Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Parker And Kelly Comment On SWA & PHL  
User currently offline737doctor From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1332 posts, RR: 38
Posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2799 times:

I was fortunate enough to sit in on a question and answer session at a MX conference today in which our CEO Jim Parker and our CFO Gary Kelly spoke about our plans for PHL.

Many of you have commented on the fact that it seems a departure from our normal business model, which both men readily admitted. According to Mr. Parker, the reason we chose PHL was because it is the largest market without a significant low cost presence. For that reason, the Company foresees an excellent opportunity for growth, not only in PHL, but in the Northeast region as a whole.

Some of you have expressed a sentiment that SWA is trying to put US Airways out of business. Jim Parker, while acknowledging that we will be in direct competition with US Airways in their own backyard, said that Southwest wishes no ill will to US Airways or their employees; the company is simply moving forward with our plan for growth after holding our ground during the uncertainty following 9/11.

As far as being a risky move on our part, Gary Kelly says, that thus far, most investment strategists view the move favorably due to our track record.

Also, Mr Parker said that PHL will probably be our only new city in 2004, but like everything, they are always looking at new avenues for growth in the future. They analyze a hundred different options before making one decision. Situations can and do change depending on the prevailing conditions at the time.

Hope this helps answer some questions and clarify things a bit.


Patrick Bateman is my hero.
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAaway From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1523 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2770 times:

With all do respect to Mr. Parker...his statement of no ill will toward US and it's employees sounds a bit euphemistic.
This is tantamount to Kobe and Shaq saying "We get along just fine. No problems between us."  Big grin



With a choice between changing one's mind & proving there's no need to do so, most everyone gets busy on the proof.
User currently offline737doctor From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1332 posts, RR: 38
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2747 times:

Hey, we're all brothers and sisters in the airline industry. I have friends at our competitors and work alongside other SWA mechanics with wives and loved ones employed by other carriers as well. I know business is business (I said that in another thread), but it's nothing personal, so I take him at his word.


Patrick Bateman is my hero.
User currently offlineAaway From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1523 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2714 times:

737Dr.,
Agreed! Being a former UA employee, and now closely aligned with, yet not directly employed by, AA, I always root for AA vs. UA. I certainly don't wish for the outright failure of UA, though.



With a choice between changing one's mind & proving there's no need to do so, most everyone gets busy on the proof.
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2706 times:

>>>With all do respect to Mr. Parker...his statement of no ill will toward US and it's employees sounds a bit euphemistic.

If you don't know him, and what kind of guy he really is, sure, it probably does.

I'll take him at his word also....


User currently offlineDc10guy From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 2685 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2685 times:

Hopefully the end will come quickly for usairways.... God bless Southwest >>> they are proof unions & airlines can work well together. I fly on them when ever I have a choice to.


Next time try the old "dirty Sanchez" She'll love it !!!
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5813 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2651 times:

I like USAir very much. BUT- this could be a disaster for them. That said, Dallas hosts both WN and AA, Atlanta hosts both DL and AirTran (FL?)

So maybe there's room...

R


User currently offlineAaway From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1523 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2624 times:

OPNLguy,
Absolutely correct! My remark was a jibe at WN, not directed at Mr. Parker since I'm in no position to assess or assign his personal motivation(s).
The initial comment credited to him struck me more as the typical corporate posturing one would typically hear when a gathering of the chieftains occurs.
Now back to the thread...



With a choice between changing one's mind & proving there's no need to do so, most everyone gets busy on the proof.
User currently offline737doctor From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1332 posts, RR: 38
Reply 8, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2530 times:

Well it was hardly a "gathering of the chieftains". Just a couple of executives gracious enough to answer some questions during a MX conference...

 Big grin



Patrick Bateman is my hero.
User currently offlineSwafa30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2461 times:

737doctor,

Did either Jim or Gary address the concerns many seem to be raising about constant delays in PHL? It's been years since I've flown through Philly so I don't have much of a frame of reference. My years in Ground Ops taught me what kind of havoc a delay prone airport can wreak on the entire system. Many a day I cursed St. Louis for tossing my entire schedule into chaos. Given the way our aircraft tend to flow...especially on the short hauls sometimes you can somehow manage to crawl out of an airport just to have to turnaround and go right back.

Oh well, I guess we will just have to wait and see.


User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12110 posts, RR: 48
Reply 10, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2448 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Maybe WN is taking the traffic into consideration and doing more point to point and keeping the connections to a minimum via PHL?


You can cut the irony with a knife
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AC's Used 345 Source And Related Impact On A&B posted Mon Jun 20 2005 01:18:31 by Turbojet
Funny Southwest Comment On PHL Flight posted Tue Jul 27 2004 21:19:09 by Drerx7
Forbes Article On SWA And F/A Negotiations posted Wed Apr 14 2004 23:22:44 by OPNLguy
Skytrax Comment On Their Surveys And Our Reactions posted Tue Apr 23 2002 20:03:12 by Singapore_Air
KE B744 Type And B772ER Type On NA Routes posted Sun Dec 17 2006 04:46:31 by ASTROJET707
AA1679 And AA 1647 On Tuesday December 19th. posted Sun Dec 17 2006 03:16:13 by Ruslan
Thai Airways Warns On A380 & Alitalia Partnership posted Fri Nov 17 2006 12:09:31 by Singapore_Air
Why No Geveva On Thomsonfly & Astraeus Website? posted Wed Oct 25 2006 14:15:43 by 8herveg
Inflight (no)service For Y On US&UK Based Airlines posted Wed Oct 18 2006 06:59:50 by A3
Crashes And The Effects On Airlines posted Wed Oct 4 2006 01:47:22 by ZschocheImages