Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
NZ 5th Freedom Rights HKG - LHR?  
User currently offlineMotorhussy From New Zealand, joined Mar 2000, 3135 posts, RR: 9
Posted (10 years 11 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3354 times:

I remember reading ages ago that the Chinese Aviation Authority had been granted Air New Zealand fifth freedom rights between Hong Kong and London/Heathrow so as to provide better competition to CX. Can anyone confirm or deny this? Was it a mental aberration?


come visit the south pacific
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineB-HXB From New Zealand, joined Jan 2001, 745 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 11 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3314 times:

What do you mean, to provide better competition to CX? HKG/LHR is currently operated also by BA and VS...

But yes, I believe Air NZ does have the right to fly between HKG and LHR.


User currently offlineV2fix From New Zealand, joined Mar 2003, 368 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (10 years 11 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3247 times:

Yes they do. but ..............................

They cannot get landing rights and slot at LHR ! There have been talks with UK government, but why should they add competition to a sector flown by the big two UK airlines, and to a foreign company!

See the problem !

Interestingly I have heard that SAA have just been 'granted' two new morning slots at LHR. Obviously SAA has managed to persuade UK government where Air New Zealand has not yet been able to.










742; 744; DC10, DC3, 321, 320, 319, 170,190, 772, 773,333, 346, 343
User currently offlineMotorhussy From New Zealand, joined Mar 2000, 3135 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (10 years 11 months 12 hours ago) and read 3126 times:




B-HXB

Whoa back off buddy, it wasn't me who said anything about a provision of more competition to CX, I was referring to an article I'd read about the Chinese Aviation Authority's (CAAC?) motivation. The former Crown Colony is now reunited with The Peoples' Republic and being the only non-state owned airline (Dragon is partially state owned), CX is a bit of a thorn in the side as its owners (Swire Group and ?) provide a better standard of airline than that of the mainland - further evidence of the success of market driven capitalism.

And in regard to current competition, remember that BA is part of an alliance with CX where they compliment each other's scheduling. oneWorld ring a bell? So oneWorld vs Virgin. And I bet if you knew the stats on traffic % for each carrier, you'd find that Cathay has the lions' share.


V2fix

Thanks for the info and intelligent comment.
If NZ could get that leg running, they'd be one of the few airlines to offer a true round-the-world network. Would be a great marketing tool and another good reason to fly NZ.


Regards
MH








come visit the south pacific
User currently offlineB-HXB From New Zealand, joined Jan 2001, 745 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3068 times:

Sorry, Motorhussy, that wasn't meant to be a confrontational comment, just a general "I'm not sure what you're getting at"  Smile No offense meant.

But I'm not sure how Air NZ are viewing such a proposal anyway. Right now they're only running 763s on the route, and not even daily. Contrast that to CX who are running 10 flights weekly on AKL/HKG, soon to be upped to 12 flights.

As for the traffic stats, it wouldn't surprise me given that CX operate 3 flights a day to London from HK and also the only daytime flight ex-HKG.


User currently offlineMotorhussy From New Zealand, joined Mar 2000, 3135 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2988 times:

Thanks B-HXB

I think if NZ could get an extra daily slot at LHR, they'd start flying daily into HKG from AKL and on to LHR. CX do really well on the AKL - HKG route because of connections on to mainland China and Europe. NZ could then capitalise on this too. There's currently no Star Alliance partner on the HKG-LHR leg, one of the world's most sought after.

Regards
MH



come visit the south pacific
User currently offlineNickofatlanta From Australia, joined May 2000, 1485 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2943 times:

"And in regard to current competition, remember that BA is part of an alliance with CX where they compliment each other's scheduling. oneWorld ring a bell?"

Didn't think BA and CX code-shared on the LHR-HKG flights. On others, yes, but not this one. The schedules are hardly complimentary of each other - it only the afternoon Cathay flight from LHR that does not compete with a very similarly timed BA flight on the route. However, this is expected because they are no partnering on this route - only competing!


User currently offlineMotorhussy From New Zealand, joined Mar 2000, 3135 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2913 times:

Nickofatlanta

Sorry, do you really think of that as competition between BA and CX, it looks more like regulation between the two carriers to me. While not actually codesharing, Virgin is who they're really competing with to maintain their market dominance.

Regards
MH



come visit the south pacific
User currently offlineV2fix From New Zealand, joined Mar 2003, 368 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2869 times:

Just a thought (on this much talked about topic) but who is the body that gives permission for an airliner to fly a sector.

For the UK : UK Government (which ministry) or CAA
Slot Allocation at LHR : Presumably BAA (owners of LHR)

Anyone know the defintive answer.



742; 744; DC10, DC3, 321, 320, 319, 170,190, 772, 773,333, 346, 343
User currently offlineTG992 From New Zealand, joined Jan 2001, 2910 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2819 times:

Just a small clarification - NZ does not have permission to fly HKG-LHR from the British Government - it's not a problem with slots (although when we do get permission from the British end, I'm sure slots will become the next headache - although they are difficult, not impossible, to get!



-
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
5th Freedom Rights YYZ-United States posted Wed Mar 8 2006 18:10:28 by EddieDude
Your View On 5th Freedom Rights And Bermuda II posted Sun Nov 20 2005 19:09:56 by Wrighbrothers
What's The Definition Of 5th Freedom Rights? posted Tue Sep 27 2005 11:14:39 by RootsAir
Nonrev Travel And 5th Freedom Rights posted Mon Aug 29 2005 05:09:24 by MaverickM11
5th Freedom Rights Question posted Sat Feb 5 2005 05:37:54 by Kdeg00
Syrian Gets 5th Freedom Rights From Beirut To.... posted Thu Dec 2 2004 05:28:22 by Yegbey01
5th Freedom Rights Involving Mexico posted Fri Feb 27 2004 07:06:00 by DFWMEX
New Zealand 5th Freedom Rights posted Mon Dec 8 2003 19:13:39 by V2fix
China Grants 5th Freedom Rights For The First Time posted Tue Mar 25 2003 09:06:26 by Singapore_Air
MEX-LAX With TA And 5th Freedom Rights posted Fri Dec 6 2002 20:48:39 by Pzurita1