Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
IAH-AMS  
User currently offlineZona8 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 128 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 11 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1657 times:

I am going to be flying from IAH-AMS. My options are KLM or CO. I have never flown internationally on either, does anyone suggest one over the other. Most importantly do they have PVTs, the CO flight is on a 764 and KLM on a 744. Thanks for your help!

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCALMSP From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3944 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (10 years 11 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1646 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

our 764's all have PVT's, the service should be great, if you fly on KLM, it probably is a pretty old plane, while the 764 you'll fly on is at most 4 years old or less, maybe only a year old. Give CO a try, I'm sure you wont be dissapointed. Plus, the seating arrangement on the 764 is 2-3-2, much better than 3-4-3 or however they have theres.


okay, I'm waiting for the rich to spread the wealth around to me. Please mail your checks to my house.
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 2, posted (10 years 11 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1613 times:

Definitely try out CO's 767 service - the entire fleet is 4 years old or so.

CO is up there in terms of most modern longhaul fleet.

N


User currently offlineCopaair737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 11 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1582 times:

you could fly CO, with the 764, which is a young plane, or you could go with KLM, with the 744. Id go with KLM, because it was a European airline, but the choice is really up to you.

-Copa


User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (10 years 11 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1571 times:

I'd go with CO. I've flown both airlines overseas, and CO's 767 fleet is more comfortable than the KLM 744's. KLM is nice, however, CO's 767's are simply awesome.

User currently offlineAeroAussie From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 264 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 11 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1559 times:

I regularly fly between Texas and New York, and I always go CO because they have a few flights a day from IAH to EWR with 767/777s. These aircraft are very comfortable, and the service is pretty good. In addition, I have flown CO to Europe on three occasions, always with a 762 or 764. Their international crews are always very friendly and helpful. I have also flown KL trans-atlantic. They both have friendly crews and good service, so the difference is in the seats. Pitch on both CO and KL is limited, so the real difference is the PTV. So there it is...CO wins by a PTV. Have a good flight!
-Nikko


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
IAH-AMS posted Sun Oct 5 2003 04:58:23 by Zona8
CO IAH-AMS posted Wed Jun 19 2002 22:46:04 by Triley1057
CO Launches IAH-AMS posted Wed May 1 2002 00:22:29 by Republic
KLM Service From IAH-AMS posted Mon Apr 17 2000 01:41:23 by Hole_Courtney
Anyone Flown Privatair AMS-IAH Yet? posted Wed Feb 22 2006 18:30:24 by COrocks
KLM AMS IAH B737 posted Mon Nov 28 2005 23:18:43 by Christiaan
KL663 AMS-IAH Boeing 737? posted Thu Nov 3 2005 22:44:52 by KDTWFlyer
KL Privat Air AMS-IAH Already Promising! posted Thu Oct 27 2005 14:07:22 by KLMCedric
AMS-IAH & Then Connecting... posted Mon Nov 29 2004 13:32:37 by Anair80
CO 47 - 27 March AMS IAH 1 X FAQ posted Fri Mar 26 2004 18:25:19 by Qm001