Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Britannia 767`s  
User currently offlineRyder10uk From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2003, 120 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2577 times:

Hello people

I am new to this board but have been reading topics for a long this.

A question to Rick or anyone in the know, i seem to remember Britannia doing some flights to FLL using 767 200`s and 300`s both ER. (are they continuing)

Can you explain why the 200 always go via Bangor when they have a superior range to the 300`s ?? i have always wondered.

thanks

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEdina From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 743 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2503 times:

Probably because BY carry the weight & baggage of 271 or 290 pax on their -200ERs (depending on the configuration).....a lot of holiday makers in not a very large aircraft....


Worked on - Caravelle Mercure A300 A320 F27 SD3-60 BAe146 747-100/200/400 DC10-30 767 777 737-400 757 A319 A321
User currently offlineAccidentally From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 643 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2437 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Customs?


Cory Crabtree - crab453 - Indianapolis - 2R2 - 1966 PA-32-260
User currently offlineRyder10uk From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2003, 120 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2404 times:

nah it has nothingto do with customs as its all set up at FLL probably something to do with edina`s answer altough im unconvinced is i have flown by 200` ER fully loaded nonsop to mco from CWL so im still unsure!

User currently offlineACEregular From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 675 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2362 times:

The 200's even though ER are restricted by payload. To operate direct to FLL they would more than likely need a to lose a bit of weight


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andy Graf - VAP




[Edited 2003-10-19 18:42:51]

User currently offlineRyder10uk From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2003, 120 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2313 times:

I still dont agree BY pack in the payload for both 200 and 300 so if so the 300 wouldnt make it either???

your thoughts?


User currently offlineWorldoftui From Sweden, joined Aug 2007, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2212 times:

Britannia do loads of cruise charters for various companies, and have a very good commercial relationship with P&O and Fred Olsen in particular.

Could the tech stop also be caused by the fact that many exclusive cruise charters operate an enhanced service from that offered by the regular holiday charters, including increased baggage allowance for those on board. For example, a fully loaded 767-200 with, say 290 pax on board, each taking 25 kgs of baggage adds an additional 1450kgs of weight. Also, who sticks to their baggage allowance?!

Just had a look for this winter and cant see any FLL flights with Britannia. Some unusual ones coming up, though, including EXT-JFK on 23rd Nov (763), EMA-BGR-MSY 3rd May 04 (762), also with 763's from LGW and MAN and LGW-STT 6th Dec (763).


User currently offlineACEregular From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 675 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2142 times:

Can you imagine what it is like to be sat on a 767-200 in charter configuration for the journey to FLL with a stop - its cattle class. BY aslo flew charter service to Australia in the same seats



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Europix



User currently offlineRyder10uk From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2003, 120 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2123 times:

It still doesnt make sense, BY would pack over 300 pax with the 300ER with increased payload so that would dramatically reduce the range of the 300ER to hence would also have to make a tech stop at BGR.
Rick your comments would be welcome.


User currently offlineCrosswind From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 2598 posts, RR: 58
Reply 9, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2073 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

BY also flew charter service to Australia in the same seats
----
Britannia's Australia/New Zealand flights were operated with B767-200s which had been reconfigured with 258 seats instead of the normal (at the time) 274/282 seats.

Britannia's B767-200s, which now normally only operate shorthaul flights, are configured with the legal maximum of 290 seats at 28" pitch.

Now Britannia's B767-300 aircarft operate their longhaul flights, but from the late 1980s until the late 1990s, the B767-200 operated the bulk of their longhual programme.

When Britannia operated their B767-200 aircraft nonstop to Orlando from the UK, they were configured for 274 seats, and from 1993 onwards were reconfigured for 282 seats. I would think now that the aircraft have 290 seats, Britannia can no longer guarantee nonstop UK-Florida operations on the B767-200 to their customers, although I'm sure that they operate nonstop whenever payloads/weather conditions permit...

Regards
CROSSWIND


User currently offlineBY188B From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 709 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2026 times:

Intersetingly enough the 767-200 is the only type in Britannia's fleet that hasnt been repainted in the new livery. I wonder if they plan too? or maybe they are getting rid of them?


next flights : BD LHR-TXL J, FR SXF-STN Y, SN BRU-LHR Y, MA LHR-BUD Y, BA BUD-LHR J, BA LCY-SNN-JFK J, BA JFK-LHR J, BA
User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 53
Reply 11, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1992 times:

wow 2-4-2...thats gotta be pretty tight...whats the pitch?? Looks like 30" or so Im guessing???

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineRyder10uk From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2003, 120 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1928 times:

28" i believe certainly on the 200 series, I think BY will keep the 200 for a while longer at least until they find a replacement i reckon they will wait for 7e7 makes sense

User currently offlineBalboy From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2000, 143 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1896 times:

BY 767-200 have 290 seats in the summer only. They do not operate longhaul routes in the summer.

If they operate longhaul, they are configured to 274, that's a seat pitch of 30", that's the same as all major charters in the UK and many sched airlines.

Australia routes have never been operated by a 767-200 with 290 seats.

A fully laden 767-200, even a cruise flight to FLL can make it if flying from LGW or MAN. If flying from an airfield with a shorter runway ( a lot of cruise flights operate from smaller airports) the 767 can not be fully fuelled, therefore resulting in a tech stop.

I also think the 200 will be around for a while yet as they are well maintained and fully paid for. New interiors will be fitted this winter.


User currently offlineBDRules From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2000, 1501 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1725 times:

Crosswind,

I can confirm that Britannia flights to Australia were operated by the 763 because I have done it a couple of times. Never have I seen the 762 in Australia and was there a lot in 1994/5.

Where did you get your information from???

BTW it was a bit of a cramp but didnt mind and i am 6'3

Regards

Stu


User currently offlineRick767 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 2662 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1731 times:

All the 762 flights to the USA are scheduled to make a tech stop in BGR outbound as they don't have the range for FLL, etc.. with full loads and the Winter jetstreams (which are further south and stronger than in the Summer). On certain days however, they can make it non-stop.

All return flights are planned direct.

The 763s sometimes have a tech stop scheduled at SNN/BGR outbound if operating from shorter runways like EXT or BOH, but indeed that too is often not needed and certainly never on the return in the -300.

Those Winter jetstreams are painful westbound but great for coming home.  Big grin



I used to love the smell of Jet-A in the morning...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Britannia 767 Low Pass Incident In 1990's? posted Tue Jul 12 2005 16:08:36 by CalAir
Finally A Britannia 767-200 In New Colours! posted Sat Dec 18 2004 13:13:59 by Demoose
Britannia's 767-300 posted Sun Feb 29 2004 20:00:21 by Bmi
Britannia 767-200 Seat Pitches posted Wed Feb 18 2004 14:38:35 by BDRules
Britannia 767 At Southampton 19.12.03 posted Sat Dec 20 2003 09:24:49 by Megaptera
Britannia 767`s posted Sun Oct 19 2003 17:07:37 by Ryder10uk
Britannia 767-200 Summer '03 Bases posted Thu Feb 6 2003 13:35:29 by Rick767
Britannia 767 To BGR And PBI Today posted Sat Nov 16 2002 01:49:19 by Big777jet
Britannia 767 Leaves Fleet posted Wed Jun 19 2002 01:04:38 by Balboy
Britannia 767-200 Future posted Sun Nov 25 2001 16:01:10 by Futura