Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LH Why Not An A330/340 To PHX?  
User currently offlineAV8AJET From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1333 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3987 times:

LH was using an A340-200 on the FRA - PHX - FRA route until the -200's were no longer with them. Why did they then switch to the B763ER's? Is there little premium traffic on this route? I would have thought using the A330 or even the A340-300 would have been a wise choice? Is the B763 still used to ATL or is that back to a A343?


"To fly or not to fly there is no question!"
16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3925 times:

British Airways really dominates the high-fare European traffic from PHX, getting an added bonus from the America West codeshare. I imagine Lufthansa really just picks up the scraps--there is probably a good amount of business traffic between PHX and Germany, but I think most of the passengers on this flight are going to be German tourists. Better to use the A330s/A340s for more business-oriented markets like DTW/ORD/LAX/SFO, I guess.

Aaron G.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 2, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3860 times:

LH has flown many an A340-313X to PHX... in fact, they frequently fly/flew their youngest frame there.

N


User currently offlineFraT From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 1102 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3840 times:

One of the two 763s will be used on the MUC-MIA route this winter season.

User currently online4holer From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2994 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3761 times:

Actually, my sister is on that flight (FRA-PHX) as I type this. I assure you that she is not a German tourist.
She is a PHX tourist who took the flight enroute to Italy.
Not sure if it was "high fare" but I doubt it.
I guess my baby sister is in the category of "scraps" then...  Wink/being sarcastic



Ghosts appear and fade away.....................
User currently offlineBesttravel From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 14 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3721 times:

This week -- that route was operated by Condor for Lufthansa -- hence the 767. When the 2-per-week November nonstop service starts again next week, it will be serviced by the Lufthansa A340.
Hope that helps!

Matt - besttravel


User currently offlineUsairways85 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 3372 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3646 times:

BTW, FRA-ATL is back to a daily 343

Starting Nov. FRA-PHX will be a 3x weekly 343

[Edited 2003-10-24 22:49:44]

User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32567 posts, RR: 72
Reply 7, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3580 times:

One of the two 763s will be used on the MUC-MIA route this winter season.


Not for the whole winter season. The flight becomes an A340-300 in January.



a.
User currently offlineKa From Switzerland, joined Apr 2000, 660 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3533 times:

Brings me to the question what they are doing with the two B763? Have they terminated the lease agreement with Lauda early? Or has LH/Condor other plans for them??

KA.



Keep smiling - you might be on Radar!
User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 849 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3509 times:

While we writing about LH, where´s the destination
for the 346´s?
Curius...

Michael/SE



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineL1011Lover From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 989 posts, RR: 14
Reply 10, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3477 times:

Hi all,

...I´m a flight attendant working these LH/DE 767 flights.

Beginning Oct. 26 our 767 will fly a daily service MUC-MIA-MUC.

ATL is back to A340 operation since august

PHX and PHL will both go back to A340 operation as soon as the MIA operation starts.

Hope this helps!

By the way I really don´t know why everybody complained about these two 767 a/c???!!! I never heard any complains from people who flew them with Lauda???!!! Everybody calls Lauda a premium carrier?
Our 767´s have definetly a way better economy section, than any LH 340 or 744!!!
And even some people might think that the A340 is the better plane (I definetly don´t agree), we are the better cabin crew though!!!  Wink/being sarcastic

I definetly miss coming to ATL, will also miss PHX and PHL!

Looking fwd. flying the MIA trip!!!

Best regards.


User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12090 posts, RR: 49
Reply 11, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 3430 times:

I flew the 767 with Condor crews and it was great service and a comfortable cabin as well.


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineJohnnybgoode From Germany, joined Jan 2001, 2187 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3307 times:

the lease of these two Lauda 763s will probably end early next year.

the reason why LH doesn´t operate A343s to PHX on the one hand is the fact that there´s almost no First Class demand so they don´t need the A343s for this leg, and on the other hand they don´t operate their leased A332s to PHX because on this long flight, LH crews must be granted a certain rest time. however, the ex SR- and SN A332s are not compatible with the moveable crew rest containers that LH owns, so they only send the Condor-piloted 763s there (different contracts, no required crew rest).

hope that answers some questions

cheers
daniel



If only pure sweetness was offered, why's this bitter taste left in my mouth.
User currently offlineSetjet From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 1102 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3254 times:

I flew PHX-FRA a couple of weeks ago in Business Class:

The aircraft IS below LH standards, less space than in the A340, old furniture, no duty-free on that flight, longer flight time. Reasons enough I am happy that the A340 will again be used?!?


User currently offlineFraT From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 1102 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 3191 times:

"While we writing about LH, where´s the destination
for the 346´s? "

AS far as I know, the first 3 destinations will be
Buenos Aires/Santiago de Chile
Toronto
Vancouver


User currently offlineFinnWings From Finland, joined Oct 2003, 640 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3115 times:

Hi,

I agree with you Setjet that B767 is below LH standards... B767 would be good aircraft for long haul charter work or for transcontinental US flights, but absolutely not the right choice for FRA-PHX route. I wonder why LH ever took 767s even they are on short term lease.

The most disturbing things on board of B767 are NOISE and very outdated lavatories (like all Boeing's aircrafts, EXCEPT B777). Especially on 8hrs+ flights noise is really annoying! I have flown many times with B747, B767, B777, A330, A340, DC-10, MD-11 and all those are quieter than B767... Just my thoughts.

Regards,
FinnWings


User currently offlineL1011Lover From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 989 posts, RR: 14
Reply 16, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3049 times:

Hey...

you guys should not forget, the 767 is still the queen of the Northatlantic!

There is no other plane crossing the pond more often than the Boeing 767!!!

So it´s definetly not just the right plane for charters or transcontinental US flights. Except for NW all the US majors fly the 767 frequently and in large numbers on transatlantic services, and they´re highly satisfied with it!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Mayrhuber: LH "Not In A Hurry" To Decide On 748I posted Tue Nov 14 2006 08:55:38 by Leelaw
More A330/340 To EK/QR posted Sat Feb 14 2004 06:58:36 by Flying-Tiger
Why Not MH And SQ To New York Via Syria Or Lebanon posted Sat Jun 14 2003 16:31:51 by Airmale
Why ARJ 85 At LH? Why Not ARJ 70? posted Tue Apr 24 2001 15:03:10 by Airsicknessbag
Why Not An A322 posted Mon Aug 21 2000 17:42:40 by Rw
Why NOT -- AA To GEO And PMB? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 01:34:08 by AJMIA
LGW -why Not A Tunnel To Pier 2, North Terminal posted Tue Oct 24 2006 15:22:31 by TimRees
Why A340 - Why Not A330 If Less Fuel Consumption? posted Thu Oct 5 2006 17:50:31 by LordHowe
LH Back To PHX? posted Sun Aug 27 2006 06:50:33 by Bridogger6
Why Do I Always Get Upgraded To An Asile? posted Fri Aug 4 2006 02:24:59 by Lincoln