Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why No 777s And A380s For PIA?  
User currently offlineMEA321 From Lebanon, joined Oct 2003, 389 posts, RR: 16
Posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3333 times:

With a population of about 150 million people, a growing economy, and increasing transit traffic...How many of you think that Pakistan International Airlines should have invested in larger aircraft such as the A380 or the Boeing 777? They already operate 10 747s and 8 Airbus A300s. However, is that enough to keep up with the growth that is about to hit this region?


MEA321
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3298 times:

PIA has already ordered the 772ER, 772LR, and 773ER...

User currently offlineMikkel777 From Norway, joined Oct 2002, 370 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3279 times:

14-Nov-2002 Pakistan Int'l Airlines 777-200ER 3
14-Nov-2002 Pakistan Int'l Airlines 777-200LR 2
14-Nov-2002 Pakistan Int'l Airlines 777-300ER 3


User currently offlineAvObserver From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 2472 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3071 times:

I think it likely that PIA would acquire additional 747-400s, probably second-hand, before they get A380s. They'll have to ramp up their growth slowly, they're not Emirates. But eventually, as the region's air travel builds, there may in time be a need for the superjumbo.

User currently offlineIndianguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2803 times:

Short answer: Cash. Or rather the lack of it. Both PIA dn their owners the Govt are strapped for cash, perenially seeking extensions on their loan repayments. Unlike the other South Asian countries, the All the growth that you talk about has come through cash injections from foreign aid donors, and Foreign investment inflows are at an alltime low.

In this situation, Purchasing aircraft is possibly the LAST in their list of priorities.

The 777's were basically part of the payment that the Pakis received for the support they gave the Americans in their so-called "War on Terror". The 777's are a part payment for dumping the Taliban, a Paki creation.

-Roy


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No RJ And Commuter Terminals In Europe posted Tue Sep 19 2006 12:10:05 by Konrad
AA:why No 777s To France? posted Fri Sep 8 2006 16:44:15 by LY777
Why No 737, 767. 777 For NW posted Tue Aug 29 2006 06:41:40 by FL370
Longest Range 777s And 787s For US Carriers posted Tue Mar 7 2006 06:34:37 by AA777223
Why No Follow-up Orders For 737-900ER? posted Wed Oct 19 2005 08:51:04 by Lemurs
Why No 777s Into LAS? posted Sun Jun 12 2005 06:50:15 by Capt.Fantastic
Why No 777s At St. Maarten? posted Mon Nov 15 2004 06:52:31 by Springbok747
Why No A340 Or A320 For KLM? posted Sun Aug 22 2004 14:45:59 by Kl911
Why No 717 Or 757 For AF? posted Sun Apr 25 2004 12:45:24 by Airtrainer
Why No Long Range Airbus For BA? posted Sun Nov 9 2003 13:45:40 by EGFFbmi