Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A Possible Replacement For The MD-11.  
User currently offlineBAJMowiec From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 99 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3677 times:

Hey!

I'm sure that I was, and am, not the only person to be sad to see the MD-11 go out of production,and service with some airlines. Well, I was wondering, did anyone in here hear of an replacement tri-jet that MD or Boeing are planning? I know there was the MD-11XX, a better version, stretched version of the plane, which was planned to compete with some Airbus aircraft, unfortunately, the model never entered production. If anyone has any info, or thoughts,I'd gladly read them. The MD-11 always was one of my favorite planes out there ....

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBoingGoingGone From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3614 times:

MD-11 was a maintenance pig. With today's technology, there is no need for a tri-jet aircraft.

User currently offlineEham From Netherlands, joined Sep 2003, 448 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3526 times:

it's sad that the MD-11 is leaving so much airlines at the moment, I'm lucky Amsterdam is my home-airport !! We have plenty of MD-11 movements every day: KLM and Martinair  Smile/happy/getting dizzy I don't think there will be another tri-jet in production anymore. With todays technology 2 engine planes are cheaper to operate than the tri-jets.

But again...it's a shame that a beauty like the MD-11 received not that response it deserved  Crying


User currently offlineBeltwaybandit From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 495 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3475 times:

Not a chance. Why do with 3 engines what can be done with 2? And with Airbus and Boeing struggling to find customers for their widebodies, why would anyone else enter the market?

PS: McD Douglas is not planning anything anymore. The company does not exist. It was absorbed by Boeing several years ago.


User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3415 times:

The DC-10 and L-1011 had the most powerful engines of its day - even more powerful, I believe, than the engines of a 747. If you wanted to build a plane about 3/4ths of the size of a 747, you had no choice but 3 or 4 engines, and logically, you could argue that 3 big engines are cheaper to maintain than 4 smaller ones. They didn't realize how much of a pain in the a$$ the center engine would be to maintain.

Now you have engines of up to 110,000-120,000 lbs of thrust, and it's likely they could go still higher. The 2-engine, underwing layout has definately won out over all other configurations for large jets, unless you go the 4-engined route for whatever reasons (like ETOPS). It sure is a pity, because it's pretty boring for spotters.

Charles


User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3186 times:

MD-11 replacements:

A330
A340
A380
B777
B747
B7E7
Enough said.


User currently offlineTokolosh From Netherlands, joined Sep 2001, 365 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3001 times:

Personally I found the MD 11 a nice plane to fly in (also the DC 10 for that matter). The cabin was quieter than a 747 and all the landings I had were very soft. Boeing killed MD 11 production, putting the cap on 200 planes. What a shame. They are strong planes and that's why they are so popular as cargo conversions. DC-8's as well.



Did the chicken or the egg get laid first?
User currently offlineHlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2975 times:

I think Boeing should have kept the MD-11 line for cargo production only.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The B 747X. A Possible Replacement For The B 744? posted Sun Aug 5 2001 05:29:20 by United Airline
The Exact Plane For Aa's Md-11's posted Tue Feb 8 2000 19:16:24 by Bacardi182
Garuda And The MD-11 posted Mon Oct 2 2006 12:24:47 by CaliforniaMate
If The MD-11 And MD-90 Succeeded... posted Thu Aug 31 2006 01:43:09 by 1337Delta764
The MD-11 @ MSY Show posted Wed Jul 12 2006 04:10:58 by MSYtristar
What Is So Wrong With The MD-11? posted Tue May 23 2006 21:25:05 by Bh4007
Did The MD-11 Cause The Demise Of MDD? posted Wed May 17 2006 07:41:29 by TWAtwaTWA
Hel For A Sr Md-11 Serial Number posted Tue Apr 25 2006 15:03:16 by Hydargos
Delta And The MD-11 posted Mon Jan 23 2006 05:13:54 by TwoLz2Rn
Air Canada And The MD-11? posted Tue Dec 27 2005 22:16:05 by PETERMAX777