Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Iraqi Airways To Fly Again Soon?  
User currently offlineAlexG From Germany, joined Sep 2001, 95 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 5455 times:

Hi folks!

In the newest issue of the Deutsche Post World Net shareholder magazine "Nachrichten-Börse" there is an article of DPWN starting postal services in Iraq.

Alongside the text there's a picture of a DPWN van standing in front of an "Iraqi"-labeled 747SP, the latter with open doors and some sort of wire running up into the cockpit.

Looks like the SP is prepared to soon fly again?!? (Not related with DPWN, they use an An-12).

The a/c in picture seems to be YI-AOX (ex 3D-GFD, 5Y-GFD, 3C-GFD, P4-GFD, B-18253, B-1880) with removed blue cheat lines, since the grey parts of the belly are not painted alike YI-ALM.

Anyone some more info?

--
AlexG

19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4825 posts, RR: 44
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 5317 times:

The best fleet option for Iraqi Airways once everything stablizes within the country is Boeing 737-700/800s for Middle East routes and Boeing 767-200ERs/300ERs for long haul routes to Europe or used AB6s due to the extra cargo carrying capability but I dont think so the US Govt will allow AIRBUS to make a pitch at Iraqi Airways therefore it should be B 737-700s + B 767-300ERs used or new!

Key start up destinations will be LHR-FRA-CDG-AMS in Europe and maybe FCO.
Middle East will see DXB-AMMAN-AUH-JED-RUH-TEHRAN-DAMASCUS and DOHA.



User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7420 posts, RR: 50
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5216 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The aircraft that Iraqi Airways is most-likely going to get is second or third hand 727/737/747 aircraft to match the type ratings of the a/c the pilots are trained on. Just like Ariana Afgan Airlines was given old AA 727-200's to complement the 5 ex-Air France 727's they already had that survived the former regime. And they'll probably cannabalize the old fleet for spare parts since they are unlikely worth the make and effort to make the existing fleet airworhty again. And after a few years, you'll probably see brand new equipment in their fleet.


Made from jets!
User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1626 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5168 times:

Behramjee, hope you're wrong, as it would sum up world feeling on why the US went to war.....

User currently offlineStevenUhl777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 5066 times:

Rather than an ATSB loan, the US Govt. could send part of that $87B to UA, AA and US by paying way over-inflated prices for their old 733, 735, and 762 fleets, and then sending to Baghdad for use in the new Iraqi Airways!

I don't know...probably lost all my "respect points" for saying that, but what the hell....I thought it was a neat idea for a split-second...

By the way, "How is Iraqi Airways Doing?" (in spirit of all the other threads!)


User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 5046 times:


Hi!

This topic is actually very interesting. I really don't know how it's gonna be, if we look closely to Afeganistan we actually didn't see any Boeings beeing sold to Ariana, instead we saw Air India offering A300's. But I also know tha Afeganistan don't have the same resouces as Iraq, so my vote goes of course to Boeing, specially knowing that in the past Iraqi Airways had Boeings and I'm sure the pilots will have an easier evolution to the new Boeing models. If we pick closely Iraqi Airways fleet ( 727-200 ADV, 737-200's, 707-320C, 747-200's and 747SP ) the most wise evolution would be the 737-600/800's to replace the 727-200/737-200/707-320C, and maybe the 767-300's to medium to long-haul flights. I don't know what plans they have but I'm sure they will start flights around middle east, Europe ( major cities like London, Paris, Frankfurt and Zurich ) and maybe a flight to JFK via LHR? Just some ideas!
I don't think Airbus will have any chance! Iraq will be pro-US government.
Regards


User currently offlineStevenUhl777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 5024 times:

CV990: If I'm not mistaken, Ariana Afghan Airlines operated 727's. Right after the Taliban was removed, one of their planes was shown on the news, and it didn't look too great...but, there was also a feature on the airlines return to the air.

User currently offlineBrianhames From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 795 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 4993 times:

Check out Aviation Week and Space Technology (September 1, 2003). There is a article in there on page 46 about reopening the Baghdad airport. This is basically what it said...

It says basically reopening the airport is a big goal for the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) since its important for revitalising the economy as well as a sign of stability. However its going to be hard for several reasons, mostly because of the guerrilla attacks in the area, as well as as soon as the airport was reopened, it would be a obvious target because the rail line was attacked the day that train service was restored to Jordan, and the oil pipline was attacked within 3 days of reopening, so undoubtably the civil airplanes would be a target, sucessful or not. So therefore, no airline wants to be first to fly in to Baghdad.

Another huge problem for the airport is the lack of infrastructure, which has been more or less destroyed over the past 12 years, as well as the aircraft there have been stripped of parts and looted.

Right now the CPA plans to open up Baghdad (which would have 3 flights daily when initially opened), Mosul, and Basra which will cost approx. $91 Million.

There are a lot of airlines trying to get in to the airports as soon as it opens though. 30 airlines applied to Baghdad, and 16 for Basra. Right now, it looks like Brasa will open first, because its more stable as far as attacks are concerned, and 6 airlines currently have permission to fly into Basra when it opens in a few weeks, SAS, LOT, Qatar Airways, Gulf Air, Royal Jordanian, and Emirates. British Airways was also granted permission, but has not set a date.

As far as Iraqi Airways, 2 of 23 airplanes were destroyed in fighting, 8 were looted and stripped of engines (however most were found), there are 15 airplanes scattered in Tunisia, Jordan, Kuwait, and Iran, which have been there since 1991. Apparently lots of contractors have contacted the CPA to start up a new national airline, or restore Iraqi Airways, but it looks grim due to "huge debt and a 'demolished' infrastructure" so it may be a while, it was also mentioned it would take at least two years to get a new airline up and running.

Hope that answered some questions.

Brian


User currently offlineJMChladek From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 4886 times:

I don't know what Iraqi airways has for 747SPs (I've always understood that they just operated 742s), but there is one 747SP interred at an airport somewhere and its been that way since the first Gulf War. This particular SP is Saddam Hussein's personal jet and it is painted in Iraqi airways colors except it says "Iraq" instead of "Iraqi". So they might have just been doing an article on that jet itself rather then on Iraqi airways.

User currently offlineGroholsky From Belgium, joined May 2001, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 4723 times:

""I don't know what Iraqi airways has for 747SPs (I've always understood that they just operated 742s), but there is one 747SP interred at an airport somewhere and its been that way since the first Gulf War. This particular SP is Saddam Hussein's personal jet and it is painted in Iraqi airways colors except it says "Iraq" instead of "Iraqi". So they might have just been doing an article on that jet itself rather then on Iraqi airways.""

Don't know where you got that info from, but that 747SP says just as the others "Iraqi".

For info : DHL is flying twice a day into Baghdad with an A300.

Good day !


User currently offlineGroholsky From Belgium, joined May 2001, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 4693 times:

That 747SP's registration is "YI-AOX".

User currently offlineVCE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4518 times:

I dont think so the US Govt will allow AIRBUS to make a pitch at Iraqi Airways therefore it should be B 737-700s + B 767-300ERs used or new!
-----------

So it means Alitalia has somebody to sell its MD80s  Smile


User currently offlineCRJ'sRule From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 62 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4450 times:

All right, all right that's it! We're here to discuss airlines, not US foreign policy. We all have our disagreements over the Iraq issue, but if you guys really want to talk about it, don't drag us Aviation enthusiasts into it. Now knock it off!

Sorry about that. Just had to get it out. Anyhow, chances are that Iraqi will go for some type of 737 model, not because the States pushed for it, but because there are a lot more available on the second hand market, and they are capable of landing on short runways at smaller airports, making it desirable for use around the lesser developed, smaller parts of the country. I'm thinking that it would be smart if Iraq could get its hands on some prop jobs with smaller capacity, such as the ATR, DeHavilland Dash-8's, or even the Embraer 110, as they would be cheaper to operate and would offer less capacity as air travel demand to some areas in Iraq probably aren't too heavy. For longer travel, everyone is right about the 767 series. It has a long range and it doesn't carry as many passengers, so it doesn't guzzle as much gas and it's easier to fill. Just my 2 cents.


User currently offlineCustoms172 From Japan, joined Sep 2003, 58 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4373 times:

Im far from an expert, but correct me if Im wrong. Doen't the USA make some of the parts of some Airbus Aircraft? eg. the engines, or part of the engines. I think I remember reading that somewhere. I dont think the US Gov. would block Airbus form selling Iraq their planes. I mean after all, look at all the US carriers that have them.....

And for Groholsky
I can tell you one thing : American soldiers are sick of it all !!!

Are you in the United States Military? Probaby not huh.... I am, and I dont think you would have any clue as to what we are sick of. You need to think before you start speaking for the US military or Government.

Nate


User currently offlineElwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4361 times:

Remember, once the Iraqi government is in operation and actually running the country, the only reason why Iraqi might decide to not even look at Airbus is as a supplier is an "in-your-face" to France and Germany, who opposed intervention.

Once the Iraqi government is set up, it won't (or at least, shouldn't) be a satellite state in the manner of, say, Poland to the USSR. I don't believe they'll do it, because if I can figure out that it will create the same anymosity that has led to so much anti-US sentiment, then I'm sure Colin Powell and Rummy and Dick Cheney can figure it out, too.



Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.
User currently offlineAirChaos From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 17 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4322 times:

Please don't forget that Airbus is not owned exclusively by France and Germany but also by Spain and the United Kingdom who if I’m not mistaken proudly fought alongside and openly supported our American friends when the rest of the World turned their backs.

User currently offlineGoose From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 1840 posts, RR: 15
Reply 16, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4236 times:

As a second point, unfortunately my country was also part of this invasion -so by your logic don't we deserve an Airbus deal as well (as 20% owners of the Airbus consortium)?

I guess British Aerospace products don't come to mind.

The rest of the political drivel isn't what I come here to discuss. Beyond my original statement - which was blunt, but entirely factual - I won't discuss US foreign policy any further. I'll simply state that I disagree with you.

Personnally, I come here to talk about airlines, airliners and aircraft - not politics. If you want to blow the anti-American, anti-war, et al horn, I'd suggest you make the call in a site dedicated to it - like ProtestWarrior.com.  Big grin



"Talk to me, Goose..."
User currently offlinePER744 From Australia, joined Mar 2003, 405 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 4166 times:

I'm waiting for Branson to announce plans to start a new low cost carrier in Iraq  Big grin

User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7420 posts, RR: 50
Reply 18, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3903 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Since being furloughed from my job at NW, I just recently got a job with World Airways, and we are one of the carriers who will be flying into Bagdad once the airport opens. Hopefully soon the people of Iraq will have air service.


Made from jets!
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 19, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3885 times:

Quite a few cheap 733s available right now so could pick up some for Gulf flights and perhaps A300s or 767s on routes to London,FRA,CDG and GVA.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Iraqi Airways To Fly Again-But Why In Two Years? posted Thu May 1 2003 09:13:22 by Airmale
Metal Cutlery To Fly Again On British Airways posted Tue May 24 2005 13:42:06 by Squirrel83
British Airways To Fly 747 To Riat Again? posted Sat Jan 3 2004 12:36:36 by Airplanepics
More Merger Rumors Start To Fly... Again. posted Thu Nov 16 2006 18:09:45 by ZschocheImages
WSJ: Iraqi Airways To Acquire 5×737-400 posted Sun Nov 12 2006 23:59:29 by N328KF
US Airways To Fly A330 PHL-ATH, 767 -ZRH, 757 -BRU posted Thu Oct 26 2006 16:24:43 by A330323X
Kenya Airways To Fly New Routes To W Africa posted Fri Sep 22 2006 05:01:39 by Carnoc
Iraqi Airways To Sharm El Sheikh posted Mon Nov 7 2005 19:52:55 by Horus
Aces Colombia (VX) To Fly Again! posted Thu Oct 6 2005 14:36:32 by Komododx
Jet Airways To Fly To Birmingham According To... posted Wed Sep 7 2005 13:50:21 by Concorde001