HlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted
Wed Oct 29 2003 22:27:55 UTC (11 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2710 times:
I dont think that would be a wise move for them. I thought they were trying to attract other airlines.
NorthStarDC4M From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 3145 posts, RR: 35
Reply 2, posted
Wed Oct 29 2003 22:37:23 UTC (11 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2688 times:
well since ironically
DTW competes to some extent with YYZ who have skyrocketed their fees... I think they are seeing the debt load from the new terminal and have decided that they can afford to raise fees to pay it off.
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
ElectraBob From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 931 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted
Wed Oct 29 2003 23:09:22 UTC (11 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2636 times:
Story about the landing fee increase also in this morning's Detroit Newpaper.
DTW's fees will go from $3.26 per 1000 lbs to $3.97 per 1000 lbs.
FLL's landing fee is 97 cents per 1000 lbs.
The Detroit Free Press gave some estimates on how the new fees will impact certain aircraft types that use DTW.
DC-9-30 will rise from $322.74 per landing to $393.03
A320 Airbus will rise from $463.57 to $564.53
B757-200 will rise from $645.48 to $786.06
I heard a few weeks ago that YYZ has the highest landing fees in North America and are in the top 10 worldwide.
Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.....
N766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8629 posts, RR: 23
Reply 4, posted
Wed Oct 29 2003 23:21:31 UTC (11 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2618 times:
Wow, I think this is the first time Cleveland has had lower landing fees than metro. And almost a dollar lower, too!
This Website Censors Me
PSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7985 posts, RR: 26
Reply 5, posted
Thu Oct 30 2003 00:09:11 UTC (11 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2578 times:
More or less to finance the proposed rebuild of the Davey terminal.
This likely won't affect NW too much, just tack on another dollar to passenger airfare.....
Syncmaster From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 2069 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted
Thu Oct 30 2003 01:33:19 UTC (11 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2536 times:
That doesn't seem like much of a much of an increase, but I'm sure it'll add up over time. Thanks for your input everyone.