10
Update For Painted A340 Conviasa posted Fri Sep 29 2006 18:50:24 by FCKC
Boeing Order Update For 8/22/2006 posted Thu Aug 24 2006 17:50:26 by NYC777
SEP Schedule Update For US posted Tue Jun 20 2006 18:58:24 by PVD757
SIA Aircraft Decision Update For May 9th Meeting posted Tue Apr 11 2006 17:34:21 by DIA
Any UA Expansion Planned For MIA? posted Sat Mar 4 2006 02:33:23 by NWairlnk07
Boeing Order Update For 2/28/2006 posted Thu Mar 2 2006 18:27:35 by NYC777