Singapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13711 posts, RR: 21 Posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3454 times:
Singapore Airlines Limited - a Member of Star Alliance - has according to sources according to the West Australian newspaper wants to start daily SYD - LAX flights before Christmas 2003 subject to an Open Skies agreement being signed between the Republic of Singapore and Australia.
MEL - AKL - U.S.A. flights could start in 2004. Both services possibly using a three class MEGATOP or two-class JUBILEE ER.
Regulators on both sides of the Tasman who fear a transpacific monopoly could ensue if Qantas and Air New Zealand tie-up, could have their fears allayed. United Airlines competes on the SYD - LAX route while Qantas competes with Air NZ on AKL - LAX.
Nickofatlanta From Australia, joined exactly 13 years ago today! , 1457 posts, RR: 0 Reply 1, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3325 times:
Very interesting - I hope SQ does start flying these routes. However, this article seems to indicate that this is contingent upon the Aussies and Singaporeans signing a deal, surely UA will be lobbying the US to go against this? Or does the fact that the US has open skies with both?? Australia and Singapore help?
Copaair737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 2, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3289 times:
i wonder if SQ will start up SFO-SYD or MEL-AKL-SFO nonstops. only one airline is serving the SFO-SYD route, and no other airline is operating the MEL-AKL-SFO route. wasnt SFO SQ's first US destination?
Aussie747 From Australia, joined Aug 2003, 1161 posts, RR: 0 Reply 6, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3113 times:
From Australia's media news (in general)- Singapore has been playing down the situation much like the hype of them setting up a low cost domestic carrier in Australia. I know for a fact the Australian Government is quite flexible on allowing Singapore Airlines to compete on the route so long as Qantas had unhindered access on allowing what was termed "Qantas to set up a hub in Singapore" - to what extent that means is speculation , but I do know Qantas is quite cautious when expanding new routes
As from the US perspective is there any news on that front.
BNE From Australia, joined Mar 2000, 3156 posts, RR: 13 Reply 9, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2967 times:
I am all for a Singapore flight that leaves SIN and flys to BNE before continuing on to SFO, now that would be good. Singapore getting everything it wants on a SYD-LAX or MEL-AKL-LAX routing I don't think so.
Singapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13711 posts, RR: 21 Reply 10, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2946 times:
LOL, you do get the JUBILEE 772s
Anyway, from media reports either way, it doesn't seem to me that the U.S.A. is having much of a say. Why is this? Is it because Singapore already has an Open Skies agreement with the U.S.A. or is it because the Australian hurdle comprising of Qantas, John Anderson et al is probably larger than the U.S.A. obstacles to come, or even, not to come?
QANTASpower From Australia, joined Aug 2002, 516 posts, RR: 7 Reply 11, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2884 times:
The Australia to US aviation market is worth about $3Billion a year. Do you think the Australian Govt would be stupid enough to just hand over a big chunk of this to a Singapore Govt controlled airline. The net benefit to Australia would be highly negative.
Singapore Airlines is in decline and is desperate to get this. We will see.
Nickofatlanta From Australia, joined exactly 13 years ago today! , 1457 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2866 times:
The article points out that this may be one of the ways in which the Australian government can approve the QF/NZ alliance (the govt seems to be for it) without losing face.
QANTASpower - I still don't understand why fifth freedoms are irrelevant. The fact is that SQ does not fly to any markets from Australia except their own home market. QF flies to many from SIN in addition to Australia: Hong Kong, the UK, France and Germany as well as Indonesia and Malaysia thanks to Australian Airlines. So, from a fairness perspective, I don't think there is anything wrong with a little bit of reciprocity.
Yes, it's bad for Qantas. But, is it for the consumer? No.
9V-SVE From Singapore, joined Nov 2001, 2066 posts, RR: 2 Reply 13, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2852 times:
SQ is not a government airline - although it started as one, I think now only some 40% of the airline is owned by the government.
BTW I'm sure QF will lose quite a bit of cash if the SIN government doesn't allow them to have fifth freedom rights to Europe. More than what SQ could loose if they aren't allowed to start AUS-USA services.
Marara From Australia, joined Oct 2001, 676 posts, RR: 0 Reply 14, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2841 times:
Who cares about fairness?? Its a business deal ! The fact of the matter is SIN negotiated itself into this corner, what australia will be saying at this moment is 'What can u put on the table ??' they have already given QF freedom to fly via SIN. Sure it may make a NZ/QF alliance easier, but i wonder if a NZQF alliance is more important to them than having their biggest competitor in its back yard.
If SIN blocked QF from flying via SIN i dont think QF will see it as a great loss an inconvenience maybe. They would simply shift their hub elsewhere (KUL, BKK, etc) most likely taking other airlines with them (BA AY?) aswell as the landing fees and other benefits (tourism, airport spending etc)
I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. Jerome K Jerome
Singapore 777 From Singapore, joined May 1999, 1006 posts, RR: 3 Reply 15, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2772 times:
Quite simply put, Singapore needs QF to bring all the transit passengers as this helps our tourist market. It is quite true that if SQ were allowed to fly Aus-US, there will be nothing that Singapore can offer to Australia that would be substantially beneficial to them.
Personally, I'd like SQ to refocus on their Singapore hub FIRST and get all their service standards right again. It seems that the airline has lost its direction in the last few months (or years) and I'd really really like to see SQ being up there with all the other airlines again. They used to serve a nice hot meal on even their one hour Singapore-Penang-Singapore legs for SGD330 round trip. Right now, I know Mum and Dad paid the same fare and are going to fly off next week but they will only be getting a pathetic sandwich as their meal (and that is why I had to give them advance warning so they will not be shocked when they board the plane). Bring back the nice hot meals and build better relations with your crew!
Ejazz From United Arab Emirates, joined exactly 11 years ago today! , 702 posts, RR: 36 Reply 16, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2768 times:
SQ is still a Government Airline. Temasek Holdings have a majority stake.
What business do you think Qantas picks up out of Singapore, a small island with a small population. I can guarantee that SIA picks up far more revenue passengers out of Australia than Qantas picks up out of Singapore. How many passengers do you think disembark in Singapore after flying there from Australia? Presently, its about 18% the remainder are all travelling onwards, mainly to Europe. Originating traffic in Singapore represents very minor revenue for any overseas Airline such as Qantas. Open skies between Singapore and Australia would see SIA laughing and Qantas wondering what to do with their new rights.
TNboy From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 1131 posts, RR: 21 Reply 17, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2740 times:
Another airline on the Pacific route wouldn't hurt, although if anyone thinks the arrival of SQ would lead to lower fares they are dreaming. More competition, more choice, but probably at around what you are already paying, apart from an introductory spate of sweeteners. Generally the lowest fares are bargain basement anyway from QF and NZ. And the Singapore girls would get just as tired and unresponsive on the 14 and 15 hour hauls all night across the Pacific as any other mortals. It already happens on their North Pacific all-nighters.
Continental From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5476 posts, RR: 21 Reply 20, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2589 times:
It probably won't be as good as it seems. The only way I could see that route filling up is if they offer considerably lower fares than Qantas. Aren't the aussies loyal Qantas customers? I would imagine so, they'd choose Qantas over Singapore. Seems like an odd route for them to fly.
Singapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13711 posts, RR: 21 Reply 21, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2579 times:
Vaguely related is this...
DEPUTY Prime Minister John Anderson said yesterday he would make a decision on whether to quit politics before Christmas.
The National Party leader, however, said he did not believe speculation about his leadership was destabilising the party or could hurt its chances at the next election.
"The answer is no, I don't. It would if it were allowed to continue for an inappropriate amount of time, but it won't," Mr Anderson told the Ten Network. Asked if the speculation would be over by Christmas, he said: "Absolutely".
Bd1959 From Australia, joined Oct 2002, 450 posts, RR: 2 Reply 23, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2470 times:
This is all very interesting.....the deal has long been seen as a sweetner should the QF/NZ merger go ahead but until now I couldn't see the connection. The question has been asked too - what would Australia gain out of the granting of such rights.
Just some speculation on my part...could the Australian Government impose route restrictions? How about them insisting that they must stop in NZ on the way to LAX? That would then impose extra competition on the likely trans-Tasman monolith (in addition to EK and DJ) while allowing SQ part of the deal it's seeking.
Oz777 From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 521 posts, RR: 6 Reply 24, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2399 times:
There are a few un-informed comments in this thread.
First of all, Qantas has a substantial complexing arrangement in Singapore, with flights to BKK, HKG and Japan. Just over a year ago the capacity (and uplift) were renegotiated - and QF did some bleating as to some of the restrictions.
The complexing arrangements were established to service the QF traffic out of London / Europe, and of course now also pick up the BA traffic with some 'bleed' from other carriers. For many of the international B767 crews, the SQ 'hub' was a long duty time away from Sydney, with short sectors and not a great deal of rest.
As to SQ operating SYD-LAX. The route authority capacity has mainly gone QF's way, and the only Star Alliance option is one flight on UA. NZ pulled out (one B744 each way), so there is an option for an early morning SYD departure (after the arrival of the o'nite SIN-SYD service) to provide an early arrival into LAX. In the opposite direction, again that arrival could get into SYD mid afternoon, to become part of the evening SQ service to SIN. In theory, SQ would only be picking up the route authority that was allocated to NZ/AN. Nothing much will change, as NZ used to be the major discounter / thrift operator on that city pair as it was.
Expect to see both NZ (and probably UA) code share on that second service. Will then give some flexibility as to Star Alliance schedules.
And if John Anderson gives up politics - expect to see him appear on the Qantas board sooner rather than later.
25 Nickofatlanta: Some quotes posted above: "Originating traffic in Singapore represents very minor revenue for any overseas Airline such as Qantas." If that is the cas
26 Nickofatlanta: Also, how good can it be for there to be only three non-Qantas-allied flights transpacific to North America from Australia if this alliance goes ahead
27 Wirraway: Singapore_Air "Deputy Prime Minister and Transport Minister John Anderson is due to meet his counterpart late next month with a deal considered a form
28 Singapore_Air: Ahh OK WIrraway, that's the same article I've rephrased. Depends on what the formalities within the deal are though. "Look at the prices they charge t
29 Nickofatlanta: Cathay Pacific - $499 from any of their US gateways (JFK, LAX, SFO) to Hong Kong or Manila on their web-site. http://www.cathay-usa.com/sitedefault.as
30 Singapore_Air: That's nice. However, what about during Febuary 2004?
31 Nickofatlanta: Unlikely that the SYD flight will drop during Feb as that's high season for Australia - it's the end of the summer holidays down here. HKG can be usua