TranStar From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 530 posts, RR: 0 Posted (11 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 5878 times:
I've flown four times now on Continental's 767-400ER in coach and really enjoyed it. All flights were on very long flights (EWR-HNL-EWR, 11 hours and IAH-HNL, 8 hours) . Decent leg room, very modern 777-style cabin and, as always, the great 2X3X2 767 configuration. Also, 764 has great lavatory configuration away from the rear coach galleys.
Has anyone flown both the 764 and 777 on CO in coach? Which is more comfortable?
I know 764s are not getting new BusinessFirst seats, so I would assume 777 is far more comfortable in premium class in CO.
CALMSP From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4137 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (11 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 5838 times:
hey, I'll admit if I'm flying coach I would rather it be a 767, due to the less chance you have of being stuck in a middle seat, there is only say 30 middle seats on the entire airplane on the 764 and even less on the 762. If you fly with someone, its great to get the "a,b" seats and have the "row" to yourself.
okay, I'm waiting for the rich to spread the wealth around to me. Please mail your checks to my house.
Ybacpa From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1108 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (11 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 5805 times:
I'd rather fly coach on the 767s. The cabin simply doesn't feel as much like a cattle car with only 7 across.
I've been lucky enough to also fly BF on all three (762, 764, and 777). To be honest, the new BF on the 777s is a big disappointment, so comfort-wise I see them as completely equal. I do not like the single middle seat on the 76s though, it always seems like someone is cutting between aisles right in front of me.
SkyTeam: The alliance for third rate airlines finally getting their act together!
Luv767s From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 271 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 5778 times:
I agree about the 767s. Although the 3-3-3 seating on 777s feels less huge than the 2-5-2 seating. But everything else is the same on all teh 762, 764, and 777s. I recently flew CDG-IAH on a 777 a we sat in the very last row with just 2 seats on the sides. There's lots of room back there. I think that's the way to do it in coach on a CO 777. It's very quiet and we always got served first directly from the galley.
-"...never have I been a blue calm sea, I have always been a storm"
BCAInfoSys From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5494 times:
OK, I'm going to be a little selfish and say that I prefer the 777, at least in the 2-5-2 configuration. That way, if you get the sides (which I ensure I always do), then you only have 1 person to get over to get out (if you have the window), or you're that much closer to the window if you had the aisle.
In my dream world, I would actually prefer 1-7-1, that way it's great for me. It just sucks for the poor sap in the middle of a 7 seat block!
Sllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (11 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 5353 times:
I've flown in coach on CO's 777-200 and 767-400 and the only perceptible difference is the 2-3-2 versus the 3-3-3. In fact, last time I flew on a 767-400 there was someone behind me talking about how much he loved flying on this, his favorite airplane, the 777!
ContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (11 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 5258 times:
I have flown on both the CO 777 and the 767-400 and I am almost indifferent. Both have excellent coach class cabins. I still prefer the 777 because it has a wider cabin and taller ceilings and you cannot beat its powerful engines and a feeling of being on a much, much larger aircraft than it really is. However, the 767-400 is equally enjoyable.