Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Here's A Laugh... Pilots Please Chime In!  
User currently offlineBoingGoingGone From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 1 month 23 hours ago) and read 2318 times:


4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineGoboeing From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 2791 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 month 22 hours ago) and read 2245 times:

$741 million doesn't seem that expensive considering PHL spent something like $200 million on one 5000 foot runway, and it wasn't even floating.


User currently offlineBoingGoingGone From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 month 22 hours ago) and read 2196 times:

Commercial aircraft don't have tailhooks. That moving PAPI and constantly shifting glideslope would be a hell a fun!

User currently offlineN844AA From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1352 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (12 years 1 month 22 hours ago) and read 2176 times:

Well, one of those proposals was for a stationary platform. Granted, it was a quarter of a billion dollars more than the semi-free-floating one, but in either case, glideslope wackiness would probably not be part of the equation -- how many airliners make six-hour final approaches? -- and tailhooks certainly would not. Remember, the platform only moves with the tide (or perhaps a tsunami, in which case approaching planes would probably be diverting far, far away.)

I have no idea if this plan is feasible, but it would not seem to be unfeasible for the reasons you mentioned.

New airplanes, new employees, low fares, all touchy-feely ... all of them are losers. -Gordon Bethune
User currently offlineBoingGoingGone From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 weeks ago) and read 1914 times:

Okay... For starters...

1. The Taxiway Ovals are open... Big problem.

2. They suggest supporting the cost of the project by turning the area under the runway into parking (terrorist invite).

3. It's only been applied in a bay. Their most recent proposal is to build it 3.5 miles off the coast of San Diego. Keep in mind, the waves out there are anywhere from 5-10 feet in height, rolling constantly.

4. To get to the airport, they propose a floating tunnel. Um... Yeah.. Okay

5. They want to put it in the middle of a whale migration route.

6. Oops! We over ran the runway, but it's not 50' deep, it's 500' deep.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any UPS Pilots A.net Members In Here? posted Thu Nov 7 2002 23:54:55 by UALrampORD
Pilots Chief Defiant In Mesaba Showdown posted Fri Jul 21 2006 00:31:34 by KarlB737
Pilots Wrestles Snake In Cockpit! posted Fri Jun 2 2006 21:34:17 by FXramper
Help! Pilots Please posted Wed Mar 29 2006 09:42:40 by AAden
Ntsb Report: Pilots Caused Crash In MO posted Sun Jan 29 2006 18:42:28 by Leothedog
What Happened To AF Pilots Who Overran In Canada? posted Sat Dec 10 2005 12:38:15 by 3green
Your Opinion Please, Hole In Tail Biman Bangladesh posted Tue Feb 22 2005 16:35:38 by Luchtzak
Will Pilots Be Needed In 30 Years? posted Sat Feb 12 2005 21:03:52 by Yanksn4
DL Pilots Okay $1billion In Pay Cuts posted Thu Nov 11 2004 23:54:10 by Aa777jr
Can Pilots Have A Smoke In The Cockpit? posted Sat Jul 31 2004 23:19:33 by GRZ-AIR