Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could Someone Explain The DC-8 To Me?  
User currently offline727LOVER From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 6608 posts, RR: 20
Posted (11 years 2 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4273 times:

Of all the commercial jet aircraft out there, the DC-8 is by far the most confusing to me. Look at all these series:

-11
-12
-21
-32
-33
-51
-53
-54
-61
-62
-63
-71
-73

Did I miss any?  Laugh out loud

Seriously, this really confusing.  Confused OK, all I know is that a -71 is a high bypass re-engined -61, and a -73 is a high bypass re-engined -63. But what is the difference between -61 & -63?

What is the physical and visual difference in all these series?

Without reading the info, can you name the series of the following aircraft:

1)

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Howard Chaloner


2)
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Nik Deblauwe


3)
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Groot


4)
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ryan C. Umphrey


5)
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tom Turner


6)
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Stefan Sjögren



Your help is definitely appreciated.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


Listen Betty, don't start up with your 'White Zone' s*** again.
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePhilhyde From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 678 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4232 times:

There is a fair amount of information on Boeing's website

http://www.boeing.com/history/mdc/dc-8.htm

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/dc-8/



HoustonSpotters Admin - Canon junkie - Aviation Nut
User currently offlineMD80Nut From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 978 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4111 times:

Here we go:
-11, -12 Original medium range versions delivered to United and Delta. United converted theirs to -21s, Delta to -51.

-21 Improved medium range version with wing improvements (slots, among others) plus more powerful engines.

-32, -33 Longer range versions of -21.

-43 Same as -32, -33 but with Rolls Royce engines.

-51 Same as -21 but with turbofan engines

-52, 53 Same as -32, -33 but with turbofan engines

-54, -55 "Jet Trader" cargo convertible, same as -52, -53 otherwise

-61 Stretched, medium range version

-62 Stretched, not as long as -61. Long range version with improvements to wings and engine pods to reduce drag.

-63 Stretched, same length as -61 but with -62s improved wing and engine pods, long range

-71, -72, -73 Re-engined (CFM-56) versions of -61, -62, -63 respectively.

The pictures, without looking at the captions:
1. -54F 2. -62 3. -63 4. -71 or -73 5. -71 or -73 6. -62

This is from memory, so I apologize for any mistakes.

Cheers, Ralph




Fly Douglas Jets DC-8 / DC-9 / DC-10 / MD80 / MD11 / MD90 / 717
User currently offlineGr8slvrflt From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 1609 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4089 times:

The -10s were the original turbojet engined versions with water-injection used by, among others United and Delta. The -20s had higher powered engines and were first used by Eastern. The -30s were the original intercontinental models ordered by Pan Am and many foreign carriers. The -40s had Rolls Royce Conway engines and were used primarily by Air Canada and Canadian Pacific. The -50s had Pratt & Whitney bypass engines. All the above had the same size fuselage.

The -61 was a greatly stretched 50. The -62 only had a moderate stretch but had modified wings, pylons, and nacelles. The -63 combined the longer frame of the -61 with the aerodynamic improvements of the -62. The -71, -72 and -73 are CFM56 re-engined versions of the corresponding -60s.


User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4065 times:


Hi!

I'll try to give a fairly simple explanation:

Series 11/21 - Domestic version of the DC-8 and the first ones to be built
P&W turbojet engines.
Series 32/33 - Overwater versions of the 11/21 series, they could longer
routes and I think they had more powerfull P&W engines
Series 40 - Overwater version with RR Conway engines. The diference to yr.
eye was that the front part of the RR Conway engines had a
smaller air intake than the P&W engine.
Series 50 - Same dimension that the other early series of the DC-8 but with
P&W turbofans.
Series 55AF/F - All cargo version of the 50 series without windows.
Series 61 - Streched DC-8 with turbofan engines like the 50 series.
Series 62 - Shorter version of the 61, but bigger than the 10/20/30/40/50's
with new nacelles in the engines and with the biggest range in
the DC-8 family
Series 62F/AF - All cargo or with side-cargo-door version.
Series 63 - Same size as the 61 but with same type of engines and nacelles of
62 series.
Series 63PF - Special version built for Eastern with some features of the cargo
63 ones but built as a passenger airplane. In case of convertion
it was less expensive
Series 71 - A 61 version with new CFM's. This version was harder to convert
because of the engines it used before, they needed to make
changes in the wing structure.
Series 72 - A 62 series with CFM's
Series 73 - A 63 series with CFM's

Between the 71 and 73 it's really hard to see a difference outside, the only way is to check out the history of the plane and find out.
I hope this helps. I know that you can be more refined but my description is like a easy-reference book.
regards


User currently offlineBroke From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1322 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3887 times:

Actually there are 2 visual differences between a DC-8-71 and a DC-8-73. One is very difficult to see at a distance and the other is a little more obvious.

The first difference is that the DC-8-73 has a 6' longer wing span and all of that is on the other wing panel near the tip. On the ground you can compare the two and see the difference, but at a distance that would be a trick to see.

The other visual difference between the two models is on the engine nose cowls. The DC-8-73 has 2 vortex generators (or strakes) at about the 10:00 and 2:00 positions and the DC-8-71 does not.

The DC-8-72 has the same wing span as the -73 and it also has the vortex generators, but it is 20' shorter than either the -71 or the -73.


User currently offlineHlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 3769 times:

**The first difference is that the DC-8-73 has a 6' longer wing span and all of that is on the other wing panel near the tip. On the ground you can compare the two and see the difference, but at a distance that would be a trick to see.**

I think the same applies for the 61 and 63

I think there are only a couple 72s in operation



User currently offlineUPSfueler From United States of America, joined May 2003, 430 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3673 times:

Alls I know is that when I fueled for UPS in Rockford(RFD) I used to hate fueling them. Its a pain in the butt to park behind the wing and drag out your fuel hoses 30 feet then lug them up metal stairs, then connect the hose to the port.

User currently offlineJustplanesmart From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 724 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3541 times:

The pictures of the DC-8's are as follows:
1. DC-8-54F
2. DC-8-62F
3. DC-8-63
4. DC-8-71F
5. DC-8-73F
6. DC-8-30

The detailed explanations given as to the various series of the airplane by others are quite exhaustive, so I will not add to them.



"So many planes; so little time..."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Can Someone Explain Russian Airlines To Me? posted Fri Mar 12 2004 00:13:27 by Mozart
Can Someone Explain The LAX Runway Usage To Me? posted Tue Jul 18 2006 05:59:48 by Airplanenut
Could Someone Explain This ORD Delay To Me Please. posted Mon Mar 6 2006 23:01:35 by Andoo
Could Someone Explain To Me Why AF Ordered 777? posted Mon Jan 19 2004 18:06:25 by Amirs
Can Someone Please Explain This Pic To Me? posted Tue Sep 20 2005 20:49:53 by Pilotaydin
Yields, Revenue, O&D...could Someone Explain? posted Mon Sep 4 2006 13:55:41 by 8herveg
Could Someone Explain ........ posted Wed May 17 2006 14:45:25 by Provance
Could Airbus Offer The A350 To The Majors? posted Tue May 10 2005 22:48:18 by RockyRacoon
Could Someone Explain Route Applications? posted Wed May 4 2005 14:34:33 by Indy
Explain This Airfare To Me Please... posted Fri Apr 29 2005 22:16:09 by Greyhound