FlyingBanker From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3012 times:
I was wondering if anyone knows if there has been any talk of the retirement of Alaska's MD-80's. Also, are they safe aircraft? I think they have been around for quite some time. I am considering flying with AS to OAK next month, it is on an MD-80. I mainly ask this because I have not flown on an AS MD-80 since there was that accident off the coast of California. I am sure my concern is somewhat silly and deep down I know I will be safe. But does anyone out their have any assurances. ANY INFO APPRECIATED...THANKS!
BlatantEcho From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1893 posts, RR: 1 Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2961 times:
I really dig the MD-80s at Alaska. I've taken them on short hops only, PDX-OAK, but if you are the middle or front, it's dead quiet. On T/O, you just hear a rush of air, and a nice push into the seat, no roar.
AS739X From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 5930 posts, RR: 22 Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2955 times:
Well Fliying, it is kinda silly, but I don't hold it against you. Our MD-80's are safer then ever after the incident. We have had multiple white glove inspections by the FAA with no warning and have passed with flying colors. The MD80 will be around for a few more year since we have such a cheap lease rate on them. As of today, Nov. 11th we have 27 in our fleet. Alll very safe my friend. Anymore questions, just ask!
"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
AgnusBymaster From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 652 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2876 times:
Sorry if this is off-topic, but I thought I might as well ask...
Now that Alaska is down to 27 MD-80s (compared to 40 734s), does it makes sense to have the MD-80s so "spread out" throughout their system? Currently MD-80s currently serve all four of Alaska's hubs (SEA, PDX, LAX and ANC). For scheduling purposes (I assume), AS has usually served most routes with a mix of 734s and MD-80s (with 73Gs and 739s coming on the line in recent years). But, with the number of MD-80s dwindling, perhaps AS might consider consolidating them to just SEA and LAX
At an airport such as PDX, they currently have three aircraft types...MD-80, 734, and 73G. Why not make it two? After all, AS only sees about 40 departures daily out of PDX (they don't even have a pilot base), and the MD-80 and 734 have basically the same seating capacity. It seems AS could improve operational reliability and streamline line maintenance out of PDX if they would stick to flying 734s and 73Gs in/out.
As far as ANC is concerned, they only receive a few MD-80s at this point anyway, and since the MD-80s are more prone to icing than the 737s, I can't see the point in continuing to fly MD-80s SEA-ANC-FAI during the winter. Again, just one less aircraft type to deal with.
Just my two cents. Maybe someone more knowledgeable with AS than I am could comment...
Airbrasil From Brazil, joined Nov 2003, 205 posts, RR: 1 Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2819 times:
I have flown many times on Alaska on the PDX-LAS, PDX-PHX routes on the MD-80 and unless if you are sitting ont he rear cabin, it is a very confortable and quiet plane. I think Alaska's customer service and in-flight service should be experienced by all of us aviation enthusiasts... Daniel
Flybynight From Norway, joined Jul 2003, 1004 posts, RR: 3 Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2777 times:
MD80'd are fine. Like someone else mentioned, they are nice and quiet since the distance between you and the engines is most likely far. Most AS MD80's were built in the late 80's to early 90's, so they are not old.
American 767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3522 posts, RR: 13 Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2543 times:
Oh yes the MD-80 is a nice aircraft to fly on as passenger, it's not that old and like you say you are most likely to be seated away from the engines. The aircraft rises quickly and quietly. It's a pleasant experience to fly on one. I was also curious what Alaska would do with their MD-80's when I saw the topic, when they would be phased out and on what routes they were still flown, I would look for an MD-80 if I were flying Alaska because I like it and it will be phased out sooner than the 737 will. But never mind, I get to fly on a lot of them with American. When I fly on one I always look for a window seat within the first few rows of the passenger cabin.
AS739X From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 5930 posts, RR: 22 Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2499 times:
RayBolt-We are phasing them out, but don't expect it to be over night. We have 27 MD80 as off today and we don't have the new planes coming in to replace them. They have 3-4 more years in them at Alaska, unless we place a large quick order for some 737NG. Like many airline we dont have the money for it. We have closed the MD80 pilot base in LAX though and all Mad-Dog pilots are based in Seattle.
"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
Flybynight From Norway, joined Jul 2003, 1004 posts, RR: 3 Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2401 times:
And they were produced well into the 1990s, so we should be seeing them for many years to come.
The MD80's series lived on in the MD87's and MD90's right up until Boeing took over MD. Really, the B717 is just the continuation, and I believe Boeing is kicking around the 717-300, a larger B717.
I just flew on a AS MD80 two weeks ago. As usual a nice flight, but the brakes sure were rough as we came in to the gate. Captain was talking to some engineer about it at the jetway. Time for new brake pads!!
SprxflySWA From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 597 posts, RR: 0 Reply 18, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2149 times:
I loved when AS started up SEA-BOI again last March. Both were MD-80s,love the engine sound (from the outside).But they are now both -400s.
Flown many -80s, Alaska,Reno Air,PSA,etc. Love the performance!
Skymileman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 19, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2123 times:
Alaska Airlines keeps great maintenance on their entire fleet. They aren't half as old as some of the 727's that were operated for so long. I wouldn't have a second thought in the world about boarding one.