Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
747-400 Service Length and Replacement?  
User currently offlineFutureualpilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2598 posts, RR: 8
Posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks ago) and read 3768 times:

As we all know, the 741s and 742s served many airlines for 30+ years, and some continue to serve today. I was just wondering how long you think the 744 will serve with its operators, and what, if anything, will replace it.



Life is better when you surf.
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAA777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 2541 posts, RR: 28
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks ago) and read 3679 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The 744's have been serving for....up to 15 years now I believe. So, the majority of them have quite a bit of time left on them before they start to get phased out. Alot of people predict that the A380 will be the next 744. I think that airlines will definitley invest alot in the A380, but not to the extent that they have the 744. Very few long haul flights need that kind of capacity, plus the frequency of flights will go down: something that passengers wont like (i.e. they have less options when flying--flight times etc). It looks like Boeing's biggest project has been the 7E7, and not any newer version of the 747. For now, a viable option is the 777-300, which can carry almost as many pax as the 744, (if not more?). Hope that answers some of your questions.

-AA777


User currently offlineB4real From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2611 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks ago) and read 3628 times:

I agree with AA777

I will be curious if the A380 will be as fast as the 747-400 series (someone may know the answer to that).

The 747-400, and more specifically the ER version, could feasibly be manufactured for another 10 years. That would put a potential retirement date of 2033! That would have to be a record for a series of an aircraft. Granted the 747-100 and 747-400ER are quite different!

I wonder how far the 777 program will go. Is a -400 or -500 out of the question? The 7E7 still has some discussion on placement.

If there would be a replacement, a 777 series - 777-XER would be the replacement - more pax, another 500 miles range from the 747-400 ER.

A 747-500 or 747-500ER sounds scary! Imagine a wing with two GE 90s or bigger on it!!! That would need to be a very strong wing!



B4REAL, spelled like it sounds
User currently offlineShenzhen From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 1706 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3514 times:

I think Boeing are talking about another update to the 747-400, using tech that has/will be developed for the 7e7.

The latest I've heard is a potential entry date of 2008, yes 2008 for the updated 747(If they could sell any).

Cheers


User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3387 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3486 times:

for now you have yer B777-300ER. The range is fairly close to that of the B744, aswell as the passenger loads are only about 30 passengers less (give or take some), so for range/pax the B777-300ER for now will make a decent replacement for the 744. I think that the 744 will be around for a while to come, but personally I think that Boeing's future will be with the B737NG, B7E7, and B777 lines.

CanadianNorth



What could possibly go wrong?
User currently offlineFutureualpilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2598 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3443 times:

Thanks for the replies! I was thinkin the 773ER would be the replacement too, but that wont be for a while hopefully!
Clear skies all



Life is better when you surf.
User currently offlineB747-4U3 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2002, 988 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3333 times:

If the current 744s are around 15 years old, Boeing still has another 5-10yrs until it has to introduce an updated 744.

In theory, it could be done fairly quickly as they are just changing an already good design.

I think Beoing will have to be careful where it places this new 744. I think one that is slightly larger than the current 744, but smaller that the 380 would be ideal.


User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1595 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3144 times:

Unless Boeing to did a radical re-design, a new 747 will be pointless.

Any new product will need to have a comparible seat cost to the A380, and be desirable enough to have a good re-sale value to other airlines later in its life.

The B747 frame will not facilitate this without major expense and work - Boeing is much better placed concentrating on the new versions of the 777 programme IMHO.

Rich.


User currently offlineAirways6max From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 494 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3005 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Graham Hitchen
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Carlos A. Morillo Doria




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jay Piboontum
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Dreier



The 747-400 has been in commercial service since 1989, so not quite 15 years. A good many of the original versions of the 747 were in operation for over thirty years, so I would expect the 747-400 to carry on for at least another fifteen years. There probably will be demand for a replacement of the -400 by about 2020.

I don't think that the Airbus A380 will be a huge sales success. It is too big for nearly all the routes that airlines fly today, it will likely be a gas-guzzler and expensive to operate. I hope that Boeing can make a success of the 7E7 and it should consider producing a large, four-engined version of the 7E7 for very long routes--e.g, New York-Sydney that has the same capacity as the 747-400 and the visual presence of the 747.


User currently offlineAeroyu From Hong Kong, joined Oct 2000, 178 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2918 times:

Will some airlines will convert the B747-400 passengers to B747-400F?


Kai Tai - I missed you so much
User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1595 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2813 times:

Airways6max:

The A380 is designed to be efficient, and not a "gas-guzzler" (otherwise why would they build it?)

To operate at the break even cost compared to the 744, the A380 needs only 33 more passengers, with the extra space (232 seats) as pure profit.

source: http://www.airbus.com/product/a380_economics.asp

With seat cost being the main driver in carrier success (just look at the low cost carriers) this sort of cost saving I believe will be viable and profitable on the key trunk routes.

Don't forget that a shortened version of the A380 is also planned which would be more of a 744 size, and more appropriate to "lower" capacity routes.

Rich.


User currently offlineCx flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6532 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2687 times:

We plan to keep ours till they are 25 years old, which is quite a few years away. However it is highly likely that we will be announcing a joint venture plan to convert pax 744s to freighters soon, as was reported by Flight international a few weeks ago.

User currently offlineUAL777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 1519 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2446 times:

Richard, not meaning to be rude, but what is the yield on those seats. With some of the fares out now, you can fill a plane full and still NOT make money.


It is always darkest before the sun comes up.
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 7924 posts, RR: 54
Reply 13, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2390 times:

Fares sure are low, especially across the pond. BA are pushing NY return for £199 inclusive. After tax, that's about £80 each way. You wouldn't get to Portugal on easyJet for that, most days.


fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How SIA 747-400 Service? posted Fri Sep 27 2002 14:40:28 by ROP
KLM 747-400 Service To India posted Fri Aug 24 2001 17:52:44 by AIRNZ_747-800
Future Of 747-400 And 747-8 With British Airways posted Fri Aug 4 2006 20:11:13 by CX747
SQ 747-400, Which Ones Are No Longer In Service? posted Tue Jul 25 2006 18:29:40 by SQ772
Transaero Getting A340 And 747-400 posted Fri Jun 30 2006 11:55:41 by TommyBP251b
Mega ARK 747 400 And A Normal 747 400 posted Sun Jan 8 2006 00:46:52 by NZCH
Condor 747-400 And 747-100 Questions posted Fri Dec 9 2005 15:15:35 by AirAmericaC46
Phuket Vs. Thai 747-400 Europe-Bankok Service posted Mon Jan 31 2005 19:24:38 by DIA
Iberia And The 747-400 posted Sun Jul 25 2004 22:45:35 by CX747
AR Gets One 747-400 And 1 A310. posted Fri Nov 21 2003 03:33:22 by Matt777