Jessman From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1506 posts, RR: 8 Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2934 times:
N766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 7991 posts, RR: 27 Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2890 times:
F9Widebody From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1604 posts, RR: 11 Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2797 times:
Drewwright From United States of America, joined May 2001, 621 posts, RR: 1 Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2845 times:
Now.......
ABQ
1 X 738
3 X CRJ
AEX
2 X CRJ
AMA
3 X CRJ
ATL
5 X 738
5 X M80
1 X 738
1 X CRJ
AUS
8 X CRJ
BTR
5 X CRJ
BHM
1 X ERJ
3 X CRJ
BOS
1 X M80
2 X 738
CHS
3 X CRJ
ORD
5 X CRJ
CVG
1 X 738
2 X M80
2 X CRJ
1 X CR7
COS
3 X CRJ
CAE
4 X CRJ
GTR
1 X CRJ
CMH
1 X ER3
1 X ERJ
CRP
3 X CRJ
DAB
2 X CRJ
DEN
4 X CRJ
DTW
2 X CRJ
ELP
2 X CRJ
1 X ERJ
FLL
2 X 738
VPS
4 X CRJ
GSO
2 X CRJ
GPT
3 X CRJ
IAH/HOU
7 X CRJ
3 X ER3
HSV
3 X CRJ
IND
2 X CRJ
1 X ERJ
JAN
4 X CRJ
1 X CR7
JAX
3 X CRJ
MCI
6 X CRJ
TYS
2 X CRJ
LFT
3 X ER3
LAS
2 X M90
1 X 738
LEX
2 X CRJ
LIT
1 X ER3
4 X CRJ
LAX
3 X 738
1 X M90
SDF
4 X CRJ
LBB
4 X CRJ
MLB
1 X CRJ
MSP
2 X CRJ
MOB
3 X CRJ
MLU
3 X CRJ
MGM
3 X CRJ
BNA
4 X CRJ
MSY
2 X ERJ
4 X CRJ
2 X CR7
NYC
3 X M80
XNA
4 X CRJ
OAK
2 X CR7
ONT
2 X CR7
SNA
2 X CR7
MCO
2 X 757
1 X M80
PFN
3 X ER3
1 X CRJ
PHX
4 X CRJ
PDX
1 X 733
1 X 738
RDU
3 X CRJ
SLC
2 X 757
2 X 738
1 X 733
1 X M80
1 X CRJ
SAT
9 X CRJ
SAN
1 X 733
1 X 738
1 X M90
SFO
1 X M90
2 X 733
SAV
3 X CRJ
SEA
3 X M90
SHV
4 X CRJ
TLH
2 X CRJ
TPA
3 X M90
TUS
3 X CRJ
TUL
4 X ER3
DCA
3 X CR7
PBI
2 X M90
ICT
3 X ER3
1 X CRJ
No wonder the whole E terminal is covered with CRJ's. I never knew how many RJ's go in there and I am here on a weekly basis. Sure would be nice to see some more mainline flights in here, at least a 76 or something would be nice LOL
TheGov From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 400 posts, RR: 3 Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2647 times:
One error that I see on the 1992 skd..
The DFW-HNL trip was never flown in the 90s with the L-1011-500. It was always flown with an L-1011-200/250 series. And for those in the know, it was most often ship 724, the worst L-1011 ever built.
And some possible errors in the 1992 skd:
I don't think there were DFW-DTW trips at that time
DFW-FRA was still being operated. Now that was with an L-1011-500, but I think by 1992 it was downgraded to a 767-300ER
Jhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6195 posts, RR: 13 Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2567 times:
DFW's Delta Hub Operation: November 22, 2001 as seen from a Delta 757 operatin DFW-LGA.
Proudtoflyaa From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2394 times:
One error that I see on the 1992 skd..
The DFW-HNL trip was never flown in the 90s with the L-1011-500. It was always flown with an L-1011-200/250 series. And for those in the know, it was most often ship 724, the worst L-1011 ever built.
DFW-HNL
12:15p 3:05p DL 17 FYBMQ L15 L 0
HNL-DFW
5:10p 5:10a DL 16 FYBMQ L15 D 0
You are correct that there is a 1-stop L10 from HNL (via LAX).
I don't think there were DFW-DTW trips at that time
DTW-DFW
8:55a 10:29a DL 1130 M80 B 0
4:00p 5:39p DL 645 M80 S 0
DFW-DTW
1:15p 4:55p DL 1200 73S L 0
5:01p 8:25p DL 318 72S D 0
DFW-FRA was still being operated. Now that was with an L-1011-500, but I think by 1992 it was downgraded to a 767-300ER
I did not include overseas intl flights. However, a 1987 DL timetable indicateds a daily DFW-FRA on L-1011-250. It also shows L-1011-500 operating DFW-HNL.
HlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 7 Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2348 times:
MCO
2 X 757
1 X M80
Actually, MCO gets an MD-90, I think it is part of the continuation flight from SAN.
Notdownnlocked From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 915 posts, RR: 1 Reply 12, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2236 times:
The Gov is correct about the L-1011 flights. It shows in the schedule as L15 but 724 was the only -250 and yes it was the worst ever. I was very happy to see it chopped in the desert.
MSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6242 posts, RR: 51 Reply 13, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2167 times:
The "L15" listing in the flight schedules were flights operated by both the -500 and -250 series aircraft. For instance, many flights from ATL to LGW were operted by a -250, but in the timetables, it was listed as "L15".
TheGov From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 400 posts, RR: 3 Reply 14, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2043 times:
L1011Lover: Ship 724 was the dreaded ship from hell. If it managed to leave the gate on time, it was a very rare occurrence. According to what I can remember, it was being built by Lockheed as a -200 when, in mid-build, it was converted to a -250 series. I don't know what happened in the conversion process, but the aircraft was never "quite right". Most gate agents, myself included, hated to see that ship number come up on our preliminary paperwork. It was like it was forever jinxed. I think the other HNL ships were 735 and 736. They were the only -200/250 with F/Y class, no C class
Proudtoflyaa: Flights 16/17 were ATL-DFW-HNL trips. I often worked FLT 16 HNL-DFW-ATL. It arrived DFW at 5:10 am and left around 6:30 am. (I add this statement as it is possible that I am misunderstanding what you are saying about the LAX stop) And as for the DTW trips, I was a gate agent for DL in 1992 at DFW, and I just don't recall them. According to your source, they were obviously there, but I don't recall every working one. 1992 was probably the zenith of hub activity at DFW and man was it fun!
Sponsor Message: 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 971 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
