Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
INTL` Airlines To MKE?  
User currently offlineAATriple7 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 160 posts, RR: 1
Posted (11 years 1 month 7 hours ago) and read 2418 times:

I live up in Milwaukee and I sure am getting sick of only seeing Midwest and Northwest Airlines when I go spotting. There is only one scheduled heavy coming into MKE(not counting freighters) and that is a NWA 753 from MSP. I was wondering if any International Airlines would ever consider coming to MKE. Your Thoughts


AATriple7


USAF
24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNtspelich From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 764 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 6 hours ago) and read 2370 times:

Other than AC Jazz, which is there already, I'd say no. With ORD just down the road, I don't see how it could be profitable to run ops out of two locations.

NS



United 717 heavy, you're facing the wrong way. Any chance you can powerback to get off of my deice pad?
User currently offlineLambertMan From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2081 posts, RR: 36
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 6 hours ago) and read 2367 times:

Well you guys already have AC and that's about all you can hope for in my mind. European flights are pretty much out of the question, SAN, MSY, and MCI are more attractive right now to the european carriers. Mexico flights would be a longshot but not as long as the european flights. Maybe with AeroMexico's new 73NG's you could get at the most like a 2x weekly CUN or MEX but I highly doubt it. It sucks being a small to midsized market doesn't it? Big thumbs up

User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 6 hours ago) and read 2346 times:

I was wondering if any International Airlines would ever consider coming to MKE.

There have been constant rumors of China Airlines considering MKE as their next US gateway, but nothing concrete seems to have developed from it.


User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 3 hours ago) and read 2214 times:

I had totally forgotten about that rumor, B747-437B. Along those same lines, have you heard anything about Air Madagascar possibly launching service to CLE?


"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineLastBaron From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 290 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 3 hours ago) and read 2189 times:

What is the attraction of MSY as far as European carriers are concerned? I don't follow that... except for Mardi Gras, there just isn't that much there to attract a year-round European connection, is there? Just curious...

User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 3 hours ago) and read 2192 times:

have you heard anything about Air Madagascar possibly launching service to CLE?

After the proposed codeshare with Continental fell through, I don't think CLE remains an attractive destination for them anymore.


User currently offlineDeltaSFO From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 2488 posts, RR: 22
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 3 hours ago) and read 2132 times:

I've heard Qantas is looking strongly at coming in, once more of the 744ERs come online.


It's a new day. Every moment matters. Now, more than ever.
User currently offlineAaway From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1550 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 month 3 hours ago) and read 2125 times:

LastBaron,
MSY is one of the top tourist destinations in the U. S. And seems to only get more popular! Theres a major convention or festival practically every month. Perhaps Steve in MSY can give more details.



With a choice between changing one's mind & proving there's no need to do so, most everyone gets busy on the proof.
User currently offlineTekelberry From United States of America, joined May 2003, 1459 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 month 2 hours ago) and read 2086 times:

I'll ask you all politely to quit mocking MKE. We are labled constantly as one of the most under-served market in the US mainly because YX and NWA are so strong here.

Anyways, I think Lufthansa used to serve MKE due to Milwaukee's strong German background. They don't serve us anymore however.

I wouldn't expect any other int'l airlines to come flocking into MKE except AC. I believe that we do have international flights to Mexico from charters such as FunJet.


User currently offlineLastBaron From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 290 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 month 2 hours ago) and read 2070 times:

Who is mocking MKE here? All I see are some very nice posts to this thread... no one is mocking the beer capital of the U.S. - but there cannot be that much demand, and that sadly is a fact of life. I live in BTV and that is not much of a destination either, Tekelberry...

User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (11 years 1 month 2 hours ago) and read 2070 times:

What about Aeroflot to TUL?


"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineTekelberry From United States of America, joined May 2003, 1459 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (11 years 1 month 2 hours ago) and read 2057 times:

Who is mocking MKE here? All I see are some very nice posts to this thread... no one is mocking the beer capital of the U.S. - but there cannot be that much demand, and that sadly is a fact of life. I live in BTV and that is not much of a destination either, Tekelberry...

I've heard Qantas is looking strongly at coming in, once more of the 744ERs come online.

There have been constant rumors of China Airlines considering MKE as their next US gateway, but nothing concrete seems to have developed from it.

Qantas? Air China? Do you actually think the posters are serious?


User currently offlineLambertMan From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2081 posts, RR: 36
Reply 13, posted (11 years 1 month 2 hours ago) and read 2031 times:

Yeah, guys there is no real reason to rip on MKE. The guy was just wondering if there was any prospects for international carriers. Big thumbs up

User currently offlineLastBaron From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 290 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (11 years 1 month 2 hours ago) and read 2028 times:

Oh well, my bad... sorry. It doesn't seem that outlandish, though, given that with codesharing, all sorts of the weirdest carrier pairings are happening these days - the monitors at SRQ last week looked positively worldly, even though it was only because of code-sharing with British, AeroMexico, etc...

Even MKE should have some international pairings on its monitors these days, shouldn't it? If it doesn't maybe MKE does deserve to be satirized a little. Of course, upon reflection, yes, Air China using MKE as a gateway does seem a little odd, now that you mention it... QANTAS, too...  Wink/being sarcastic


User currently offlineAATriple7 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 160 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (11 years 1 month 1 hour ago) and read 1992 times:

I think that LH could do pretty well here if they bring a 763 or 330. I don't think anyone was mocking MKE it is just that the airport here is a joke I was just in PHX and after see all the action there it almost isn't worth it to go spot at MKE simply because of the lack of variety all there is here is YX and NW, oh and maybe some ERJ`s that is it.


AATriple7



USAF
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (11 years 1 month 1 hour ago) and read 1977 times:

Air China? Do you actually think the posters are serious?

Of course not. AIR CHINA would never fly to MKE.

I'm talking about CHINA AIRLINES.


User currently offlineExpressjetphx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (11 years 1 month 1 hour ago) and read 1965 times:

Well, maybe WestJet or new Canadian LCC jetsgo, or possibly a seasonal Air Jamaica type with the A319 (do they even have them?), if not, the A320. What about AeroMexico's new 73Gs w/ winglets?

User currently offlineMlsrar From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 1417 posts, RR: 8
Reply 18, posted (11 years 1 month 1 hour ago) and read 1946 times:

Well, short of calling the Ryanair charters operating for Funjet (Speaking of those charters, Mark Travel, parent company of Funjet Vacations is using Midwest to charter to PVR and CUN), I would sincerely doubt any service.

But, we did get an ANA charter for Harley-100! And, we've seen some occassional diversions, so if you really want to see international carriers, wait until ORD closes, grab your 28-300, sit on Howell Avenue and enjoy the show!



I mean, for the right price I’ll fight a lion. - Mike Tyson
User currently offlineMSYtristar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (11 years 1 month 1 hour ago) and read 1919 times:

As far as MSY is concerned....

It is a very popular tourist/convention market. There are conventions going on weekly which bring in travellers from all around the world. The city is always ranked high for its dining, attractions, historical venues, and music scene. It's not just Mardi Gras, and anyone that knows anything about the city will tell you that. Don't listen to the negative opionions from others...they haven't a a clue! The city is constantly ranked in the "top 10 North American cities" list, and in the "top 15 in the world."

Being a large port city, there is a good deal of traffic to Europe. Many workers on the ocean-going freighters use MSY to fly back to their homes, which are mostly located in Europe and Eastern Europe. Also, the obvious connection between Louisiana and France...both culturally and economically....don't listen to JCS or whoever else, there is a strong connection here.

That being said, MSY has been ignored because of a lack of major business ties to European markets. Sure, some MSY-based companies (Tidewater,Freeport/McMoran,etc) have European offices, but not enough to really justify a direct flight....yet.

Overall, the demand is there from tourists and conventioneers to justify a twice-weekly, year-round service. It would not be any more low-yield than flights to MCO or LAS for instance.

Hope this helps a little.  Smile


Steve in New Orleans





User currently offlineLambertMan From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2081 posts, RR: 36
Reply 20, posted (11 years 1 month ago) and read 1910 times:

New Orleans, such a neat and diverse city, underserved by the majority of the carriers there. Find it hard to believe that someone hasn't picked up the MEX service that TW had. It averaged like 83 pax on a terrible terrible flight time. They probably could handle some type of 3 or 4 times weekly service by LH or AF. I know they were under consideration when PDX got the flight along with SAN and I think my hometown airport, STL. They were spotted in STL 2 times! But it wouldnt bother me to see MSY get the flight instead of STL, they haven't had one for awhile and they probably could justify having one. Big thumbs up

User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12148 posts, RR: 49
Reply 21, posted (11 years 1 month ago) and read 1875 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

MKE is a great town, I use to work for a tour operator who did a MKE to FRA charter during the Summer. We used an ATA 757 that was non stop that had a possible fuel stop in Gander on the return if needed, it depended on the loads and weather conditions. The charters were run the Summer of 1992. We had decent loads tho the real reason is we got a great price on the aircraft because it was after the first gulf war. Also we were at that time based in MI so WI was a secondary market for us and we only did it for the one year.


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineMSYtristar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (11 years 1 month ago) and read 1853 times:

Lambertman, just a quick question for you....

What service would be better supported from STL: BA to London, AF to Paris, or LH to Frankfurt? I think any of the above could theoretically work, maybe 3-times per week. Surely, the population of the area alone justifies a nonstop to Europe, and that's not saying anything about the business connections!


Steve in New Orleans


User currently offlineFlyLAX From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 154 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (11 years 1 month ago) and read 1845 times:

I was just at MKE about 2 weeks ago. I was on an American Eagle ERJ and our plane taxied past what appeared to be their INTL terminal. Now being that LAX is my home airport, and just having arrived from ORD as a connection, the INTL terminal at MKE does leave a little something to be desired but with only one gate and all. But I understand that MKE is a small airport and only up the street from ORD where most INTL come and go. SAN is about the same distance from LAX as MKE is from ORD. SAN gets nowhere near the amount of INTL flights as does LAX.

User currently offlineLambertMan From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2081 posts, RR: 36
Reply 24, posted (11 years 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1794 times:

MSY, AF to CDG would be a definite failure. For some reason STL's O/D to Paris is next to nil. It didn't even work with a huge number of connections thru the TW system. They had to operate it seasonally with a 762/3 to make it perform even reasonable. BA to LGW wouldnt be a failure with 3x a week 772, maybe it'll happen down the road if AA stays here and if an open skies agreement is signed. The one that I think that would actually work is LH to FRA, STL Post-Dispatch listed it above London for number one international destination from Lambert Field. It went FRA, LGW, SXM or CDG (not sure which is 3rd or 4th), FCO. I don't have the numbers on FRA O/D from Lambert. I do have it on STL-LGW, when u divide total pax per year by 365 days u get approx. 174 a day. So if FRA's is better it has to make me wonder what exactly is it? And why it is that TW never tapped into that market. I know they were going to, but still I think they would have started it earlier. Big thumbs up

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any New Airlines To MKE posted Mon Apr 1 2002 05:30:05 by CO777-200ER
Intl Airlines Looking To Develop Mid East Hubs posted Tue Apr 24 2007 06:39:51 by VHVXB
Midwest Airlines To Introduce MKE-SNA posted Wed Jun 25 2003 19:59:10 by KUGN
Domestic Airlines Looking To Be Intl' Airlines posted Mon Jun 12 2000 05:26:39 by Blink182
Turkish Airlines To Start Ankara - TLV Next Year posted Thu Jun 28 2007 01:21:57 by Amirs
JetBlue 126 Diverting To MKE Right Now posted Wed Jun 27 2007 22:22:07 by CO777-200ER
AA Flight 1082 Diverted To MKE posted Tue Jun 26 2007 03:46:20 by CO777-200ER
Few Airlines To Bandar Seri Begawan posted Tue Jun 19 2007 16:28:29 by LaPaige
Gulf Airlines To Get Royal Treatment At Paris posted Thu Jun 14 2007 15:55:08 by EI321
LAN Airlines To Announce Order For Four B777s? posted Thu Jun 7 2007 23:04:56 by PlaneHunter