Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Would American Airlines Ever Get Another 747?  
User currently offlineSwissINTLA340 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 87 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4437 times:

Would American Airlines ever get another 747 ?? Or in fact any other U.S. airline other than UAL? Consider their long haul routes and passenger load.


NO URLS in signature
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4422 times:

Definetely Not!!!!!, They have the 777. If they will get any new aircraft in the near future, it will probably be the 7E7 to replace the aging 762 aircraft.

User currently offlineFutureualpilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2602 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4379 times:

I agree with BR715-A1-30, AA seems happy with an all twin-fleet, and will even phase out their seemingly endless fleet of MD-80s soon to go to a true, all-Boeing/all twin fleet.


Life is better when you surf.
User currently offlineStarAC17 From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 3354 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4375 times:

Not likely, this plane doesn't really fit into the North American air market at all since they would rather have frequency over flights. For long hauls the 772 and 763 do perfectly fine as they have similar ranges to the B747 (at least the 772 does)


Engineers Rule The World!!!!!
User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4348 times:

Although I think a 744 in AA colors would look great, I just don't think it will be in the cards. For AA's network, the 777 is simply a superior aircraft in virtualy every regard. The only airlines that really need the capacity of a brand-new 747 are airlines with a significant presence in Asia. For most airlines, the 777 provides plenty of capacity for their routes. If it doesn't, the 777's efficiency allows them to increase frequencies if necessary. With competition coming from the A380, demand may significantly slack for the 747 series.

Which brings up an interesting personal point. In most of my posts on this forum, I admit that I have been critical of those who get upset about the decline of older aircraft, such as the 727, DC-10, L-1011, MD-11, etc. Generally, I don't see those aircrafts' disappearance as a bad thing because they are largely inefficient and simply outdated. However, I must concede that I will probably shed a few tears if and when the 747 is no longer in service. That would truly be a sad day.



"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 5, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4274 times:

I would expect the 777-300 if they require a heavier aircraft than their 772s.

I think the 777-300ER would be a switch, but they might get over their RR obsession.

N


User currently offlineAirways6max From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 494 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4212 times:

I think its unlikely. American does not have a lot of long-haul routes nor routes that are traveled heavily enough to support a 747. There are a few cases where American might be able to use the 747 and make a profit, such as Chicago-London, Dallas/Ft. Worth-London and Chicago-Tokyo. However, American probably believes that the 777 is good enough for those routes.

That said, I think American should add the 747 to their fleet again. The 747 is the most popular aircraft among the flying public. American did use the 747 back in the 1970s and early '80s, but at that time, it did not have the extensive international network that it does now. If only American had hung onto the 747 a little longer, it would have been very profitable for the airline and the 747-400 would likely be a part of American's fleet today.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank J. Mirande



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank J. Mirande
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank J. Mirande




User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4749 posts, RR: 43
Reply 7, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4154 times:

US airlines are now banking on having more frequencies than increasing capacity on core routes that is why AA-DL-CO etc dont have B 747s anymore as their 767s and 777s are adequate enough for their main long haul routes to LHR-AA), Japan">NRT-CDG etc. They have enough frequencies to these cities from their multiple USA hubs and pax from the West these days prefer more freqency and more choice rather than one daily flight with 400 pax!!!

User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 8, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4048 times:

The 747 is the most popular aircraft among the flying public.

I doubt this is true. If the public really cared that much about what aircraft they fly on, there would be 747s in every major's fleet.

Behramjee hit the nail on the head. Today's traveler values frequency much, much more than he cares about flying on a 747 or a 777. You stated that the 747 would probably work on AA's DFW-LGW route. Sure, it would, but that would mean reduding the daily flights from 2-3 per day to one per day. Most business travelers (who pay the most) wouldn't like that. The 777 has been a huge success for AA, and if they need more high-capacity, long-haul aircraft, this is surely where they'll go.



"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineMikesairways From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 689 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4020 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

As much as I'd love to see an AA 744 (or any 744 for that matter) fly into SJC...it just doesn't make sense.


The red zone is for the immediate loading and unloading of passengers only, there is no stopping in the white zone...(Ai
User currently offlineThrust From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 2688 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 3938 times:

Fat chance. American Airlines disposed of their 747s over twenty years ago. Not to mention, the Boeing 777-300ER, if they decided to move up, would make much more sense. The aircraft carries more passengers than a 747 and because it has two engines and has as long range. American is going bankrupt. Unfortunately, though I would be very interested in seeing those 747s in American colors, it is unrealistic because, if you think about it, if you have an aircraft equally or more capable than the 747 that has only two engines, why pay for four engines when you can pay for two at half the cost?


Fly one thing; Fly it well
User currently offlineFlyboyaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 3909 times:

Perhaps not the most popular aircraft to the public, it is the most recognizable....maybe that's what Airways6max meant. Anyone who knows nothing about airplanes can identify a 747.

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3837 times:

The aircraft carries more passengers than a 747

As great an aircraft as it may be, the 773ER does not carry more pax than a 747.


Anyone who knows nothing about airplanes can identify a 747

Or at least they think they can. As obvious as the 747's features may be to us, I sincerely doubt that an average mall-dweller could discern a lone-standing 747 from a 707/DC8/A340/etc.


User currently offlineMotech722 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 211 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3762 times:

While American used to operate the B747, the possibility of them getting a 747 in the future is highly unlikely. An AA Captain told me that the reason they got rid of the 747 back in the day was because it was an unprofitable airplane for them. The chance of AA getting a B747 in the future is not likely at all, but rest assured for everyone, he also said that the possibility of getting an A380 is out of the question too.

The 777 is a good airplane and has worked out good for American, and will continue to be the main airplane for the future of the company. While United and Northwest currently fly the 747, he did mention that UAL has been selling a few of their 744s that are parked in thedesert to international carriers to get rid of them, as that market for UAL is decreasing too. The 777 is a better suited aircraft for UAL on many routes, of course the 744 continues to serve as a niche on other routes.


User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12090 posts, RR: 49
Reply 14, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3645 times:

Thrust

AA did in fact fly a couple of 747'sp into the 90's, they were used mainly on the DFW to AA), Japan">NRT route, and even found service on the JFK to LHR route.



You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10645 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3515 times:

Yes, the US airlines prefer frequency over size. Because the US has so much space and so few people who care about environmental pollution compared to Europe.
But a consolidation process might change that. The fact that 747s have mostly gone from US-Europe routes is due to the fact that there are so many competitors. If, lets say, two majors in the US have disappeared in five years time (by bancrupcy or merger), and some in Europe as well,that might change. Then even holding the same frequency could allow 744s again or even A380s to fly Transatlantic.


User currently offlineOrd From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1381 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3318 times:

"An AA Captain told me...the possibility of getting an A380 is out of the question too."

While I agree American will not operate the A380 in the forseeable future, these decisions are not made by pilots. It's up to American's management team what airplanes they feel are best for the airline and purchase.


User currently offlineRichardw From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 3745 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3198 times:

"747s have mostly gone from US-Europe routes"

What about BA, VS and AF then?


User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10645 posts, RR: 9
Reply 18, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3098 times:

Richardw,
LH and Virgin also use 744s to the US, and NWA flies 747s to Amsterdam daily, but these few airlines are nothing compared to the masses of 747s flying these routes 15 years ago. Alitalia, British Caledonian, Olympic, Pan Am, TWA and more are either gone or fly smaller aircraft now. And Air Canada will replace its 3 744s soon.


User currently offlineAV8AJET From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1333 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2951 times:

I believe that I read an article a few years ago when AA still had two remaining 747SP's that they had ordered 2 744's. These were going to be direct replacements for the 747SP's on the Asian routes out of JFK and I think DFW. These were however cancelled and the delivery positions were purchased by BA.


"To fly or not to fly there is no question!"
User currently offlineOrd From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1381 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2854 times:

American did place a temporary "order" for two 747-400s in the early 1990s. The order was dependant upon AA winning the rights for Chicago-Tokyo. The 747 was part of their application. When United won the route American dropped the order.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will American Airlines Ever Get The B 747-400? posted Mon Oct 16 2000 06:42:07 by United Airline
American Airlines Ever In Amsterdam? posted Wed Dec 22 2004 22:29:42 by Junior1970
Will American Airlines Ever Change Their Livery? posted Mon Jul 22 2002 03:48:24 by Brianhames
Has American Airlines Ever Operated The 737-200? posted Sat Jul 21 2001 09:45:59 by GKirk
Will Swissair Ever Get The B 747-400? posted Sun Nov 26 2000 10:44:21 by United Airline
BVB Ever Going To Get Another Flight? posted Sun Feb 26 2006 23:10:02 by QXatFAT
Air India To Get Another Ex SQ 747-412 posted Mon Sep 12 2005 13:55:26 by NA
747´s On Latin American Airlines posted Tue Mar 29 2005 20:29:31 by Kavanagh
LGA Ever Get A 747? posted Wed Dec 24 2003 19:22:04 by Akjetblue
Will Now Airlines ever really get off the ground? posted Fri Oct 3 2003 18:32:50 by Manairport