Gerry From Australia, joined Jul 1999, 242 posts, RR: 0 Posted (12 years 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 4291 times:
The Australian Government plans to restrict access to departure lounges only to ticket holding passengers. People like ourselves who go there to get a closer look at the aircraft will be banned under a proposal before Cabinet to take effect by the end of the year.
The government claims there has been a "spate" of security threats and that this would help to alleviate the problem.
We actually had 2. One was armed with a wooden stake and the other with a baton and a knife and guess what? They were both ticket holding passengers. One of them actually boarded a flight at a small NSW town not a major airport.
What good is this going to do and why should we spotters miss out? What about the families who come to see their loved ones off. And the retailers down the concourses who sell to the passing trade?
I often visit Melbourne International and it is great to sepnd an hour or so at the end of the Domestic departure concourse (having gone through security by the way) and watch the heavies taxi past no more than 50 metres away. Give us a break - does this happen anywhere else? In Australia only the International departure area is restricted to ticket holders.
PER744 From Australia, joined Mar 2003, 405 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (12 years 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 4236 times:
As an Australian traveller I say that it's about time. The current system is rather convenient, however there is no real need to be in the departures area unless you are flying. The security benefits outweigh any inconvenience.
Ual747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 4216 times:
DFW used to be very open to visitors. No check required, but after 9/11, they started checking random people for boarding passes. Today, I just got an email from AA, that DFW will from now on be checking ALL persons for their boarding passes prior to entering the "sterile" gate areas.
Bd1959 From Australia, joined Oct 2002, 450 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (12 years 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 4189 times:
This will be interesting once the retailers get wind of it. QF Domestic at MEL used to have the majority of their food and retail outlets on the unsecured-side of the terminal - the screening being at the base of the "single" arm which held the departure gates. When QF expanded the terminal, it introduced a "second" arm with departure gates so - presumably as a cost cutting exercise for security - the screen was moved immediately behind the check-in area and all the food, beverage and the majority of the retail outlets are in the sterile area.
I can imagine that the retailers are paying huge rents so will be resisting any moves to restrict movement into the current sterile area. The security screening will have to move back to the "arms" of the terminal and so be duplicated. I can feel a new "security" tax coming on to pay for all this!!!
Positive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (12 years 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4176 times:
I think it's a stupid idea. They have security gaurds in the airport anyway so why the need to take this measure? As mentioned the 2 incidents both occured with ticket holders so it's not really necessary.
Jhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6206 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (12 years 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4124 times:
Yea, I feel bad for you guys in Australia. I was pretty ticked when they started that policy immediately after 9/11 here in the US, which made it much more difficult to spot. And now more recently, they have been detaining people for even spotting outside the AOA, making it very difficult to spot period these days.
....and now my government wants to look into my checking accounts and credit reports before they assign me a "risk score" when I fly.
Can I hear the words "Police State"?
Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
Paulc From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 1490 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (12 years 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3991 times:
In europe access to departure lounges has been restricted to passengers only, not the general public, for a long time - that is the point.
Whereas in the USA / Australia people could 'meet & greet' people at the gate.
Senliture From Australia, joined May 2000, 431 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (12 years 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3812 times:
QF just introduced their quick-check kiosk on the cityflyer routes, I used it twice. If you do not have any check-in luggages, you can just process to the gate as soon as you arrive the airport, and they got kiosks in front of the board gate, you can get your boarding pass there. All you need for the kiosk is just your QF FFP card or your credit card which you used to purchase the ticket. If the government really impose this law, all the kiosks have to move back to the terminal check-in area.
I concur what Bd1959 says, most of the shops at the Qantas domestic terminal at MEL are located bejind the security check, or if you want, you can walk 3 to 5 minutes to the international/VirginBlue/Rex terminal, you won't be able to find a Hungry Jacks there
Jcs17 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 8065 posts, RR: 37
Reply 16, posted (12 years 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3802 times:
Oh well, welcome to the real world. UAL747, what is that email you got about? Are you talking about getting you tickets checked before entering security at DFW? I have gotten that done all the time since 9/11--from every airline CO, DL, AA, UA.... Strangely, a few weeks ago AA checked my boarding pass before I entered the boarding lounge for a flight to LAX.
GSPSPOT From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3293 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (12 years 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3788 times:
Unfortunately, in the US it's been that way for some time... At least in Europe, they still have open air observation decks at major airports. Imagine that in the US! I haven't seen one of those since the late '70's here..... What a loss....
ILoveORD From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 220 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (12 years 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3731 times:
I know O'Hare international terminal never allowed people without boarding passes into the actual departure hall/lounge areas (and even some gift shops!)--though this is not required for those who are dropping off friends and family at the ticket counters. But it was possible for any visitor to walk through terminals 1, 2, 3 without a boarding pass (those were the good ol' days). Since 9/11 however, no one without a boarding pass is allowed in departure halls, they can only get to arrivals and ticket counters...
Backhanding the left into submission, one activist judge at a time.
Bd1959 From Australia, joined Oct 2002, 450 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (12 years 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3693 times:
JCS17: Oh well, welcome to the real world.
Why is restriction to Domestic Departure Gates part of the real world? It's not as though Australian Domestic Airports get overly crowded. The only fathomable reason I can come up with is that security might get overwelmed at times - but that doesn't stack up either. The most serious breach of security at MEL recently was when a off-duty Police Officer inadvertently took a clip of bullets onto a Christchurch flight - that's ex International where restrictions do apply.
Seems this is just another "world's best practice" which we Aussies are having imposed on us for no other reason than the rest of the world (ie the US) has it wrong.