Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Atlanta Airport Train Replacement?  
User currently offlineTLHFLA From United States of America, joined May 2003, 595 posts, RR: 1
Posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4249 times:

I though I remember reading a while back that there was a plan to replace the airport train/people mover at ATL with a new people mover system due to the current one's age. Does anyone know if this has or will take place? I am sure the current 20+ year old system has a lot of mileage.

The last time I traveled through ATL, I got on the train to go from Concourse A to D and the train stopped at C for some reason for an unusually long time. A recording kept going off on the outside warning passengers that the train was departing and not to prop the doors open, but the train never went anywhere for several minutes. Hopefully the new system will work out some of the bugs with the current one.

Bill in ATL
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineWGW2707 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 1197 posts, RR: 31
Reply 1, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4203 times:

This current tendancy to replace comparatively new airport people movers after just 20 years of operation is absurd. Was the New York Subway completely replaced by a new system in the 1930s? No. Was the San Fransisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) system rebuilt from the ground up in the 1990s? No. So it seems to me to make absolutely no sense to treat airport people movers as though they were private automobiles and replace them after a few years in service, with a newer and sleeker looking model.
The argument that they handle an excessive amount of traffic is easily quashed by the fact that though this is the case, they were designed to handle said traffic, and never do they face loads more severe than what you find on most subway systems.

What should be done is the existing systems should be refurbished and modernized. The rolling stock probably does not need replacement for reasons other than aesthetics, but could be freshened up, with perhaps upgraded doors, windows, paint schemes etc.

However, ultimately, the cause for all of these system replacements are probably the corrupt officials of transit system manufacturers. Having done a lot of research into the mass transit industry, I can say there is an incredible amount of idiocy, in particular, there is one rather large Canadian firm that also manufactures Regional Jets that has a tendancy to produce a poor quality product (but they are the largest railway manufacturer in the world, having bought out so many other companies, that they are virtually guaranteed to get a huge number of the orders).


User currently offlineDeltaffindfw From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1496 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4197 times:

Well, there are some 20 year old trains that need replacement - like DFW. That was a BAD idea when it was built and will be replaced with a very nice bi-directional train system.

User currently offlineTekelberry From United States of America, joined May 2003, 1459 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4144 times:

The system at ATL has a tendancy to create delays in the network. I was trying to get from D to baggage claim and we must have been sitting (standing) at D for about 5-10 minutes before the train even departed. Sometimes the train doors don't even align properly with the station doors. It's a good system except for a few minor problems here and there. Anything beats the trAAin at DFW - instead of delaying for 5 minutes, the doors open and 10 seconds later they want to close. Not to mention the blistering heat and small capacity of it.

User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6210 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4133 times:

I've personally never seen problems with ATL's trains; it seems to work great. If it ain't broke, dont fix it!

Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineWilcharl From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1183 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4114 times:

Those cars are new cars... Replaced in 2001... Bombardier Transportation built the new ones for the city.. What you have to realize is that when tranist vehiciles are replaced, they are going to be almost identical to the old ones for compatabilty etc... the comptuer system is upgraded alot in them.. the old westinghouse system was apparently a mess.there was a good article on them somewhere i cant find it but it showed one of the old cars laying outside of georgia tech... Apparently westinghouse became adtranz

User currently offlineAcidradio From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1880 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4069 times:

To make a similar comparison, building elevators (different direction of course, but still an automated machine that gets people around a building) are not completely demolished and rebuilt. Rather, they are refurbished and upgraded over time. The cars rarely need to be replaced, but moving parts, cables, interiors and automated systems get replaced and upgraded periodically. There was a neat article in the Wall Street Journal a while back about how Otis Elevator, a subsidiary of United Technologies (the same United Technologies that owns Pratt & Whitney), is pulling things along for the parent company as elevators are constantly upgraded, refurbed or at least need regular inspections and minor wear & tear maintenance.

Ich haben zwei Platzspielen und ein Microphone
User currently offlineTLHFLA From United States of America, joined May 2003, 595 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3958 times:

Come to think of it, the Atlanta airport train must have had some modifications prior to the car replacements, since Concourse E is new and the furthest Concourse from the main terminal.

Bill in ATL
User currently offlineHartsfieldboy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 552 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3926 times:

WGW2707- The whole thing isn't being replaced, just 19 of the oldest cars. 20 years is the expected lifetime of them and it's very reasonable. Another thing, train control equipment is meant to be replaced or upgraded over time. Newer control equipment allows for more effencent and accurate operation. You seem to be thinking of the infrastructure, like the tunnels and roadbed. These for all transit systems are meant to last forever with proper maintaining and repairs.

By the way, NYC subway uses 100 year old train control equipment, which is pathetic. It's sad that the system does not even know the locations of trains until it passes a signal. For a system as busy and complex as NYC's, they should be running the most advanced computer systems out there. Instead, they use ancient callboxs to let a guy in a room pull a lever in order for the train to go on a certain route. This should all be done automatically and nearly every other metro in the world already does that.

User currently offlineJcxp15 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 997 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3891 times:


I agree with the NYC subway, but it's 100 years old, and the MTA has better things to spend (i.e. 2nd avenue subway) than to replace the old system. It works fine as it is, but it will one day have to be upgraded.
They are in fact starting to do that though. With the new trains, (R142's and 143's), they are going to install CBTC on certain lines in the system (starting with the L then the 7, because of their simple routes). This will allow for better spacing etc...

User currently offlineMilesrich From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2078 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3824 times:

If a minority company comes up with an idea for a replacement, you can rest assured that Atlanta will give the replacement a long hard look. The Airport is run like a big jobs program. If you live in Atlanta, you know just what I am talking about.

User currently offlineFrequentFlyKid From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1206 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3777 times:

I've been through ATL countless times in the past year and haven't seen a problem with the trains, ever. They are very easy to use and if all else fails there is the stationary (if you will) people mover adjacent to the tram. On a sidenote, people complain that ATL is so big and confusing when in fact I find it to be one of the easiest and carefree airports to transit through. Not my favorite necessarily, but quite easy.

User currently offlineTLHFLA From United States of America, joined May 2003, 595 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 3712 times:

Frequentflykid, I agree with you about ATL - for a large airport it is not that hard to navigate. I am not really complaining about the train, it was just kind of odd the one time that it was delayed. I was thinking the replacement was going to be a new design of some sort instead of the overhaul that took place.

One side note about the Atlanta airport train, I always got a kick out of how they would develop new ways to keep people from proping the doors and delaying the train. I was there one time in 1993 when there was a loud recording that went off outside of the with a siren shouting at people to stop and not enter the train. The inside of the train had a robotic recording that was somewhat hard to understand. When I was there again in '99, the train leaving warning was replaced with a calmer sounding voice and signs warning people not to prop the doors open because they can't be reopened - leading them to believe that they will have there hands cut off if they try to prop them open. The interior robotic voice was replaced with a much clearer sounding voice that repeats each stop twice...."The next stop is Concourse B, Concourse B." I am assuming all of the fuss about people proping the doors open is due to the fact that it would delay the entire train network if one train was held up.

Bill in ATL
User currently offlineMidway2airtran From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 864 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 3637 times:

Please hold on, this train is abruptly stopping!! lol I like watching the people getting thrown to the otherside of the train when they are not holding on. It can be rough at times. I fly through ATL all the time and believe the train system is quite reliable.

"Life is short, but your delay in ATL is not."
User currently offlineJcs17 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 8065 posts, RR: 36
Reply 14, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 3608 times:

Back before the '96 Olympics, the system was quite unreliable. I can remember numerous times being stuck between stations for good periods of time on multiple occaisions. Since then its been much more reliable. Although the system lags when someone is blocking a door, the train at least stays at the station and doesnt stop in the middle of the tunnel. There is nothing better, well except for some chimes at European airports, than the chimes in the ATL train.

America's chickens are coming home to rooooost!
User currently offlineMilemaster From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1137 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 3594 times:

If I remember correctly, the "Robotic Voice" resembled perfectly that of a Cylon from the TV series "Battlestar Galactica".

Audio Samples:

[Edited 2003-09-24 05:08:06]

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
6 Immigration Arrests At Atlanta Airport posted Thu Nov 30 2006 00:35:35 by LearJet60
Atlanta Airport Question posted Wed Nov 8 2006 02:58:24 by Levg79
A Closer Look At Atlanta's Airport History. posted Thu Feb 16 2006 04:48:51 by JmhLUV2fly
Heart Pills Cause Bomb Scare At Atlanta Airport posted Mon May 2 2005 11:54:02 by Squirrel83
New ATL Airport Train Recordings posted Thu Apr 7 2005 01:48:37 by TLHFLA
Atlanta Airport Boss: No A380 Here posted Tue Feb 1 2005 13:20:38 by N328KF
Atlanta Airport - Exploring For One Day posted Tue Aug 10 2004 19:11:30 by Sspontak
MKE Airport Train Station Breaks Ground posted Tue Jun 29 2004 21:16:45 by Mikey711MN
Logistics Of 2nd Atlanta Airport posted Sun Jan 4 2004 00:23:44 by Mikey711MN
Atlanta Airport Renaming Stirs Tensions posted Mon Oct 13 2003 19:25:29 by Jhooper