Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
WN/SFO, What Happen?  
User currently offlinePsa53 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3065 posts, RR: 4
Posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1578 times:

On the subject of a spotting a
Southwest aircraft at Denver,
what happen at SFO and why
did Southwest pull-out?

I heard it was to delays/on-time
problems.Was there something else?


Tuesday's Off! Do not disturb.
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12103 posts, RR: 49
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1565 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

No that was one of the main reasons. You have an airline that requires quick turns. Doing the quick turn just to sit on the run way for an hour defeats the purpose.


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlinePsa53 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3065 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1534 times:

Then it must have been so bad to
give up a market like SFO.I mean,
this was PSA main market and I didn't
hear any problems.I also weight the
fact that prehaps on-time records
may not have been kept or as
important as today.
But this is shocking,because SFO is a
primary market place and you would
think the city would turn this problem around
fast.





Tuesday's Off! Do not disturb.
User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12103 posts, RR: 49
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1520 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The city can not cnotrol factors like fog tho.


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1473 times:

The problem at SFO (and for that matter, the old DEN Stapleton) is that the main parallel runways in use are spaced too closely together. In visual conditions there issn't any problem, but if cloud ceilings and/or visibilities degrade to force the airport from visual approaches to full ILS approaches, that's when the problems develop. The runway centerlines must be at least 2,500 feet apart for parallel ILSes, and 4,300 feet for simultaneous ILSes. SFO's 28L and 28R are a mere 600-700 feet part, so when the weather came down the airport essentially went to a single runway operation, and the delays quickly ensue. The Bay-area weather doesn't have to be anywhere even close to the 200-1/2 ILS minimums to trigger any of this, a 2,500 foot ceiling and/or vis below 5 miles does it, and that's pretty common weather for them sometimes.







User currently offlinePsa53 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3065 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1462 times:

I would say,if I were the CEO,
look at a businessman schedule
and fly all daytime and full time
in the summer.Just a thought.

Or weekends only.There has to
be hot button there somewhere
to adjust.




Tuesday's Off! Do not disturb.
User currently offlinePsa53 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3065 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1350 times:

To OPNLguy:

Thanks for the info: I didn't see your message
until now because I went to watch Series.

I better understand the situation and
conditions.




Tuesday's Off! Do not disturb.
User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1312 times:

Then it must have been so bad to
give up a market like SFO.I mean,
this was PSA main market and I didn't
hear any problems.I also weight the
fact that prehaps on-time records
may not have been kept or as
important as today.
But this is shocking,because SFO is a
primary market place and you would
think the city would turn this problem around
fast.
---------

WN has some patience for airports with problems. They often contribute their own money and time to get an airport's problems fixed when they have confidence in the long term situation. But if a city continually promisses to add capacity or reduce fees and never does it, they will leave. This happened to DEN, SFO and to an airport in Detroit.

They are nice but don't try to delay forever or mislead them, or they will leave. Or never enter a market in the first place.


User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 8, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1281 times:

Plus, WN's operations in the Bay Area (SJC and OAK) have been slightly increased since their dropping of SFO. They're doing just fine there.


"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Does Anyone Know What Happen To AA 132 On 1/29/08 posted Fri Feb 1 2008 21:28:28 by Mop357
What Happen To UAL 291 Tonight posted Thu Nov 22 2007 20:49:33 by N747PE
UA927 FRA-SFO What Is Happening? posted Sat Sep 15 2007 22:48:12 by 777-500ER
KLM To SFO- What Aircraft? posted Fri Aug 31 2007 13:47:44 by Eirbus06
What Happen To Delta On IND-SLC? posted Tue Jun 19 2007 00:15:15 by Boeing743
A7-ABV - What's Happen? posted Sat Apr 21 2007 12:17:23 by Viasa
WN @ SFO To Be Significantly Larger Than Before posted Thu Mar 1 2007 06:50:03 by RL757PVD
What Happen To AI Today At LAX? (1-1-07) posted Tue Jan 2 2007 03:08:46 by Kaitak744
What Happen To The Venezuela-U.S Expansion? posted Mon Oct 9 2006 21:28:46 by CCSLSP
What Happen To AC B767-200ER's Tail Logo? posted Thu Aug 31 2006 03:45:15 by AirCanada014