Sbe727 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2001, 390 posts, RR: 0 Posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4358 times:
AN / ZGGG), China">CAN ANYONE TELL ME PLEASE IF IT IS POSSIBLE TO LEASE A TU-154 IN THE UK FOR A CHARTER FLYING PROGRAMME WITHIN EUROPE.
I KNOW THEY OP TO THE UK FOR FLIGHTS TO THEIR OWN COUNTRY BUT AN / ZGGG), China">CAN A UK COMPANY LEASE A TU-154 FOR FLIGHTS TO DEP UK TO HOLIDAY DESTINATIONS LIKE SPAIN,GREECE, CYPRUS ETC ETC.
IM NOT SURE WHAT THE RULES ARE FOR EUROPEAN CARRIERS WHO OPERATE THIS TYPE OF AIRCRAFT TO COME TO THE UK TO DO A FLYING PROGRAMME ON BEHALF OF A TOUR OPERATOR.
LEASE A HEMUS AIR TU-154 OF BULGARIA TO BASE ITS A/C IN THE UK TO DO A SUMMER FLYING PROGRAMME TO HOLIDAY HOTSPOTS ON BEHALF OF A UK TOUR OP.
I KNOW THERE MAY BE COMPLICATIONS WITH WORK PERMITS ETC BUT COULD U NOT JUST DO AN ACMI ALL INC LEASE FOR THE ABOVE AND HAVE THE AIRLINES OWN FLT DECK AND SENIOR CREW MEMBER ON BOARD WITH UK BASED CREW (ENGLISH CREW).
DOES ANYONE KNOW WHAT THE TYPICAL ALL INC LEASE RATE WOULD BE FOR A TU-154.
HOPE THE ABOVE MAKES SENSE AND WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR REPLIES.
Sbe727 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2001, 390 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4277 times:
THX FOR YOUR REPLY,
I HAVE A PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND WERE THINKING THAT A TU-154 WOULD HAVE BEEN FAR CHEAPER THAN SAY A 737. I DID WONDER ABOUT MAINTANENCE...ESPECIALLY BEING A RUSSIAN BUILT A/C...NOT MANY SPARES HERE IN THE UK I DONT THINK (IF ANY).
COULD SOMEONE MAYBE TELL ME WHAT THE TYPICAL ALL INC LEASE RATES ARE FOR THE FOLLOWING A/C PLEASE.
THOSE ARE THE KIND OF A/C I WOULD BE THINKING ABOUT AS EXP PAX LOAD WOULD BE 150-200.
IM TRYING TO GET THE CHEAPEST TO BE HONEST....... ITS BASICALLY A BUMS ON SEATS AND OFF YOU GO TYPE OF OPERATION SO THE LOWER THE LEASE RATE...THE LOWER THE SEAT COST WLD BE.
Ben From Switzerland, joined Aug 1999, 1391 posts, RR: 50
Reply 4, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4181 times:
I don't know if you would have any problems with the legal side, but in this country the law often comes second to "trial by media".
Don't underestimate the western prejudice against all things Russian, and particularly aviation.
Can you imagine the headlines in The Sun if you started flying passengers in a Tupolev? even if it was successful? even if it was a brand new aircraft? There is no shortage of trashy tabloids in the UK who would love to write headlines about that.
In the minds of the British public, a 30 year old flying junkyard 737-200 is infinitely more desirable than the newest, most hi-tech Tu-204 for instance. All because one is a "Boeing" and the other is a Russian piece of sh!t. (Of course it's not true and those are not my views, but that's what people really do think!)
Remember the Tu-154 / 757 mid-air collision a few years ago? The Tu-154 (delivered 1995) was actually 5 years younger than the 757 but the next day, every media outlet was reporting things like "outdated '60s Russian jet" and calling them "Russian cowboys of the air", "none or outdated collision avoidance systems" even though both were under ATC and both had new TCAS.
Best to get yourself an old Boeing, save yourself the hassle....
David_itl From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 7574 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4090 times:
Anyone (other than me!) who can remember the Globe Mediterranean fiasco back in 1991? They were a MAN based airline who lasted no more than a couple of months before they stopped flying; the tour operators who contracted them arranged to have Air Via base a Tu154 operating ex-MAN for the majority of the summer.
Crosswind From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 2617 posts, RR: 57
Reply 9, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3983 times:
The VIA TU-154s were around, and still are, operating from and to Bulgaria, but they're not UK based or operating to countries other than Bulgaria.
The 1995 fiasco was a different aircraft.
A Yak-42 as I remember, but again based at Manchester. A broker had sold seats to various holiday companies, who though they were buying capacity on a GB leisure B737-200 that had been used the previous summer. The broker failed to secure the contract for said aircraft, and a Ukrainian Yak-42 was the only aircraft they could find to operate the contract. In an effort to make the aircraft look "normal" to passengers, the airline concerned repainted the aircraft with "Sunjet" titles. Doubt if it fooled the passengers.
There followed outcry from other UK airlines, widespread negative press coverage, upset, frightened passengers and furious tour operators.
Even though I thought there's no way there would be - there's even a photo of it in the database with Sunjet titles!!!
Anyone thinking about operating Russian aircraft in the UK passenger market would be unwise to try. No tour operator would knowingly buy capacity on such an aircraft and the CAA under pressure from UK airlines wouldn't allow it anyway. I beleive they only did in the above case because the broker concerned convinced them there was no other aircraft available, so it was either that or the passengers went nowhere.
Does the TU-154 even meet Stage III noise regulations???
OD720 From Lebanon, joined Feb 2003, 1926 posts, RR: 31
Reply 10, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3897 times:
The TU-154M is does meet Stage III noise regulations but the older models like the B-1, B-2 series don't. There are a lot of these in the former Soviet Union and I believe they can be very cheap.
As I said earlier, the newer TU-154M might be a little expensive. This model was in production up until 2002 (2 were built or completed) and are operated by many airlines and frequently seen in FRA and HAJ.
Airchabum From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 769 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3858 times:
The CAA/EC aren't too happy about bringing in non-EC a/c to be based in Europe especially if there is spare capacity available with European carriers. You may need to get non-objection letters from UK carriers (at least) before the CAA would let you use an Eastern Bloc a/c.
Incidentally, there are still 3 Virgin Sun A320's sitting in BOD which you could make a silly offer for, although you'd need to find your own crews.
Backfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3842 times:
...every media outlet was reporting things like "outdated '60s Russian jet" and calling them "Russian cowboys of the air", "none or outdated collision avoidance systems"...
A little ironic, Ben. You can't complain about prejudice one minute and then make a sweeping prejudicial statement about "every media outlet" getting its facts wrong. It's that kind of uninformed opinion that creates unfair bias in the first place. Did you read the coverage from "every media outlet" or just the trashy tabloids?
Jmc757 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2000, 1309 posts, RR: 7
Reply 14, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3692 times:
I think you'd be better to stick with a western aircraft anyway, for the reason of spares and maintenance if nothing else. Who would provide base maintenance??
The press is a dificult one. Yes they probably would kick up a fuss, but then they dont about the extensive programme balkan Holidays operate? Although I suppose they are not British. What crosswind said really sums it up... Stick with an old Boeing or MD
ManchesterMAN From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 1239 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3623 times:
My understanding is (and I may be wrong) that aircraft operating regularly within the EU must be registered in an EU country (there are countries such as Iceland that are also OK). Anyway if this is the case, one thing is for sure - you won't get a TU154 on the UK register. I was involved at one point in looking into the possibility of getting a TU-204 onto the register and whilst this wasn't persued there were a number of obstacles, particularly as they have to CAA approved for airworthyness and the CAA seem not to be the biggest fans of CIS-built aircraft.
Elwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3593 times:
To answer someone's question about the leasing price of an MD-80, I do remember that about a year and a half ago, some could be found for about $50K per month. That being said, with the market picking up, you may want to plan for $100K per month, then be pleasantly surprised when it comes out less.
I also have to agree with previous posts:
Thought the TU-154 is a fine aircraft, the press sees it as an out-dated piece of Soviet garbage (not helped much by our recent obliteration of Saddam's mostly Soviet-technology-equipped army--people draw parallels). Best to get an Airbus, Boeing, or MDD.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.